Metallurgical Transactions A

, Volume 24, Issue 5, pp 1027–1037 | Cite as

Metastable crystalline and amorphous structures formed in the Cu-W system by vapor deposition

  • H. F. Rizzo
  • T. B. Massalski
  • M. Nastasi
Alloy Phases

Abstract

The possibility of producing nonequilibrium amorphous and crystalline phases in the Cu-W system is of interest because, under equilibrium conditions, no mutual solubility is expected between Cu and W. Triode sputtered coatings (45 to 150 μm thick, produced at deposition rates between 20 and 150 Å/s) consisted of amorphous and metastable crystalline phases. The latter remained decomposition-resistant on heating to various temperatures between 340 °C and 600 °C (the maximum temperature of exposure). The amorphous phase in such coatings crystallized on heating into a metastable body-centered cubic (bcc) phase, and the crystallization temperatureT x was found to decrease across the phase diagram from 450 °C to 340 °C as the percentage of W increased from 26 to 60 at. pct. Samples containing amorphous phase regions, when subjected to heating between 150 °C and 250 °C, showed an unusual rapid precipitation of Cu at the sample surface, indicating an easy diffusion of the Cu component. This occurred without crystallization of the remaining slightly tungsten-enriched amorphous matrix. Microhardness measurements in sputtered two-phase amorphous and bcc regions have shown that in alloys of the same composition, the amorphous phase was always softer than the bcc solid solution phase. X-ray, microprobe, and optical evidence suggests that the amorphous films deposited at very low temperatures(i.e., at liquid N2) may subsequently undergo a phase separation upon heating to room temperature and prior to crystallization. Earlier work and present studies of vapordeposited alloys in this system confirm that the observed phases and microstructures can be related to free energy trends estimated from thermodynamic considerations and to specific deposition parameters, such as the substrate temperature and the deposition rates, which influence the kinetics.

Keywords

Differential Scanning Calorimetry Metallurgical Transaction Deposition Rate Amorphous Phase Amorphous Alloy 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    H.F. Rizzo, T.B. Massalski, and E.D. McClanahan:Metall. Trans. A, 1988, vol. 19A, pp. 5–12.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    H.F. Rizzo, L.E. Tanner, M.A. Wall, E.D. McClanahan, and T.B. Massalski: inFundamentals of Beam-Solid Interactions and Transient Thermal Processing, Materials Research Society Proceedings 100, M.J. Aziz, L.E. Rehn, and B. Stritzker, eds., Materials Research Society, Pittsburgh, PA, 1988, pp. 81–85.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    H.F. Rizzo, A. Echeverria, T.B. Massalski, and H. Baxi:Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc, 1989, vol. 128, pp. 231–36.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    M. Nastasi, F.W. Saris, L.S. Hung, and J.W. Mayer:J. Appl. Phys., 1985, vol. 58(8), pp. 3052–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Han Westendorp, Zhong-Lie Wang, and Fran W. Saris:Nucl. Instrum. Methods, 1982, vol. 194, pp. 453–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Z.L. Wang, J.F.M. Westendorp, and F.W. Saris:Nucl. Instrum. Methods, 1983, vol. 209 210, pp. 115–24.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    A. Schafer and G. Menzel:Thin Solid Films, 1978, vol. 52, pp. 11–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    A.G. Dirks and J.J. van der Broek:J. Vac. Sci. Technol. 1985, vol. A3 (6), pp. 2618–22.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    A.R. Miedema and A.K. Niessen:Suppl. to Trans. JIM, 1988, vol. 29, pp. 209–13.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    T. Egami and Y. Waseda:J. Non-Cryst. Solids, 1984, vol. 64, pp. 113–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    P.R. Subramanian and D.E. Laughlin: inPhase Diagrams of Binary Tungsten Alloys, S.V. Nagender Naidu and P. Rama Rao, eds., Indian Institute of Metals, Calcutta, 1991, pp. 76–79.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    A.R. Miedema, P.F. de Chatel, and F.R. de Boer:Physica, 1980, vol. 100B, pp. 1–28.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    T. Egami and S. Aur:J. Non-Cryst. Solids, 1987, vol. 89, pp. 60–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    H.E. Kissinger:Anal. Chem., 1957, vol. 29, 1702–06.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    B. Cantor and R.W. Cahn:Acta Metall., 1976, vol. 24, pp. 845–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    N. Saunders and A.P. Miodownik:J. Mater. Sci., 1987, vol. 22, pp. 629–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    N. Gjostein: inSurfaces and Interfaces I —Chemical and Physical Characteristics J.J. Burke, N.L. Reed, and V. Weiss, eds., Syracuse University Press, Syracuse, NY, 1982, pp. 271–304.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kubaschewski and C.B. Alcock:Metallurgical Thermochemistry, 5th ed., Pergamon Press, 1978, pp. 359–75.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    G. Edrlich and F.G. Hudda:J. Chem. Phys., 1966, vol. 44, pp. 1039–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    G. Veltl, B. Scholtz, and H.-D. Kunze:Mater. Sci. Eng., 1991, vol. A134, pp. 1410–14.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    E. Hellstern, H.J. Fecht, Z. Fu, and W.L. Johnson:J. Appl. Phys., 1989, vol. 65, pp. 305–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    K. Sakurai, Y. Yamada, C.H. Lee, T. Fukunaga, and U. Mizutani:Mater. Sci. Eng. 1989, vol. A134, pp. 1414–17.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    E. Gaffet, C. Louison, M. Hamerlin, and F. Faudot:Mater. Sci. Eng., 1991, vol. A134, pp. 1380–84.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Minerals, Metals and Materials Society, and ASM International 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • H. F. Rizzo
    • 1
  • T. B. Massalski
    • 2
  • M. Nastasi
    • 3
  1. 1.Lawrence Livermore National LaboratoryLivermore
  2. 2.Institut für MetallphysikUniversität GöttingenGermany
  3. 3.Los Alamos National LaboratoryLos Alamos

Personalised recommendations