Advertisement

ZDM

, Volume 38, Issue 2, pp 143–162 | Cite as

A framework for identifying student blockages during transitions in the modelling process

  • Peter Galbraith
  • Gloria Stillman
Analyses

Abstract

In this article we present, illustrate, test and refine a framework developed by Galbraith, Stillman, Brown and Edwards (2006) for identifying student blockages whilst undertaking modelling tasks during transitions in the modelling process. The framework was developed with 14~15 year old students who were engaging in their first experiences of modelling at the secondary level.

ZDM-Classification

C70 M10 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Barab, S., & Squire, K. (2004). Design-based research: Putting a Stake in the ground.The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Blum, W., & Leiß, D. (2006). How do students and teachers deal with mathematical modelling problems? The example “Sugarloaf” and the DISUM project. In C. Haines, P. Galbraith, W. Blum, & S. Khan, (Eds.),Mathematical modelling (ICTMA12): Education, engineering and economics, Chichester, UK: Horwood (to appear).Google Scholar
  3. Charmaz, K. (2005). Grounded theory in the 21st century. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.),The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 507–536). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  4. Edwards, D., & Hamson, M. (1996).Mathematical modelling skills. Basingstoke, UK: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  5. Fishman, B., Marx, R. W., Blumenfeld, P., & Krajcik, J. (2004). Creating a framework for research on systemic technology innovations.The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 43–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Galbraith, P. (2006). Dreaming a possible dream: More windmills to conquer. In C. Haines, P. Galbraith, W. Blum, & S. Khan, (Eds.),Mathematical modelling (ICTMA12): Education, engineering and economics. Chichester, UK: Horwood Press (to appear).Google Scholar
  7. Galbraith, P., Goos, M., Renshaw, P., & Geiger, V. (2003). Technology enriched classrooms: Some implications for teaching applications and modelling. In Qi-Xiao Ye, W. Blum, K. Houston, & Qi-Yuan, Jiang (Eds.),Mathematical modelling in education and culture: ICTMA 10 (pp. 111–125). Chichester, UK: Horwood.Google Scholar
  8. Galbraith, P., Stillman, G., Brown, J., & Edwards, I. (2006). Facilitating middle secondary modelling competencies. In C. Haines, P. Galbraith, W. Blum, & S. Khan, (Eds.),Mathematical modelling (ICTMA12): Education, engineering and economics. Chichester, UK: Horwood Press (to appear).Google Scholar
  9. Gellert, U., Jablonka, E., & Keitel, C. (2001). Mathematical literacy and common sense in mathematics education. In B. Atweh, H. Forgasz, & B. Nebres (Eds.),Sociocultural research on mathematics education: An international perspective. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  10. Gravemeijer, K. (1999). How emergent models may foster the constitution of formal mathematics.Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 1(2), 155–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Julie, C. (2002). Making relevance relevant in mathematics teacher education. In I. Vakalis, D. Hughes Hallett, D. Quinney, & C. Kourouniotis (Compilers).Proceedings of 2nd International Conference on the Teaching of Mathematics: [ICTM-2]. New York: Wiley [CD-ROM].Google Scholar
  12. Pollak, H. (1997). Solving problems in the real world. In L. A. Steen (Ed.),Why numbers count: Quantitative literacy for tomorrow's America. New York: College Entrance Examination Board.Google Scholar
  13. Pollak, H. (2006). Mathematical modelling—A conversation with Henry Pollak. In W. Blum, P. Galbraith, H.-W. Henn, & M. Niss. (Eds.),Modelling and applications in mathematics education, New ICMI Studies Series no. 10, New York: Springer (to appear).Google Scholar
  14. QSR (1997). Non-numerical Unstructured Data*Indexing Searching and Theorizing (NUD*IST) v.4 [Computer Software]. Melbourne, Australia: QSR.Google Scholar
  15. Stillman, G. (1998). The emperor's new clothes? Teaching and assessment of mathematical applications at the senior secondary level. In P. Galbraith, W. Blum, G. Booker, & I. D. Huntley (Eds.),Mathematical modelling: Teaching and assessment in a technology-rich world (pp. 243–264), Chichester, UK: Horwood.Google Scholar
  16. Stillman, G. (2002). Students' models, methods, limitations and assumptions for an applications task in a CAS calculator environment. In M. Goos & T. Spencer (Eds.),Mathematics ≈ making waves (pp. 226–233). Adelaide, Australia: Australian Association of Mathematics Teachers.Google Scholar
  17. Stillman, G. (2006). The role of challenge in engaging lower secondary students in investigating real world tasks. In E. Barbeau & P. Taylor (Eds.),Proceedings of the ICMI Study 16: Mathematical Challenges, Trondheim, Norway, Pre-Conference Vol. (to appear).Google Scholar
  18. Victorian Curriculum and Assessment Authority (VCAA). (2005).Victorian essential learning Standards: Discipline-based learning Mathematics. Melbourne, Australia: Author.Google Scholar
  19. Zbiek, R., & Conner, A. (2006). Beyond motivation: Exploring mathematical modeling as a context for deepening students' understanding of curricular mathematics.Educational Studies in Mathematics (to appear)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© ZDM 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Peter Galbraith
    • 1
  • Gloria Stillman
    • 2
  1. 1.Faculty of EducationThe University of QueenslandSt LuciaAustralia
  2. 2.Science and Mathematics Education Faculty of EducationThe University of MelbourneParkvilleAustralia

Personalised recommendations