Advertisement

77 to 1200 K tensile properties of several wrought superalloys after long-term 1093 K heat treatment in air and vacuum

  • J. D. Whittenberger
Testing and Evaluation

Abstract

The 77 to 1200 K tensile properties of approximately 1.3 mm thick wrought sheet Co-base Haynes alloy 188 and Ni-base Haynes alloy 230 and Inconel 617 have been measured after heat treatment in air and vacuum for periods up to 22,500 h at 1093 K. Significant changes in structure were produced by prior exposures, including precipitation of second phases and, in the case of heat treatment in air, oxide scale and surface-connected grain boundary pits/oxides, as deep as 50 to 70 µm, in all three superalloys. Due to the geometry of the experiment, the vacuum-exposed samples were protected from loss of volatile elements by evaporation; hence, such specimens were simply given 1093 K anneals in an innocuous environment, which produced very little surface attack. Compared to the properties of as-received alloys, prior exposure tended to reduce both the yield strength and ultimate tensile strength, with the greatest reductions at 77 and 298 K. The most dramatic effect of heat treatment was found in the low-temperature residual tensile elongation, where decreases from 40 to 5% at 77 K were found. Ductility is the only property that was found to have a consistent dependency on environment, with air exposure always yielding less tensile elongation than vacuum exposure.

Keywords

cobalt based alloys heat treatment nickel based alloys tensile properties vacuum superalloys 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    T.L. Labus, R.R. Secunde, and R.G. Lovely, Solar Dynamic Power Module Design, Paper No. 899277,IECEC89, Vol 1, IEEE, 1989, p 299–307Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    J.D. Whittenberger,.J. Mater. Eng., Vol 12, 1990, p 211–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    J.D. Whittenberger,J. Mater. Eng. Perform., Vol 1, 1992, p 469–482CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    H.J. Strumpf, R.P. Rubley, and M.G. Coombs, Material Compatibility and Simulation Testing for the Brayton Engine Solar Receiver for the NASA Space Station Freedom Solar Dynamic Option, Paper No. 899076,IECEC, Vol 2, IEEE, 1989, p 895–903Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    D.T. Bourgette and H.E. McCoy,Trans ASM, Vol 59,1966, p 324–339Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    J.D. Whittenberger,J. Mater. Eng. Perform., Vol 2, 1993, p 745–757CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    J.D. Cotton and L.M. Sedgwick, Compatibility of Selected Superalloys with Molten LiF-CaF2 Salt, Paper No. 899235,IECEC89, Vol 2, IEEE, 1989, p 917–921Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    J.D. Whittenberger,J. Mater. Energy Sys., Vol 8, 1987, p 385–390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    J.D. Whittenberger,J. Mater. Eng., Vol 10, 1988, p 247–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© ASM International 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. D. Whittenberger
    • 1
  1. 1.NASA Lewis Research CenterCleveland

Personalised recommendations