Journal of the American Oil Chemists’ Society

, Volume 63, Issue 9, pp 1192–1196 | Cite as

Chemical evaluation of egyptian citrus seeds as potential sources of vegetable oils

  • M. A. Habib
  • M. A. Hammam
  • A. A. Sakr
  • Y. A. Ashoush


Seeds of the citrus fruits orange, mandarin, lime and grapefruit were analyzed. Petroleum ether-extracted oils of such seeds amounted to more than 40% of each. Physical and chemical properties of the extracted oils are presented. Samples of the extracted oils were saponified and the unsaponifiables and fatty acid fractions isolated. The isolated unsaponifiables and fatty acids were analyzed by GLC. GLC analysis of the unsaponifiables revealed compositional patterns differ-ent in number, type and relative concentration of fractions according to type of citrus seed oil, depending on the solvent system used for oil extraction and unsaponifiable matter isolation. The compositional patterns of the unsaponifiables were similar to that of cottonseed oil. Mandarin and grapefruit oils are free of cholesterol. The data demonstrate that the fatty acid compositional patterns of the oils differ; Mandarin seed oil contains the largest number of fatty acids, and grapefruit seed oil contains the lowest. The total amounts of volatile fatty acids in these oils are generally higher than those of other edible oils. Lime seed oil is similar, in the degree of unsaturation, to soybean oil. The orange oil pattern is similar to cottonseed oil. The amount of total essential fatty acids in lime seed oil is the highest of the oils studied.


Squalene Tufa Compositional Pattern Total Volatile Fatty Acid Total Unsaturated Fatty Acid 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Mehta, T.N., C.V.N. Rao and K.S. Goldbole,Indian Soap J. 27:87(1955).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    French, R.B.,J. Amer. Oil Chem. Soc., 59:176 (1962).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Braddock, R.J., and J.W. Kesterson. Agric. Exp. Station Inst. Food and Agric. Sci., Florida Univ., Bull, no 756 (1973).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Abdel-Baki, M.M., and Y.M. Hassan,Res. Bull. No. 1516, Fac. Agric., Ain Shams University, Cairo (1970).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Abdo, Z.A., Ph.D. thesis, Fac. Agric., Ain Shams University, Cairo (1977).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    A.O.A.C. Official Methods of Analysis, (11th edn.), Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington, D.C. (1970).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chapman, H.D., and P.E. Pratt, Univ. Calif., Division Agric. Sci. (1961).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Jackson, U.L.,Soil Chemical Analysis, Prentice Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1958, pp. 287–289.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Vogel, A.I.,A Textbook of Organic Chemistry, 3rd edn., English Language Book Sci. and Longman Group Ltd. (1975).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Diedrichs, A.,Chem. Abs. 8:2271 (1914).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Loba, J.N.U., P.P. Martin and J.R. Iranzo,Chem. Abs. 45:10620 (1950).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Zaganiaries, S.,Chem. Abs. 45:5128 (1958).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© American Oil Chemists’ Society 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. A. Habib
    • 1
  • M. A. Hammam
    • 1
  • A. A. Sakr
    • 1
  • Y. A. Ashoush
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Soil Science, Faculty of AgricultureUniversity of MinufiyaShebin El-KomEgypt

Personalised recommendations