, Volume 46, Issue 1, pp 1–26 | Cite as

Late Serpukhovian (Namurian A) microfacies and carbonate microfossils from the Carboniferous of Nötsch (Austria)

  • Karl Krainer
  • Daniel Vachard


The Carboniferous of Nötsch (Austria), divided into Erlachgraben, Badstub and Nötsch Formations, is composed of a thick sequence of dominantly siliciclastic deepsea sediments. Intercalated marly and silty limestones in the upper Erlachgraben Formation consist of bioclastic wackestones and algal wackestones/packstones which contain a diverse fossil assemblage of formainifers, algae and pseudo-algae. These microfossils are accurately described and documented, and three species of algae are established:Principia fluegeli n. sp.,Paraepimastopora noetschensis n. sp., andNanopora pseudofragilissima n. sp.

Based on the occurrence of both important species of the foraminifers Lasiodiscoidea (Howchinia gibba andEolasiodiscus dilatatus), and also on the presence ofEndothyranopsis plana, of the lastEarlandia ex. gr.vulgaris and of the firstEostaffella exp gr.postmosquensis, the upper Erlachgraben Formation is dated as late Serpukhovian (goniatite biozone E 2 of the Namurian A; Arnsbergian stage, corresponding to the Zapaltyubinsky of the standard Russian sequence; foraminiferal biozones 18 or Cf 7 of Belgium, or Cf 16 of the Donbass).

Compared to the Pyrenees and the Donbass region, the algal flora of the Carboniferous of Nötsch seems to be relatively endemic. Algae and foraminifers originally inhabited a shallow carbonate ramp and were transported and redeposited in a deep-water environment by gravity flows. The formainifers most probably migrated from the Donbass region along the shelf of a narrow seaway to Nötsch.


Microfacies Calcareous algae Microproblematica Foraminifers Nötsch (Carinthia, Austria) Early Carboniferous Serpukhovian Namurian A 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Aizenverg, D.E., Astakhova, T.V., Berchenko, O.I., Brazhnikova, N.E., Vdovenko, M.V., Dunaeva, N.N., Zernetskaya, N.V., Poletaev, V.I. and Sergeeva, M.T. (1983): Verkhneserpukhovskii podyarus Donetskogo basseina (Late Serpukhovian substage in the Donets Basin; in Russian).— Akademiya Nauk Ukrainskoi SSR, Institut Geologicheskikh Nauk, 164 p., 88 Pl., Kiev.Google Scholar
  2. Altiner, D. (1988): Pseudovidalinidae n. fam. andAngelina n. gen. from the Upper Permian of South and Southeast Turkey.— Revue de Paléobiologie, special volume2, Benthos'86, 25–36, 2 Pl., Genève.Google Scholar
  3. Amerom, H.W.J. van and Kabon, H. (1999): Neue fossile Floren aus dem Nötscher Karbon (1. Teil).—Carinthia II,189/109, 637–673, Klagenfurt.Google Scholar
  4. Amerom, H.W.J. van and Kabon, H. (2000): Neue fossile Floren aus dem Nötscher Karbon (2. Teil).—Carinthia II,190/110, 483–516, Klagenfurt.Google Scholar
  5. Amerom, H.W.J. van and Schönlaub, H.P. (1992): Pflanzenfossilien aus dem Karbon von Nötsch und der Hochwipfel-Formation der Karnischen Alpen (Österreich).—Jb. Geol. B.-A.,135, 195–216, Wien.Google Scholar
  6. Amler, M.R.W., Conil, R. and Kratz, K.R. (1991): Foraminifers from the Kirchbach Limestone (Carnic Alps, Austria).— Geologica et Paleontologica,25, 111–121, 1 Fig., 2 Tab., 2 Pl., Marburg.Google Scholar
  7. Argyriadis, I., Graciansky, P.C. de and Lys, M. (1976): Datation de niveaux rouges dans le Permien marin péri-égéen.—Bull. Soc. géol. Fr., (7),18/2, 513–519, Paris.Google Scholar
  8. Armstrong, A. K. and Mamet, B. L. (1977): Carboniferous microfacies, microfossils, and corals, Lisburne Group, Arctic Alaska. —United States Geological Survey Professional Paper,849, 144 p., 39 Pl., Washington.Google Scholar
  9. Austin, R., Conil, R., Groessens, E. and Pirlet, H. (1974): Etude biostratigraphique de l'encrinite de Tramaka.—Bull. Soc. belge Géol. Paléont. Hydrol.,83/2, 113–129, 3 Pl., Bruxelles.Google Scholar
  10. Bassoullet, J.P., Bernier, P., Deloffre, R., Genot, P., Jaffrezo, M. and Vachard, D. (1979): Essai de classification des Dasycladales en tribus.—Bull. Cent. Rech. Explor.-Prod. Elf-Aquitaine,3/2, 429–442, 5 tabl., Pau.Google Scholar
  11. Bensaid, M., Termier, H., Termier, G. and Vachard, D. (1979): Le Carbonifère (Viséen supérieur-Bachkirien) entre Bou Chber et Ich ou Mellal (Maroc Central).—Annales de la Société géologique du Nord,98, 189–204, Pl. 15–18, Villeneuve d'Ascq.Google Scholar
  12. Bensh, F.R., Rumyantseva, Z.S. and Sergunkova, O.I. (1996): Tianshan and Pamirs. In: Wagner R.H., Winkler-Prins C.F. and Granados L.F. (eds.): The Carboniferous of the World,3, 122–153, Madrid.Google Scholar
  13. Berkhli, M. (1993): Le Maroc oriental au Carbonifère inférieur (Viséen-Serpoukhovien): sédimentologie et stratigraphie séquentielle.—Thèse de l'Université de Lille I, 284 p., 19 Pl., Villeneuve d'Ascq.Google Scholar
  14. Bogush, O.I., Ivanova, R.M. and Luchinina, V.A. (1990): Izvestkovye vodorosli verkhnego Famena i nizhnego Karbona Urala i Sibiri (Calcareous algae from the late Famennian and early Carboniferous of Urals and Siberia; in Russian).—Akad. Nauk SSSR, Sibirskoe Otdel., Trudy Instituta Geologii i Geofiziki,745, 160 p., 32 Pl., Novosibirks.Google Scholar
  15. Bogush, O.I. and Juferev, O.V. (1962): Foraminifery i stratigrafiya kamennougolnykh otlozhenii Karatau i Talasskogo Alatau (Foraminifers and stratigraphy of Carboniferous deposits in Karatau and Talassk Alatau; in Russian).—Akad. Nauk SSSR, Sibirskoe Otdel., Trudy Instituta Geologii i Geofiziki, 234 p., 8 tabl., 9 Pl., Novosibirsk.Google Scholar
