Annals of Biomedical Engineering

, Volume 24, Issue 3, pp 424–429

Electroencephalographic changes following low energy emission therapy

  • J. P. Lebet
  • A. Barbault
  • C. Rossel
  • Z. Tomic
  • M. Reite
  • L. Higgs
  • U. Dafni
  • D. Amato
  • B. Pasche
Article

Abstract

Low energy emission therapy (LEET) is a novel approach to delivering low levels of amplitude-modulated electromagnetic fields to the human brain. The sleep electroencephalogram (EEG) effects of a 15-min LEET treatment were investigated in a double-find cross-over study to assess sleep induction. Fifty-two healthy volunteers were exposed to both active and inactive LEET treatment sessions, with a minimum interval of 1 week between the two sessions. Baseline EEGs were obtained, and 15-min posttreatment EEGs were recorded and analyzed according to the Loomis classification. A significant increase in the duration of stage B1 sleep (0.58±2.42 min [mean±SD],p=0.046), decreased latency to the first 10 sec epoch of sleep (−1.23±5.32 min,p=0.051) and decreased latency to sleep stage B2 (−1.21±5.25 min,p=0.052) were observed after active treatment. Additionally, establishment of slow waves with progression from stages B to C was significantly more pronounced after active LEET treatment (p=0.040). A combined analysis of these results with those of an identical study performed in Denver showed that LEET had a significant effect on afternoon sleep induction and maintenance with shorter sleep latencies (decreased latency to the first 10 sec epoch of sleep; −1.00±5.51 min,p=0.033; decreased latency to sleep stage B2; −1.49±5.40 min,p=0.003), an increased duration of stage B2 (0.67±2.50 min,p=0.003), an increase in the total duration of sleep (0.69±4.21 min,p=0.049), and a more prominent establishment of slow waves with progression to a deeper sleep stage (p=0.006). It is concluded that the intermittent 42.7 HZ amplitude modulation of 27.12-MHz electromagnetic fields results in EEG changes consistent with shorter sleep latencies, longer sleep duration, and deeper sleep in healthy subjects.

Keywords

EEG Electroencephalography LEET Electromagnetic fields Electromagnetics Radio waves Sleep Sleep stages 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Adey, W. R., and A. R. Sheppard. Cell surface ionic phenomena in transmembrane signaling to intracellular enzyme systems. In:Mechanistic Approaches to Interactions of Electric and Electromagnetic Fields with Living Systems, edited by M. Blank and E. Find. New York: Plenum Press, 1987, pp. 389–397.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Adey, W. R., S. M. Bawin, and A. F. Lawrence. Effects of weak amplitude modulated microwave fields on calcium effect from awake cat cerebral cortex.Bioelectromagnetics 3:295–307, 1982.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hafner, C., and N. Kuster. Computations of electromagnetic fields by the MMP method (GMT).Radio Sci. 26: 291–97, 1991.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Higgs, L., M. Reite, A. Barbault, J. P. Lebet, C. Rossel, D. Amato, U. Dafni, and B. Pasche, Subjective, and objective relaxation effects of low energy emission therapy.Stress Med. 10:5–14, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    IEEE.IEEE Standards for Safety Levels with Respect to Human Exposure to Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields 3 kHz to 300 GHz, IEEE C95.1, Piscataway, NJ: IEEE, 1992.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Jasper, H. Report of committee on methods of clinical exam in EEG.EEG Clin. Neurophysiol. 10:370–375, 1958.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kaczmarek, L. K., and W. R. Adey. The efflux of45Ca++ and [3H]t-aminobutyric acid from cat cerebral cortex.Brain Res. 63:331–342, 1973.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kuster, N. Multiple multipole method for simulating EM problems involving biological bodies.IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 40:611–620, 1993.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lai, H., M. A. Corino, A. Horita, and A. W. Guy. Single vs. repeated microwave exposures: Effects on benzodiazepine receptors in the brain of the rat.Bioelectromagnetics 13:57–66, 1992.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Loomis, A., N. Harvey, and G. Hobart. Electrical potentials of the human brain.J. Exp. Psychol. 19:249–79, 1938.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Loomis, A., N. Harvey, and G. Hobart. Distribution of disturbance patterns in the human electroencephalogram with special reference to sleep.J. Neuropsychol. 1:413–430, 1938.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Magin, R. L., R. P. Liburdy, and B. Persson. Biological effects and safety aspects of nuclear magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy.Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 649:131–203, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Niedermeyer, E. Sleep and EEG. In:Electroencephalography, Basic Principles, Clinical Applications and Related Fields, edited by E. Niedermeyer and F. Lopes da Silva. Baltimore: Urban and Schwarzenberg, 1987, pp. 119–132.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Rechtschaffen, A., and A. Kales.A Manual of Standardized Terminology, Techniques and Scoring System for Sleep Stages of Human Subjects. NIH Publication 204. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1968.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Reite, M., L. Higgs, J. P. Lebet, A. Barbault, C. Rossel, N. Kuster, U. Dafni, D. Amato, and B. Pasche. Sleep inducting effect of low energy emission therapy.Bioelectromagnetics 15:67–75, 1994.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Reiter, R. J. Electromagnetic fields and melatonin production.Biomed. Pharmacother. 47:439–444, 1993.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Valley, V., and R. Broughton. The physiological (EEG) nature of drowsiness and its relation to performance deficits in narcoleptics.EEG Clin. Neurophysiol. 55:243–251, 1983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Biomedical Engineering Society 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. P. Lebet
    • 1
  • A. Barbault
    • 1
  • C. Rossel
    • 2
  • Z. Tomic
    • 1
  • M. Reite
    • 3
  • L. Higgs
    • 3
  • U. Dafni
    • 4
  • D. Amato
    • 4
  • B. Pasche
    • 5
  1. 1.Symtonic SA.RenensSwitzerland
  2. 2.Clinique Bon PortMontreuxSwitzerland
  3. 3.Department of PsychiatryUniversity of Colorado Health Sciences CenterDenver
  4. 4.Department of BiostatisticsHarvard School of Public HealthBoston
  5. 5.Symtonic USA, Inc.New YorkU.S.A.

Personalised recommendations