The reduction mechanism of a natural chromite at 1416 °C
- 165 Downloads
- 32 Citations
Abstract
The behavior of a natural chromite from the Bushveld Complex, Transvaal, South Africa, during reduction at 1416 °C by graphite was studied by means of thermogravimetric analysis, X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis, energy-dispersive X-ray analysis (EDAX), and metallographic analysis. Experimental runs were allowed to proceed up to 120 minutes, resulting in 99 pct reduction. The specific objective of this study was to delineate the reduction mechanism of chromite by graphite. Zoning was observed in partially reduced chromites with degrees of reduction of up to about 70 pct. The inner cores were rich in iron, while the outer cores were depleted of iron. Energy-dispersive X-ray analysis revealed that Fe2+ and Cr3+ ions had diffused outward, whereas Cr2+, Al3+, and Mg2+ ions had diffused inward. The following mechanism of reduction, which is based on the assumption that the composition of the spinel phase remains stoichiometric with increasing degree of reduction, is proposed, (a) Initially, Fe3+ and Fe2+ ions at the surface of the chromite particle are reduced to the metallic state. This is followed immediately by the reduction of Cr3+ ions to the divalent state, (b) Cr2+ ions diffusing toward the center of the particle reduce the Fe3+ ions in the spinel under the surface of the particle to Fe2+ at the interface between the inner and outer cores. Fe2+ ions diffuse toward the surface, where they are reduced to metallic iron, (c) After the iron has been completely reduced, Cr3+ and any Cr2+ that is present are reduced to the metallic state, leaving an iron- and chromium-free spinel, MgAl2O4.
Keywords
Metallurgical Transaction Chromite Octahedral Site Spinel Structure Tetrahedral SitePreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- 1.G.C. Ulmer and W.B. White:J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 1966, vol. 49(1), pp. 50–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 2.R.W.G. Wyckoff:Crystal Structures, 2nd ed., Interscience Publishing Co., New York, NY, 1962, vol. 3, pp. 77–78.Google Scholar
- 3.K.P.D. Perry: Ph.D. Thesis, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, Republic of South Africa, 1986.Google Scholar
- 4.F.A. Kroger:The Chemistry of Imperfect Crystals, 2nd ed., North-Holland/American Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1974, vol. 2, pp. 251–55.Google Scholar
- 5.J.E. Castle and P.L. Surman:J. Phys. Chem., 1967, vol. 71, pp. 4255–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.W.D. Kingery, D.C. Hill, and R.P. Nelson:J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 1960, vol. 43 (9), pp. 473–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.E.J.M. Verwey:Z. Kristallogr., 1935, vol. 91, pp. 65–69.Google Scholar
- 8.E. Kordes:Z. Kristallogr., 1935, vol. 91, pp. 193–228.Google Scholar
- 9.G. Kullerud, G. Donnay, and J.D.H. Donnay:1968 Year Book, Carnegie Institute, Washington, DC, vol. 66, pp. 497-98.Google Scholar
- 10.G. Kullerud, G. Donnay, and J.D.H. Donnay:Z. Kristallogr., 1969, vol. 128 (1–2), pp. 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.R. Dieckmann and H. Schmalzried:Ber. Bunsen-Ges. Phys. Chem., 1977, vol. 81 (4), pp. 414–19.Google Scholar
- 12.W. Mueller and H. Schmalzried:Ber. Bunsen-Ges. Phys. Chem., 1964, vol. 68 (3), pp. 270–76.Google Scholar
- 13.T.O. Mason and H.K. Bowen:J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 1981, vol. 64 (2), pp. 86–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.J.W. Halloran and H.K. Bowen:J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 1980, vol. 63 (1–2), pp. 58–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.W.J. Rankin:Arch. Eisenhuettenwes., 1979, vol. 50 (9), pp. 373–78.Google Scholar
- 16.E.D. Kinloch: inICAM 81, Proc. 1st Int. Congress on Applied Mineralogy, J.P.R. de Villiers and P.A. Cawthorn, eds., The Geological Society of South Africa, Johannesburg, Republic of South Africa, 1983, pp. 337–49.Google Scholar
- 17.M.J. Searle and C.W.P. Finn: Report No. M96, Council for Mineral Technology, Randburg, Republic of South Africa, 1984.Google Scholar
- 18.T.R.C. Feraandes: inMINTEK 50, Proc. Int. Conf. on Mineral Science and Technology, L.F. Haughton, ed., Council for Mineral Technology, Randburg, Republic of South Africa, 1985, vol. 2, pp. 913-22.Google Scholar
- 19.N.L. Woollacott: Report No. 1950, National Institute for Metallurgy, Randburg, Republic of South Africa, 1978.Google Scholar
- 20.C.S. Kucukkaragoz, S.H. Algie, and C.W.P. Finn: MINTEK Report No. M154, Council for Mineral Technology, Randburg, Republic of South Africa, 1984.Google Scholar
- 21.C. Greskovich and V.S. Stubican:J. Phys. Chem. Solids, 1966, vol. 27, pp. 1379–84.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
- 22.A. Novakova, C. Kleir, and J.S. Jiru: inReactivity of Solids, G.M. Schwab, ed., Elsevier, New York, NY, 1965, pp. 269–76.Google Scholar
- 23.O. Katsutoshi and S. Awazu:J. Phys. Chem. Solids, 1968, vol. 29, pp. 1269–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 24.E.J.W. Verwey and E.L. Heilmann:J. Chem. Phys., 1947, vol. 15, pp. 174–80.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
- 25.S.A. De Waal and S.A. Hiemstra: Report No. 1709, National Institute for Metallurgy, Randburg, Republic of South Africa, 1975.Google Scholar
- 26.F. Freund, H. Kathrein, H. Wengeler, R. Knobel, and H.J. Heinen:Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 1980, vol. 44, pp. 1319–33.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
- 27.H. Wengeler: Ph.D. Thesis, University of Cologne, Cologne, Federal Republic of Germany, 1980.Google Scholar
- 28.A. Navrotsky and O.J. Kleppa:J. Inorg. Nucl. Chem., 1967, vol. 29, pp. 2701–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 29.J.O. Edstrom:J. Iron Steel Inst., 1953, vol. 175, pp. 289–304.Google Scholar
- 30.J.O. Edstrom:Jernkontorets Ann. 141, 1957, vol. 12, pp. 809–31.Google Scholar