  16. Brady, H.B. (1873): OnArchaediscus Karreri a new type of Carboniferous foraminifera.—Ann. Mag. natur. Hist.,4/12, 286–290, Pl. 11, London.Google Scholar
  17. Brady, H.B. (1876): A monograph of the Carboniferous and Permian Foraminifera (the genusFusulina excepted).—The Palaeontographical Society,30, 166 p., 12 Pl., London.Google Scholar
  18. Brazhnikova, N.E. (1956): Foraminifera. In: Brazhnikova, N.E., Ishchenko, A.M., Ishchenko, T.A., Novik, E.O. and Shulga, P.L.: Fauna i flora kamennougolnykh otlozhenii Galitsisko-Volynskoi vpadiny (Fauna and flora from the Carboniferous of the Galitsie-Volyn Depression; in Russian).—(Akademiya Nauk Ukrainskoi SSR, Trudy Instituta Geologicheskikh Nauk, seriya stratigrafiya i paleontologiya,10, 16–103, 17 Pl., Kiev.Google Scholar
  19. Brazhnikova, N.E. (1964): KizucheniyuEosigmoilina iz nizhnego Karbona bolshogo Donbassa (On the study ofEosigmoilina in early Carboniferous of Great Donbass; in Russian). In: Aizenverg D.E. (ed.): Materialy k faune verkhnego Paleozoya Donbassa (Materials for late Paleozoic fauna of Donbass).— Akademiya Nauk Ukrainskoi SSR, Trudy Instituta Geologicheskikh Nauk,48, 3–15, 3 Pl., Kiev.Google Scholar
  20. Brazhnikova, N.E. and Yartseva, M.V. (1956): K voprosy ob evolyutsii rodaMonotaxis (On the problem of evolution of the genusMonotaxis; in Russian).—Voprosy Mikropaleontologii,1, 62–71, 1 Pl., Moskva.Google Scholar
  21. Brazhnikova, N.E., Vakarchuk, G.I., Vdovenko, M.V., Vinnichenko, L.V., Karpova, M.A., Kolomiets, Y.I., Potievskaya, P.D., Rostovtseva, L.F. and Shevchenko, G.D. (1967): Mikrofaunisticheskie markiruyushchie gorizonty kamennougolnykh i permskikh otlozhenii Dneprovsko-Donetskoi vpadiny (Microfaunal marker-horizons from the Carboniferous and Permian deposits of the Dniepr-Donets depression; in Russian).—Akad. Nauk Ukr. SSR, Inst. Geol. Nauk, Trudy, Izdatelstvo ≪Naukova Dumka≫ 224 p., 59 Pl., Kiev.Google Scholar
  22. Brenckle, P.L. and Grelecki, C.J. (1993): Type archaediscacean foraminifers (Carboniferous) from the former Soviet Union and Great Britain, with a description of computer modeling of archaediscean coiling.—Cushman Foundation for Foraminiferal Research, Special Publication,30, 59 p., 7 Pl., Cambridge MA.Google Scholar
  23. Brenckle, P.L., Marshall, F.C., Waller, S.F. and Wilhelm M.H. (1982): Calcareous microfossils from the Mississippian Keokuk Limestone and adjacent Formations, Upper Mississippi River Valley: their meaning for North American and Intercontinental correlation.—Geologica et Paleontologica,15, 47–88, 3 Fig., 2 tabl., 10 Pl., Marburg.Google Scholar
  24. Brenckle, P.L., Ramsbottom, W.H.C. and Marchant, T.R. (1987): Taxonomy and classification of Carboniferous Archaediscacean foraminifers.—Courier Forschung-Institut Senckenberg,98, 11–24, 3 Fig., Frankfurt.Google Scholar
  25. Brown, T. (1843): The elements of fossil conchology; according to the arrangement of Lamarck; with the newly established genera of other authors.—133 p., 12 Pl., London (Houlston and Stoneman).Google Scholar
  26. Browne, R.G. and Pohl, E.R. (1973): Stratigraphy and genera of calcareous foraminifera of the Frayleys facies (Mississippian) of Central Kentucky.—Bull. Amer. Paleont.,64, 173–227, Pl. 22–31, Ithaca.Google Scholar
  27. Buchroithner, M., Flügel, E., Flügel, H. and Stattegger, K. (1980): Mikrofazies, Fossilien und Herkunft der Kalk-Gerölle im Karbon-“Flysch” der Betischen Kordilleren, Spain.—Facies,2, 1–54, 8 Pl., Erlangen.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. China, W.E. (1965): Opinion 724.Endothyra bowmani Phillips (1846) (Foraminifera): valided under the plenary powers.— Bulletin of Zoological Nomenclature,22/1, 37–39, New-York.Google Scholar
  29. Chuvashov, B.I., Luchinina, V.A., Shuysky, V.P., Shaikin, I.M., Berchenko, O.I., Ishchenko, A.A., Saltovskaya, V.D. and Shirshova, D.I. (1987): Iskopaemye izvestkovye vodorosli; morfologiya, sistematika, metody izucheniya (Fossil calcareous algae: morphology, systematics, methods of study; in Russian).—Akademiya Nauk SSSR, Sibirskoe Otdelenie, Trudy Instituta Geologii i Geofiziki,674, 200 p., 24 Pl., Novosibirsk.Google Scholar
  30. Conil, R. and Lys, M. (1964): Matériaux pour l'étude micropaléontologique du, Dinantien de la Belgique et de la France (Avesnois). Pt. 1, Algues et Foraminifères; Pt. 2, Foraminifères (suite).—Mémoires de l'Institut de Géologie de l'Université de Louvain,23, 296 p., 33 Fig., 42 Pl., Louvain (Leuven).Google Scholar
  31. Cozar, P. (2000): Archaediscidae y Lasiodiscidae (Foraminiferida) del Mississippiense (Carbonífero) del área del Guadiato (Suroeste de España).—Revista Española de Micropaleontología,32/2, 193–212, 2 Pl., Madrid.Google Scholar
  32. Cummings, R.H. (1955a): New genera of foraminifera from the British lower Carboniferous.—Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences,45/1, 1–8, 5 Fig., Washington.Google Scholar
  33. Cummings, R.H. (1955b):Stacheoides, a new foraminiferal genus from the British Upper Paleozoic.—Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences,45/11, 342–346, 8 Fig., Washington.Google Scholar
  34. Cummings, R.H. (1955c):Nodosinella Brady, 1876, and associated Upper Paleozoic genera.—Micropaleontology,1/3, 221–228, 10 Fig., 1 Pl., New-York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Cushman, J.A. (1927): An outline of a re-classification of the foraminifera.—Contributions from the Cushman Laboratory for Foraminiferal Research,3/2, 122–126, Ithaca.Google Scholar
