The study of relaxation in asymmetrically strained Si1−x Ge x Si superlattices
- 20 Downloads
- 10 Citations
Abstract
Asymmetrically strained Si/SiGe superlattices consisting of 12 nm Si/4 nm Si0.65Ge0.35 have been grown in Si(001) by molecular beam epitaxy (MBE) and studied as a function of thermal treatments. Results indicate that initially, the interdiffusion is very rapid and non-linear, and at later annealing stages a steady-state interdiffusion is attained. Raman spectroscopy has been used to determine the Ge content and the strain independently, and to show that in the very early annealing stages, strain relaxation occurs predominantly by interdiffusion. This is supported by transmission electron microscopy (TEM) which indicates that less than 10% of the initial strain relaxation is caused by dislocation formation. In addition, a low temperature relaxation has been observed which may be related to misoriented SiGe crystallites at the superlattice/substrate interface, and increased in size with annealing at 631‡ C.
Key words
Relaxation interdiffusion strained superlatticesPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- 1.G. S. Higashi, J. C. Bean, C. Buescher, R. Yadvish and H. Temkin, Appl. Phys. Lett.56, 2560 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 2.G. L. Patton, S. S. Iyer, S. L. Delaage, S. Tiwari and J. M. Stork, IEEE Elec. Dev. Lett.9, 165 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3.J. C. Sturm, E. J. Prinz, P. M. Garone and P. V. Schwartz, Appl. Phys. Lett.54, 2707 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.W. Frank, U. Gosele, H. Mehrer and A. Seeger, in Diffusion in Crystalline Solids, eds. G. E. Murch and A. S. Nowick, (Academic Press, New York, 1984).Google Scholar
- 5.J. C. Bean, A. F. Fiory, R. Hull and R. T. Lynch, in Proc.1st Int. Symp. on Si MBE, ed. J. C. Bean (Electrochemical Soc., Pennington, NJ, 1985) p. 385.Google Scholar
- 6.R. M. Fleming, D. B. McWhan, A. C. Gossard, W. Wiegmann and R. A. Logan, J. Appl. Phys.51, 357 (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.S. J. Chang, K. L. Wang, R. C. Bowman, Jr. and P. M. Adams, Appl. Phys. Lett.54, 1253 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.S. M. Prokes and K. L. Wang, Appl. Phys. Lett. 56, 2628 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.S. S. Iyer and F. K. LeGoues, J. Appl. Phys.65, 4693 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.D. C. Houghton, D. D. Perovic, J. M. Baribeau and G. C. Weatherly, J. Appl. Phys.67, 1850 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.A. Ishizaka and Y. Shiroki, J. Electrochem. Soc.133, 666 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.M. Fatemi, S. M. Prokes, B. V. Shannabrook and K. L. Wang, in Advances in X-ray Analysis,v. 33, (1990).Google Scholar
- 13.S. M. Prokes, M. Fatemi and K. L. Wang, J. Vac. Sci.B 8, 254 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.A. L. Greer and F. Spaepen, Synthetic Modulated Structures, eds., L. L. Chang and B. C. Giessen, (Academic Press, New York, 1985) p. 470.Google Scholar
- 15.M. A. Renucci, J. B. Renucci and M. Cardona, Proc. Conf. on Light Scattering in Solids, ed. M. Balkanski (Flammarion, Paris, 1971) 326.Google Scholar
- 16.F. Cerdeira, A. Pinczuk, J. C. Bean, B. Batlogg and B. A. Wilson, Appl. Phys. Lett.45 1138 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.R. Hull, J. C. Bean, N. Chand, R. E. Leibenguth, D. Bahnck, S. M. Koch and J. S. Harris, Jr., Mater. Res. Soc. Proc.102 (Pittsburgh, lPA 1988) 455. $Google Scholar