The influence of grain orientation on the mode and rate of fatigue crack growth inα-titanium
- 248 Downloads
- 36 Citations
Abstract
The high cycle fatigue crack growth characteristics of coarse grainedα-titanium have been studied in vacuum, air, water and brine. Tests were carried out on single-edge-notch tension test-pieces at anR ratio of 0.35, a frequency of 130 Hz, and a ΔK range of 5 to 25 MPa-√m. The use of channelling patterns in the SEM permitted detailed crystallographic information to be correlated with fatigue fracture morphologies. Three distinct modes of fatigue crack growth were identified. Cleavage-like facets on the basal planes (0002); the formation of which was encouraged by increasing severity of environment and increasing stress normal to (0002), striations on planes normal to (0002) consistent with a mechanism involving intersecting prism slip systems, and furrows in the [0001] direction associated with fine lines parallel to the 1123 direction. It is shown how the relationships between grain orientation, stress geometry and testing environment may be presented in the form of Grain Orientation Control Maps. The rate of fatigue crack growth in individual grains was dominated by the mode of growth; below a ΔK of 10 MPa√m the cleavage-like mode was up to 10 times more rapid than the other modes of growth.
Keywords
Fatigue Metallurgical Transaction Crack Growth Rate Fatigue Crack Growth Crack FrontPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- 1.J. L. Robinson and C. J. Beevers:Met. Sci. J., 1973, vol. 7, p. 15–3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 2.P. E. Irving and C. J. Beevers:Met. Trans., 1974, vol. 5, p. 391.Google Scholar
- 3.D. F. Neal and P. A. Blenkinsop:Acta Met., 1976, vol. 24, p. 59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.D. A. Meyn:Met. Trans., 1971, vol. 2, p. 853.Google Scholar
- 5.R. J. H. Wanhill:Met. Trans. A, 1976, vol. 7A, p. 1365.Google Scholar
- 6.R. J. Bucci, P. C. Paris, R. W. Hertzberg, R. A. Schmidt, and A. F. Anderson: ASTM STP 513, p. 125, ASTM, Philadelphia, Pa, 1972.Google Scholar
- 7.R. J. H. Wanhill:Br. Corros. J., 1973, vol. 8, p. 216.Google Scholar
- 8.D. A. Meyn and G. Sandoz:Trans. TMS-AIME, 1969, vol. 245 p. 1253.Google Scholar
- 9.D. Hoeppner:Metallography, 1978, vol. 11, p. 129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.J. C. Chesnutt and J. C. Williams:Met. Trans. A., 1977, vol. 8A, p. 515.Google Scholar
- 11.A. W. Bowen:Acta Met. 1975, vol. 23, p. 1401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.D. M. Gilbey and S. Pearson: Technical Report 66402, Royal Aircraft Establishment, Farnborough, Hants, U.K., 1966.Google Scholar
- 13.D. G. Coates:Phil. Mag., 1967, vol. 16, p. 1179.Google Scholar
- 14.C. G. van Essen, E. M. Schulson, and R. H. Donaghay:J. Mater. Sa., 1971, vol. 6, p. 213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.A. Kelly, W. R. Tyson and A. H. Cottrell:Phil Mag., 1967, vol. 15, p. 567.Google Scholar
- 16.R. Ayres and D. F. Stein:Acta Met., 1971, vol. 19, p. 789.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.T. Tanaka and H. Conrad:Acta Met., 1971, vol. 19, p. 1001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 18.G. F. Pittinato:Met. Trans., 1972, vol. 3, p. 235.Google Scholar
- 19.G. F. Pittinato:Trans. ASM, 1969, vol. 62, p. 410.Google Scholar
- 20.G. F. Pittinato and S. F. Frederick:Met. Trans., 1970, vol. 1 p. 3241.Google Scholar
- 21.R. M. N. Pelloux:Eng. Fract. Mech., 1970, vol. 1, p. 697.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 22.C. Laird: ASTM STP 415, p. 505, ASTM Philadelphia, Pa 1967.Google Scholar
- 23.R. J. H. Wanhill and H. Doker: National Aerospace Laboratory NLR Report MP 75006U, 1975.Google Scholar