  36. Dain, L.G. and Grozdilova, L.P. (1953): Iskopaemye foraminifery SSSR: Turneyellidy i Arkhedistsidy (Fossil foraminifers of the USSR: Tournayellidae and Archaediscidae; in Russian).— Trudy VNIGRI, n. ser.74, 1–115, Leningrad.Google Scholar
  37. Delvolvé, J.J., Hansotte, M. and Vachard, D. (1994): Biostratigraphy by foraminifera and algae of the Carboniferous deposits (uppermost Viséan-Serpukhovian) of the Arize Massif (Ariège, France).—N. Jb. Geol. Paläont. Abh.,192/2, 183–201, 4 Fig., Stuttgart.Google Scholar
  38. Dil, N., Termier, G., Termier, H. and Vachard, D. (1977): Contribution à l'étude stratigraphique et paléontologique du Viséen supérieur et du Namurien inférieur du bassin houiller de Zonguldak (Nord-Ouest de la Turquie).—Annales de la Société géologique de Belgique,99/2, 401–449, 7 Pl., Liège.Google Scholar
  39. Ehrenberg, C.G. (1854): Zur Mikrogeologie.—137 p., Leipzig (Voss).Google Scholar
  40. Einor, O.L., Nemirovskaya, T.I. and Solovieva, M.N. (eds.) (1996): European part of the USSR. In: Einor O.L. (ed.): The former USSR. In: Wagner R.H., Winkler-Prins C.F. and Granados L.F. (eds.): The Carboniferous of the World,3, 23–122, Madrid.Google Scholar
  41. Ferraresi, E. and Pasini, M. (1996): Some fossil algae from the Carboniferous of the Farma Gorge (southeastern Tuscany, Italy).—Palaeopelagos,6, 31–43, Roma.Google Scholar
  42. Filipovic, I. (ed.) (1995): Karbon Severozapadne Srbije (The Carboniferous of northwestern Serbia; in Serbian and English). —Razprave geolokog zavoda ≪Gemini≫,25, 104 p., 69 Pl., Beograd.Google Scholar
  43. Flügel, E. and Schönlaub, H.P. (1990): Exotic limestone clasts in the Carboniferous of the Carnic Alps and Nötsch.—In: Venturini, C. and Krainer, K. (eds): Field Workshop on Carboniferous to Permian sequence of the Pramollo-Nassfeld Basin (Carnic Alps), Proceedings, 15–19, Pramollo.Google Scholar
  44. Flügel, H.W. (1972): Revision der von F. Heritsch 1918, 1934 und A. Kuntschnig 1926 aus dem Unterkarbon von Nötsch (Nötschgraben-Gruppe) beschriebenen Rugosa.—Anz. Österr. Akad. Wiss. Wien, math.-naturw. Kl., 1972, 43–50, Wien.Google Scholar
  45. Flügel, H.W. (1990): Das voralpine Basement im Alpin-Mediterranen Belt (Überblick und Problematik).—Jb. Geol. B.-A.,133, 181–221, Wien.Google Scholar
  46. Flügel, H.W. and Kodsi, M.G. (1968): Lithofazielle Untersuchungen im Karbon von Nötsch (Kärnten).—Anz. Österr. Akad. Wiss. Wien, math.-naturw. Kl., 1968, 1–5, Wien.Google Scholar
  47. Flügel, H.W. and Kodsi, M.G. (1971): Das Karbon von Nötsch im Gailtal (Kärnten).—In: Exkursion V Karbon und Perm der Ostalpen in Österreich (Kärnten), Italien und Jugoslawien: marines Unterkarbon (Visé), limnisches und marines Oberkarbon, marines Perm.—7. Intern. Kongr. Strat. Geol. Karbon, Krefeld 1971, 6–11.Google Scholar
  48. Fontaine, H., Ibrahim, A. ben, Khoo, H.P., Nguyen, D.T. and Vachard, D. (1994): TheNeoschwagerina andYabeina-Lepidolina zones in Peninsular Malaysia, and Dzhulfian and Dorashamian in Peninsular Malaysia, the transition to the Triassic.—Geological Survey of Malaysia, Geological Papers,4, 175 p., 50 Pl., Ipoh.Google Scholar
  49. Frisch, W. and Neubauer, F. (1989): Pre-Alpine terranes and tectonic zoning in the eastern Alps.—Geol. Soc. Am., Spec. Paper,230, 91–100, Boulder.Google Scholar
  50. Frisch, W., Menot, R.-P., Neubauer, F. and Raumer, J.F. von (1990): Correlation and evolution of the Alpine basement. Schweiz.—Mineral. Petrogr. Mitt.,70, 265–285, Wien.Google Scholar
  51. Ganelina, R.A. (1951): Eoshtaffelly i millerelly vizeyskogo i namyurskogo yarusov nizhnego Karbona zapadnogo kryla podmoskovnoy kotloviny. In: Stratigrafiya i mikrofauna nizhnego Karbona zapadnogo kryla podmoskovnoy kotloviny (Eostaffella andMillerella from the stages Viséan and Namurian of early Carboniferous in northwestern areas of Moscow Depression; in Russian).—Trudy VNIGRI, new ser.,56, Microfauna USSR,4, 179–207, 3 Pl., Leningrad.Google Scholar
  52. Garwood, E.J. (1914): Some new rock-building organisms from the Lower Carboniferous beds of Westmorland.—Geological Magazine,51, 265–271, 2 Pl., Hertford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Garwood, E.J. (1931): Important addition to our knowledge of the fossil calcareous algae since 1913 (presidential address).— Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc.,87, 97–156, Pl. 7–16, London.Google Scholar
  54. Gibshman, N.B. and Akhmetshina, L.Z. (1991): Micropaleontologic basis for determination of the Mid-Carboniferous boundary in the North Caspian Syneclise, USSR.—Courier Forsch.-Inst. Senckenberg,130, 273–295, 5 Pl., Frankfurt.Google Scholar
  55. Glintzboeckel, C. and Rabaté, J. (1964): Microfaunes et microfaciès du Permo-carbonifère du Sud-Tunisien.—International Sedim. Petro. Series,7, 45 p., 108 Pl., Leiden.Google Scholar
  56. Granier, B.R.C. and Grgasovic, T. (2000): Les algues dasycladales du Permien et du Trias; nouvelle tentative d'inventaire bibliographique, géographique et stratigraphique.—Geologica Croatica,53/1, 1–197, 26 Fig., Zagreb.Google Scholar
  57. Groessens, E. (1983): Considérations sur l'âge de l'encrinite de Tramaka.—Bulletin de la Société belge de Géologie,92/3, 225–235, Bruxelles.Google Scholar
  58. Groves, J.R. (1988): Calcareous foraminifers from the Bashkirian stratotype (Middle Carboniferous, South Urals), and their significance for intercontinental correlations and the evolution of the Fusulinidae.—Journal of Paleontology,62/3, 368–399, 17 Fig., Tulsa.Google Scholar
  59. Hahn, G. and Hahn, R. (1987): Trilobiten aus dem Karbon von Nötsch und aus den Karnischen Alpen Österreichs.—Jb. Geol. B.-A.,129, 567–619, Wien.Google Scholar
  60. Hance, L. (1988): Le Moliniacien du synclinorium de Dinant (Belgique), de la région dinantaise à la vallée de l'Ourthe.— Mémoires de l'Institut géologique de l'Université de Louvain,33, 91 p., 25 Pl., Louvain-la-Neuve.Google Scholar
  61. Heritsch, F. (1934): Rugose Korallen aus dem Unterkarbon von Nötsch im Gailtal (Kärnten).—N. Jb. Miner., Geol., Paläont., B,71 (1933), 139–164, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
  62. Homann, W. (1972): Unter- und tief-mittelpermische Kalkalgen aus den Rattendorfer Schichten, dem Trogkofel Kalk und dem Tressdorfer Kalk der Karnischen Alpen (Österreich).— Senckenbergiana Lethaea,53/3–4, 135–313, 10 Pl., Frankfurt am Main.Google Scholar
  63. Howchin, W. (1888): Additions to the knowledge of the Carboniferous foraminifera.—Royal Micro. Soc. London Jour.,2, 533–545, London.Google Scholar
  64. Ivanova, R.M. (1973): Bashkirkiy yarusa vostchnogo sklona Yuzhnogo Urala (Bashkirian stage of eastern slope of southern Urals; in Russian). In: Sbornik po voprosam stratigrafii,15 (Kamennougolnye otlozheniya vostochnogo sklona Yuzhnogo Urala).—Akad. Nauk SSSR, Uralski Nauchnyi Tsentr, Trudy Inst. Geol. i Geokhim.,82, 87–102, Sverdlovsk.Google Scholar
  65. Johnson, H.L. (1946): Lime-secreting algae from the Pennsylvanian and Permian of Kansas.—Bull. Geol. Soc. America,57, 1080–1120, New-York.Google Scholar
  66. Johnson, J.H. (1961): Limestone-building algae and algal limestones. —Colorado School Mines, Spec. Publ., 297 p., Boulder.Google Scholar
  67. Kagarmanov, A.Kh. and Donakova, L.M. (1990): Reshenie mezhvedomstennogo regionalnogo stratigraficheskogo soveshchaniya po srednemu i verkhnemu Paleozoyu Russkoi Platformy (Decisions of the interdepartemental regional stratigraphic conferences on the middle and late Paleozoic of the Russian Platform; in Russian), Leningrad 1988, Kamennougolnaya Sistema (System Carboniferous).—Trudy VSEGEI, 92 Fig., Leningrad.Google Scholar
  68. Kiparisova, L.D., Markovsky, B.P. and Radchenko, G.P. (1956): Materialy po paleontologii, novye semeystva i rody (Material for paleontology, new families and genera).—Trudy VSEGEI, n. ser., paleontologiya12, 354 p., Leningrad.Google Scholar
  69. Kodsi, M.G. and Flügel, H.W. (1970): Lithofazies und Gliederung des Karbons von Nötsch. Carinthia II,160/80, 7–17. Klagenfurt.Google Scholar
  70. Koninck, L.G. de (1873): Recherches sur les animaux; 2: Monographiedes fossiles carbonifères de Bleibergen Carinthie. —116 p., Bruxelles-Bonn.Google Scholar
  71. Kosenko, Z.A., Petrosian, N.M. and Chumenko, S.I. (1972): (New fossil algae from Ukraine and western Siberia; in Russian).—In: Zanina I.E., New species of plants and fossil invertebrate of USSR.—Akad. Nauk SSSR, Izdat. Nauka, 293–296, Moskva.Google Scholar
  72. Krainer, K. (1992): Fazies, Sedimentationsprozesse und Paläogeographie im Karbon der Ost- und Südalpen. Jb. Geol. B.-A.,135, 99–193, WienGoogle Scholar
  73. Krainer, K. (1993): Late- and Post-Variscan Sediments of the Eastern and Southern Alps. In: Raumer J.F. von and Neubauer F. (eds.): Pre-Mesozoic Geology in the Alps.—537–564, Berlin (Springer).Google Scholar
  74. Krainer, K. and Mogessie, A. (1991): Composition and significance of resedimented amphibolite breaccias and conglomerates (Badstub-Formation) in the Carboniferous of Nötsch (Eastern Alps, Austria).—Jb. Geol. B.-A.134, 65–81, Wien.Google Scholar
  75. Krestovnikov, V.N. and Teodorovich, G.I. (1936): Novyi vid rodaArchaediscus iz Karbona Yuzhnogo Urala (NewArchaediscus species in the Carboniferous of southern Urals; in Russian).— Byull. Mosk. Obshch. Ispitat. Prirody, Otdel. Geol.,44/1, 86–90, Moskva.Google Scholar
  76. Kulagina, E.I., Rumyantseva, Z.S., Pazukhin, V.N. and Kochetova, N.N. (1992): Granitza nizhnego-srednego Karbonana Yuzhnom Urale i Srednem Tyan-Shane (Boundary early-middle Carboniferous in southern Urals and central Tian-Shan; in Russian).— Rossiiskaya Akademiya Nauk, Uralskoe Otdelenie, Bashkirskii Nauchnyi Tsentr, Institut Geologii, «Nauka», 1–109, 32 Pl., Moskva.Google Scholar
  77. Kulik, E.L. (1973): Cyanophyta. In: Einor O.L. (ed.): Stratigrafiya i fauna kamennougolnykh otlozhenii reki Shartym (Stratigraphy and fauna from the Carboniferous of Shartym river: in russian).—Uralskoe Geologischeskoe Upravlenie, Izdat. «Vishcha Shkola», Gozud Univ, 39–48, Pl. 1–4, Lvov.Google Scholar
  78. Laloux, M. (1988). Foraminifères du Viséen supérieur et du Namurien du bassin franco-belge.—Bull Société belge de Géologie,96/3 (1987), 205–220, Pl. 1–4, Bruxelles.Google Scholar
  79. Lisrak, J.L. and Ross, C.A. (1997): Foraminifera and associated faunas, lower Carboniferous-lower Permian Chilliwack Group, Black Mountain, Northwest Washington.—In: Ross, C.A., Ross, J.R.P. and Brenckle P.L. (eds.): Late Paleozoic foraminifers, their biostratigraphy, evolution and paleoecology, and the mid-Carboniferous boundary.—Cushman Foundation for Foraminiferal Research, Special Publication36, 86–93, 1 Pl., Cambridge MA.Google Scholar
  80. Makhlina, M.K., Vdovenko, M.V., Alekseev, A.S., Byrsheva, T.V., Donakova, L.M., Zhulitova, V.E., Kononova, L.I., Umnova, N.J. and Chik, E.M. (1993): Nizhnii Karbon Moskovskoi sineklizy i Voronezhskoi anteclizy (Early Carboniferous of the Moscow Synclise and Voronezh Anteklise; in Russian).—Rossiiskaya Akademiya Nauk, Moskovskoe Obshchestvo Ispytatelei Pridory, Komitet po Geologii i Ispolzonalniyu Nedr Pri Pravitelstve Rossiikoi Federalii, “Nauka”, 223 p. Moskva.Google Scholar
  81. Mamet, B. (1968): Sur les microfaciès calcaires du Viséen de la Montagne Noire (France).—Revue de Micropaléontologie,11/ 3, 121–136, 5 Pl., Paris.Google Scholar
  82. Mamet, B. and Herbig, H. (1990): The algaePseudodonezella n. gen. andEovelobitella occitanica Vachard, 1974 from Southern Spain (Carboniferous, Betic Cordillera).—Revista Española de Micropaleontología,22/1, 199–211, 4 Pl., Madrid.Google Scholar
  83. Mamet, B. and Pinard, S. (1992): Note sur la taxonomie des petits foraminifères du Paléozoïque supérieur.—Bulletin de la Société belge de Géologie,99 (1990, 373–398, Bruxelles.Google Scholar
  84. Mamet, B. and Roux, A. (1975a): Algues dévoninnes et carbonifères de la Téthys occidentale, Troisième partie.— Revue de Micropaléontologie,18/3, 134–187, 15 Pl., Paris.Google Scholar
  85. Mamet, B. and Roux, A. (1975b): Dasycladales dévoniennes et carbonifères de la Téthys occidentale.—Revista Española de Micropaleontología,7/2, 245–295, 13 Pl., Madrid.Google Scholar
  86. Mamet, B. and Roux, A (1977): Algues rouges dévoniennes et carbonifères de la Téthys occidentale, Quatrième partie.— Revue de Micropaléontologie,19/4, 215–266, 13 Fig., 9 Pl., ParisGoogle Scholar
  87. Memet, B. and Roux, A. (1978): Algues viséennes et namuriennes du Tennessee (Etats-Unis).—Revue de Micropaléontologie,21/2, 68–97, Pl. 1–7, Paris.Google Scholar
  88. Mamet, B. and Roux, A. and Nassichuk, W. (1987): Algues carbonifères et permiennes de l'Arctique Canadien.—Geological Survey of Canada,342, 143 p., 30 Pl., Ottawa.Google Scholar
  89. Mamet, B. and Rudloff, B. (1972): Algues carbonifères de la partie septentrionale de l'Amérique du Nord.—Revue de Micropaléontologie,15/2, 75–114, 10 Pl., Paris.Google Scholar
  90. Marfenkova, M.M. (1978): Foraminifery i stratigrafiya nizhnego i srednego Vize Yuzhnogo Kazakhstana (Foraminifers and stratigraphy of the lower and middle Viséan of southern Kazakhstan; in Russian).—In: Dubatolov V.N. and Yuferev O.V. (eds.): Biostratigrafiya i paleobiogeografiya Devona i Karbona aziatskoi chasti SSSR (Devonian and Carboniferous biostratigraphy of the asiatic part of the USSR).—Akademiya Nauk SSSR, Sibirskoe Otdelenie, Trudy Instituta Geologii i Geofiziki,386, 78–99, Novosibirsk.Google Scholar
  91. Marfenkova, M.M. (1983): Arkhedistsidy iz vizeiskikh i serpukovskikh otlozhenii Kazakhstana (Archaediscids in Viséan and Serpukhovian deposits of Kazakhstan; in Russian).— Kazak. SSR Filim Akademiya, Khabarlary, Izvest. Akad. Nauk Kazakh. SSR, ser. geol.,3, 42–52, Alma-Ata.Google Scholar
  92. Marfenkova, M.M. (1991): Morskoi Karbon Kazakhstana (Marine Carboniferous from Kazakhstan; in Russian).—Akademiya Nauk Kazakhskoi SSR, Institut Geologicheskikh Nauk, «Zylym»,1: 197 p., 20 Fig.;2: 150 p., 24 Pl., Alma-Ata.Google Scholar
  93. Martini, R. and Zaninetti, L. (1988): Structure et paléobiologie du foraminifèreLasiodiscus Reichel, 1946: étude d'après le matériel du Permien supérieur de Grèce.—Revue de Paléobiologie,7/2, 289–300, 3 Pl., Genève.Google Scholar
  94. Maslo, A. and Vachard, D. (1997): Inventaire critique des Eostaffellinae (foraminifères) du Carbonifère.—Revue de Micropaléontologie,40/1, 39–69, 2 Fig., Paris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Massa, D. and Vachard, D. (1979): Le Carbonifère de Lybie Occidentale: biostratigraphie et micropaléontologie; position dans le domaine téthysien d'Afrique du Nord.—Revue de l'Institut Français du Pétrole,34/1, 3–65, 19 Fig., 9 Pl., Paris.Google Scholar
  96. Mikhailov, A. (1939): (To the characteristics of the genera of lower Carboniferous foraminifera on the territory of the USSR).—In: The lower Carboniferous deposits of the north-western limb of Moscow basin; in Russian).—Leningrad Geol. Admin., Symposium,3, 47–62, 4 Pl., Leningrad.Google Scholar
  97. Miklukho-Maclay, A.D. (1960): Novye rannekamennougolnye Arkhedistsidy (New early Carboniferous Archaediscids; in Russian).—In: Novye vidy drevnikh rasteniy i bespozvonochnykh SSSR.—Trudy VSEGEI, Gozgotekhizdat,1, 149–151, Leningrad.Google Scholar
  98. Moeller, V. von (1878): Die Spiral-gewundenen Foraminiferen des rüssischen Kohlenkalks.—Mémoires de l'Académie Impériale des Sciences de St Pétersbourg, 7e séries,25/9, 1–147, 6 text-Fig., 15 Pl., Saint Pétersbourg.Google Scholar
  99. Moeller, V. von (1879): Die Foraminiferen der rüssischen Kohlenkalk.—Mèmoires de l'Académie Impériale des Sciences de St. Petersbourg, 7e série,27/5, 1–131, 30 text-Fig., 7 Pl., Saint Pétersbourg.Google Scholar
  100. Moore, C. (1870): Report on mineral veins in Carboniferous limestone and their organic contain.—Rep. Brit. Assoc. for the Advancement of Science, 39th Meeting Exeter 1869, 360–388.Google Scholar
  101. Neslter, H. (1973): The types ofTetrataxis conica Ehrenberg, 1854 andTetrataxis paleotrochus (Ehrenberg, 1854).—Micropaleontology,19/3, 366–369, 1 Pl., New-York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Neubauer, F. (1988): The Variscan orogeny in the Austroalpine and Southalpine domains of the Eastern Alps. Schweiz.— Mineral. Petrogr. Mitt.,68, 339–349, Wien.Google Scholar
  103. Pasini, M. (1980a): I Fusulinidi della valle del torrente Farma (Toscana meridionale).—Mem. Soc. Geol. It.,20, 323–342, Roma.Google Scholar
  104. Pasini, M. (1980b): Gli Archaeodiscidi dell’affioramento di Poggio alle pigne nella Valle del Farma (Toscana meridionale).—Mem. Soc. Geol. It.,20, 343–346, Roma.Google Scholar
  105. Perret, M.F. (1993): Recherches micropalèontologiques et biostratigraphiques (Conodontes-Foraminifères) dans le Carbonifère pyrénéen.—Strata, série 2,21, 597, p., 160 Fig., 10+13 Pl., Toulouse.Google Scholar
  106. Perret, M.F. and Vachard, D. (1977): Algues et Pseudo-algues des calcaires serpoukhoviens d'Ardengost (Hautes-Pyrénées).— Annales de Paléontologie (Invertébrés),63/2, 85–156, 10 Pl., Paris.Google Scholar
  107. Phillips, J. (1846): On the remains of microscopic, animals in the rocks of Yorkshire.—proceedings of the Geological and Polytechnic Society of the West Riding of Yorkshire,2, 274–285, Pl. 7, Leeds.Google Scholar
  108. Pinard, S. and Mamet, B. (1998): Taxonomie des petits formainifères du Carbonifère supérieur-Permien inférieur du bassin de Sverdrup, Arctique canadien.—Palaeontographica Canadiana,15, 253 p., 43 Pl., Calgary.Google Scholar
  109. Pirlet, H. and Conil, R. (1974): L'évolution des Archaediscidae viséens.—Bull. Soc. belge Géologie,82/2 (dated: 1973, published: 1977, preprint: 1974), 241–299, 5 Fig., 3 Pl., Bruxelles.Google Scholar
  110. Plummer, H.J. (1930): Calcareous Foraminifera in the Brownwood shale near Bridgeport, Texas.—Univ. Texas Bull.,3019, 5–21, 1 Pl., Austin.Google Scholar
  111. Poletaev, V.I., Brazhnikova, N.E., Vasilyuk, N.P. and Vdovenko, M.V. (1991): Local zones and major lower Carboniferous biostratigraphic boundaries of the Donets basin (Donbass), Ukraine, USSR.—Couerier Forsch.-Inst. Senckenberg,130, 47–59, Frankfurt.Google Scholar
  112. Popova, Z.G. and Reitlinger, E.A. (1973): Foraminifera. In: Einor O.L. (ed.): Stratigrafiya i fauna kamennougolnykh otlozhenii reki Shartym (Stratigraphy and fauna from the Carboniferous of Shartym river; in Russian).—Uralskoe Geologicheskoe Upravlenie, Izdat. «Vishcha Shkola», Gozud Univ., 39–48, 41 Pl., Lvov.Google Scholar
  113. Potievskaya, P. D. (1958): Foraminiferi verkhnobashkirskikh vidkladiv zakhidnoï chastini Donetskogo baseinu (Foraminifers of the late Bashkirian deposits of the western part of the Donetz Basin; in Ukrainian).—Akademiya Nauk Ukrainskoi SSR, Trudy Instituta Geologicheskikh Nauk, seriya stratigrafii i paleontologii,31, 91 p., 7 Pl., Kiev.Google Scholar
  114. Potievskaya, P.D. (1964): Nekotorye fuzulinidy i melkie foraminifery Bashkirkikh, otlozhenii bolshogo Donbassa (Some fusulinids and small foraminifers in the Bashkir deposits of the greater Donets Basin; in Russian).—In: Aizenverg D.E. (ed.): Materialy k faune verkhnego Paleozoya Donbassa (Materials for late Paleozoic fauna of Donbass).—Akademiya Nauk Ukrainskoi SSR, Trudy Instituta Geologicheskikh Nauk, seriya stratigrafii i paleontologii,48/2, 31–59, 5 Pl., Kiev.Google Scholar
  115. Racz, L. (1964): Carboniferous calcareous algae and their association in the San Emiliano and Lois-Ciguera Formations (Province Leon, N.W. Spain).—Leidse Geol. Meded.,31, 112 p., 26 Fig., 13 Pl., Leiden.Google Scholar
  116. Racz, L.G. (1984):Iberiaella, a new fossil alga from the Middle Carboniferous of NW Spain.—Geologie en Mijnbouw,16, 333–336, 1 Pl., Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  117. Rauzer-Chernousova, D.M. (1948a): Nekotorye novye vidy foraminifer iz nizhnekamennougolnykh otlozhenii Podmoskovnogo basseina (Some new species of foraminifers from the early Carboniferous deposits of the Submoscovite basin; in Russian). —Akademiya Nauk SSSR, Trudy Instituta Geologicheskikh Nauk,62, geologischeskaya seriya,19, 227–238, Pl. 15–17, Moskva.Google Scholar
  118. Rauzer-Chernousova, D.M. (1948b): Materialy k faune foraminifer kamennougolnykh otlozhenii Tsentralnogo Kazakhstana (Materials for foraminiferal fauna from the Carboniferous deposits from central Kazakhstan; in Russian).—Akademiya Nauk SSSR, Trudy Instituta Geologicheskikh Nauk,66, geologicheskaya seriya,21, 1–66, 3 Pl. Moskva.Google Scholar
  119. Rauzer-Chernousova, D.M. and Fursenko, A.V. (1937): Opredelitel foraminifer neftenosnykh raionov SSSR (Determination of foraminifers from the petroliferous regions of the USSR; in Russian).—Glavnaya Redaktsya Gorno-Toplivnoi Literatury, 1–315, 241 Fig., Leningrad-Moskva.Google Scholar
  120. Rauzer-Chernousova, D.M., Kireeva, G.D., Leontovich, G.E., Gryzlova, N.D., Safonova, T.P. and Chernova, E.I. (1951): Srednekamennougolnye fusulinidy Russkoi Platformy i sopredelnykh oblastei (Middle Carboniferous fusulinid from Russian Platform and adjacent areas; in Russian).—Akademiya Nauk SSSR, Institut Geologicheshikh Nauk, 1–380, 58 Pl., Moskva.Google Scholar
  121. Rauzer-Chernousova, D.M., Bensh, E.R., Vdovenko, M.V., Gibshman, M.N., Leven, E.Ya., Lipina, O.A., Reitlinger, E.A., Solovieva, M.N. and Chediya, I.O. (1996): Spratnochnik po sistematike foraminifer Paleozoya; Endothyroidy, Fusulinoidy (Guide for the systematics of the Paleozoic foraminifera; Endothyrids and Fusulinids; in Russian).—Rossiiskaya Akademiya Nauk, Geologicheskii Institut. «Nauka», 207 p., 48 Pl., Moskva.Google Scholar
  122. Reitlinger, E.A. (1950): Foraminifery srednekamennougolnykh otlozhenii tsentralnoi chasti Russkoi platformy (isklyuchaya semeistvo Fusulinidae) [Foraminifers from Middle Carboniferous of the central part of the Russian Platform (excepting the family Fusulinidae) (in Russian; French translation BRGM no 1456)].—Akademiya Nauk SSSR, Trudy Geologicheskogo Instituta,126, geologichevskaya seriya47, 1–127, 15 Fig., 22 Pl., Moskva.Google Scholar
  123. Reitlinger, E.A. (1956): Novoe semeistvo Lasiodiscidae (New family Lasiodiscidae; in Russian; French translation BRGM no1753)—Voprosy Mikropaleontologii,1, 69–78, 2 Pl., Moskva.Google Scholar
  124. Reitlinger, E.A. (1971): Nekotorye voprosy sistematiki b svete etapnosti razvitiya verkhnepaleozoiskikh foraminifer (Some problems of systematics in the light of the evolutionary etaps of the late Paleozoic foraminifers; in Russian).—Voprosy Mikropaleontologii,14, 3–16, Moskva.Google Scholar
  125. Reitlinger, E.A. (1980): K voprosii o, granitse Bogdanovskogo i Krasnopolyanskogo gorizontov (foraminifery zonyHomoceras) (On the problem of the boundary between the Bogdanovsky and Krasnopoliansky horizons and on the foraminifers of theHomoceras zone; in Russian).—Voprosy Mikropalecontologii,23, 23–38, 4 Pl., Moskva.Google Scholar
  126. Rich, M. (1980): Carboniferous calcareous foraminifera from northeastern Alabama, south-central Tennessee, and north-western Georgia.—Cushman Foundation for Foraminiferal Research, special publication,18, 1–62, 22 Pl., Washington.Google Scholar
  127. Roux, A. (1979): Révision du genreEpimastopora “Pia, 1922” (Dasycladaceae).—Bull. Centr. Rech. Explor.-Prod. Elf-Aquitaine3/2, 803–810, 1 Fig., Pau.Google Scholar
  128. Roux, A. (1985): Introduction à l'étude des algues fossiles paléozoïques (de la bactérie à la tectonique des plaques).—Bull. Centres Rech. Explor.-Prod. Elf-Aquitaine,9/2, 465–699, 50 Fig., 5 tabl., 6 Pl. Pau.Google Scholar
  129. Roux, A. (1989): Study of aParaepimastopora kansasensis (Dasyclad alga) topotypical material from the Upper Pennsylvanian of Kansas, U.S.A..—Revue de Paléobiologie,8/2, 323–333, Genève.Google Scholar
  130. Rumyantseva, Z.S. (1970): Stratigrafiya i foraminifery namyurskikh i nizhnebashkirskikh otlozhenii sistemy Chatkalskikh Gor (Stratigraphy and foraminifers from the Namurian and early Bashkirian deposits of the Chatkal Mountains; in Russian). In: Kuzichkina, Yu.M.: Biostratigrafiya osadochnykh obrazovanii Uzbekistana (Biostratigraphy of the Uzbekistan sedimentary formations; in Russian). Tashk. Geol. Trest, Tashk. KomPl. Geol. Poisk. Eksped. Izdat «Nedra», Sbornik9, 138–184, 13 Pl., Leningrad.Google Scholar
  131. Saltovskaya, V.D. (1984): Nekotorye izvestkovye vodorosli Paleozoya Tadzhikistana (Some calcareous algae from the Paleozoic of Tadzhikistan; in Russian). In: Dzhalilov, M.R. (ed.): Noyes vidy iskopaemoi flory i fauny Tadzhikistana (New species of fossil flora and fauna from Tadzhikistan).— Akademiya Nauk Tadzhiskoi SSR, Institut Geologii, 141–160, Pl. 30–39, Dushambe.Google Scholar
  132. Saurin, E. (1961): Foraminifères dinantiens du Laos.—Annales de la Faculté des Sciences de Saïgon, 199–230, Pl. 1–7, Saïgon.Google Scholar
  133. Schönlaub, H.P. (1985): Das Karbon von Nötsch und sein Rahmen. Jb. Geol. B.-A.,127, 673–692, Wien.Google Scholar
  134. Schraut, G. (1996): Die Arthropoden aus dem Unterkarbon von Nötsch (Kärnten/Österreich).—Abh. Geol. B.-A.,51, 1–193, Wien.Google Scholar
  135. Schraut, G. (1999): Paläofaunistische Untersuchungen aus dem Unter-Karbon von Nötsch (Kärnten, Österreich), Teil 2: Cephalopoda (Nautiloidea, Ammonoidea), Crustacea (Phyllocarida), Echinoidea.—Jb. Geol. B.-A.,141, 503–517, Wien.Google Scholar
  136. Sebbar, A. (1997): Blostratigraphie (foraminifères) du Carbonifère moyen, bassin de «Bechar-Mezarif», Algérie.—Annales de la Société géologique de Belgique,120/2, 205–215, Liège.Google Scholar
  137. Sebbar, A. (1998): Foraminifères et algues calcaires du Carbonifère, bassin de Reggane, Sahara central, Algérie.—Bulletin du Service géologique de l'Algérie,9/2, 123–147, Alger.Google Scholar
  138. Sebbar, A. and Mamet, B. (1999): Algues benthiques calcaires du Carbonifére inférieur et moyen, bassin de Béchar, Algérie.— Revue de Micropaléontologie,39/2, 153–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  139. Sebbar, A. and Mamet, B. (1999): Algues benthiques calcaires et incertae sedis du Carbonifére, bassin de «Béchar-Mezarif», Algérie, sedimentologique.—Revue de Micropaléontologie,42/1, 71–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  140. Sebbar, A., Préat A. and Mamet, B. (2000): Microfaciès et biozonation de la rampe mixte carbonifère du bassin de Tindouf, Algérie.—Bull. Centre Rech. Elf Explor. Prod.,22/2, 203–239, Pau.Google Scholar
  141. Sieber, R. (1972): Zur Paläoökologie der unterkarbonischen Bivalenfauna von Nötsch (S. Bleiberg) in Kärnten.—Ann. Naturhist. Mus. Wien,76, 491–498, Wien.Google Scholar
  142. Skompski, S. (1986): Upper Viséan calcareous algae from the Lublin Coal Basin.—Acta Geologica Polonica,36/1–3, p. 251–280, Pl. 1–18, Warsawa.Google Scholar
  143. Skompski, S. (1996): Stratigraphic position and facies significance of the limestone bands in the subsurface Carboniferous succession of the Lublin Upland.—Acta Geologica Polonica,46/3–4, 171–268, Warszawa.Google Scholar
  144. Strank, A.R.E. (1983): New stratigraphically significant Foraminifera from the Dinantian of Great Britain.—Paleontology,26/2, 435–442, Pl 54–55, London.Google Scholar
  145. Termier, H., Termier, G. and Vachard, D. (1975): Recherches micropaléontologiques dans le Paléozoïque supérieur du Maroc Central.—Cahiers de Micropaléontologie,4, 99 p., 18 Fig., 10 Pl., Paris.Google Scholar
  146. Termier, G., Termier, H. and Vachard, D. (1977): Etude comparative de quelques Ischyrosponges.—Géologie Méditerrannéenne,4/2, 139–180, 7 Pl., Marseille.Google Scholar
  147. Tessensohn, F. (1972): Eingeneue Beobactungen im Karbon von Nötsch, Kärnten.—Carinthia II,162/82, 143–147, Klagenfurt.Google Scholar
  148. Ueno, K. and Nakazawa, T. (1993): Carboniferous foraminifers from the Iowermost part of the Omi Limestone Group, Niigata Prefecture, central Japan.—Science Reports of the Institute of Geoscience, University of Tsukuda section B,14, 1–51, 15 Fig., Tsukuba.Google Scholar
  149. Vachard, D. (1976): Algues et pseudo-algues du Viséen-Serpoukhovien du Sud de la France.—Annales de la Société géologique du Nord,96, 4, 139–180, Villeneuve d'Ascq.Google Scholar
  150. Vachard, D. (1980): Téthys et Gondwana au Paléozoïque supérieur-Les données afghanes: biostratigraphie, micropaléontologie, paléogéographie.—Documents et Travaus IGAL,2, 2 vol., 463 p., 75 Fig., 50 tabl., 35 Pl., Paris.Google Scholar
  151. Vachard, D. (1988): Pour une classification raisonnée et raisonnable des Archaediscidae (Foraminifera, Carbonifère inférieurmoyen). —Revue de Paléobiologie, Genève, vol. spec.2, Benthos'86, 103–123, 3 Fig., 2 Pl., Genève.Google Scholar
  152. Vachard, D. (1991): Parathuramminides et Moravamminides (Microproblematica) de l'Emsien supérieur de la Formation Moniello (Cordillères Cantabriques, Espagne).—Revue de Paléobiologie,10/2, 255–299, 5 Pl., Genève.Google Scholar
  153. Vachard, D. (1993): Algues, pseudo-algues et microfaciès carbonatés du Dévonien du Domaine Ligérien (Massif Armoricain, France).—Palaeontographica, B,229/1–3, 53–113, 7 Pl., Stuttgart.Google Scholar
  154. Vachard, D. and Beckary, S. (1991): Algues et Foraminifères backiriens des coal balls de la Mine Rosario (Truebano, Léon, Espagne).—Revue de Paléobiologie,10/2, 315–357, 5 Pl., Genève.Google Scholar
  155. Vachard, D. and Berkhli, M. (1992): Importance des coupes du Bassin de Jerada (Maroc) pour la connaissance du passage Asbien/Brigantien (Viséen supérieur).—Revue de Micropaléontologie,35/4, 307–328, 4 Pl., Paris.Google Scholar
  156. Vachard, D., Delvolvé, J.J. and Hansotte, M. (1991a): Foraminifères, algues et pseudo-algues du Serpoukhovien du Massif de l'Arize (Carbonifère inférieur des Pyrénées).—Geobios,24/3, 251–256, 1 Pl., Lyon.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  157. Vachard, D., Laveine, J.P., Zhang, S.Z., Deng, G. and Lemoigne, Y. (1991b): Calcareous microfossils (Foraminifers, Algae, Pseudo-algae) from the Uppermost Viséan of Jiu Hu near Guangzhou (Canton) People's Republic of China.—Geobios,24/4, 675–681, 1 Pl., Lyon.Google Scholar
  158. Vachard, D. and Maslo, A. (1996): Précisions biostratigraphiques et micropaléontologiques sur le Bashkirien d'Ukraine (Carbonifère moyen).—Revue de Paléobiologie,15/2, 357–383, 3 Pl., Genève.Google Scholar
  159. Vachard, D. and Montenat, C. (1996): The Carboniferous of Afghanistan.—In: Wagner, R.H., Winkler Prins, C.F. and Granados, LF. (eds.): The Carboniferous of the World,3, 461–489. 6 Pl., Madrid.Google Scholar
  160. Vachard, D., Perret, M.F. and Delvolvé, J.J. (1989): Algues, pseudo-algues et foraminifères des niveaux baschkiriens dans les secteurs d'Escarra et Aragon Subordan (Pyrénées aragonaises, Espagne).—Geobios,22/6, 697–723, 3 Fig., 5 Pl., Lyon.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  161. Vai, G.B. and Cocozza, T. (1986): Tentative schematic zonation of the Hercynian chain in Italy.—Bull. Soc. Géol. France, (8),2, 1, 95–114, Paris.Google Scholar
  162. Vdovenko, M.V., Rauzer-Chernousova, D.M., Reitlinger, E.A. and Sabirov, A.A. (1993): Spravochnik po sistematike melkikh foraminifer paleozoya (Guide for the systematics of Paleozoic smaller foraminifers; in Russian).—Rossiiskaya Akademiya Nauk, Komissiya po Mikropaleontologii, «Nauka», 1–128, Moskva.Google Scholar
  163. Vissarinova, A.Ya. (1948): Nekotorye vidy podsemeitsva Tetrataxinae Galloway iz vizeskogo yarusa evropeiskoi chasti Soyuza (Some species of the subfamily Tetrataxinae Galloway from the Viséan of the European part of the Union; in Russian). —Akademiya Nauk SSSR, Trudy Instituta Geologicheskikh Nauk,62, geologicheskaya serieya19, 190–195, Moskva.Google Scholar
  164. Wood, A. (1964): A new Dasycladacean alga,Nanopora, from the lower Carboniferous of England and Kazakhstan.— Palaeonotology,7/2, 181–185, London.Google Scholar
  165. Yochelson, E.L. and Schönlaub, H.P. (1993): Gastropod from the Carboniferous of Nötsch (Carinthia, Austria).—Jb. Geol. B.-a.136, 277–283, Wien.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Institut für Palaentologie, Universitat Erlangen 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Karl Krainer
    • 1
  • Daniel Vachard
    • 2
  1. 1.Institut für Geologie und PaläontologieInnsbruck UniversitätInnsbruck
  2. 2.Université des Sciences et Technologies de LilleUFR des Sciences de la Terre, UPRESA 8014 du CNRSVilleneuve d’Ascq CédexFrance

Personalised recommendations