Advertisement

Metallurgical Transactions A

, Volume 20, Issue 3, pp 383–389 | Cite as

The electrical conductivity of cast Al−Si alloys in the range 2 to 12.6 wt pct silicon

  • M. H. Mulazimoglu
  • R. A. L. Drew
  • J. E. Gruzleski
Transformations

Abstract

The changes in electrical conductivity of cast Al−Si alloys, in the range of 2 to 12.6 wt pct silicon due to strontium additions (0.03 wt pct) have been investigated and explained in terms of variations in microstructure. The strontium-containing alloys exhibited a higher conductivity than alloys with no strontium, and this conductivity difference increased as the silicon and magnesium contents were increased and the solidification rate was decreased. It has been demonstrated that this difference is due to changes in microstructural features of the eutectic silicon upon modification.

Keywords

Metallurgical Transaction Eutectic Silicon Silicon Phase Modify Alloy Unmodified Alloy 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    S. Jacob and A. Remy:Fonderie, 1983, vol. 22, pp. 33–41.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    H. Oger, B. Closset, and J.E. Gruzleski:Trans. Amer. Foundrymen's Society, 1983, vol. 91, pp. 17–20Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    B. Closset, K. Pirie, and J. E. Gruzleski:Trans. Amer. Foundrymen's Society, 1984, vol. 92, pp. 123–33.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    B. Closset, R.A.L. Drew, J.E. Gruzleski, and K. Pirie:Mém. Sci. Rev. Métall., 1985, pp. 167–79.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    M.H. Mulazimoglu, R.A.L. Drew, and J.E. Gruzleski:Metall. Trans. A 1987, vol. 18A, pp. 941–47.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    S.A. Argyropoulos, B. Closset, and J.E. Gruzleski;Trans. Amer. Foundrymen's Society, 1983, vol. 91, pp. 515–22.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    ASTM Standard, Non-Destructive Testing, E1004-84, 1986, vol. 03.03, pp. 854–58.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    J.L. Murray and A.J. McAlister:Bull. Alloy Phase Diagrams, 1984, vol. 5, pp. 74–84Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    G.S. Brady and H.R. Clauser:Materials Handbook, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, 1986 p. 722.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    D. Argo, R.A.L. Drew, and J.E. Gruzleski:Trans. Amer. Foundrymen's Society, 1987, vol. 95, pp. 455–64.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    D.K. Hale:J. Mater. Science, 1976, vol. 2, pp. 2105–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    M.H. Mulazimoglu: Ph.D. Thesis, McGill University, 1988, ch. 4, pp. 100–06.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    A. Hellawell;Prog. Mater. Science, 1973, vol. 15, pp. 1–76.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    P.B. Crossley and L.F. Mondolfo:Modern Castings, 1966, vol. 49, pp. 53–64.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    M.D. Hanna, S.Z. Lu, and A. Hellawell,Metall. Trans. A 1984, vol. 15A, pp. 459–69.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    K.F. Kobayashi and L.M. Hogan:J. Mater. Science, 1985, vol. 20, pp. 1961–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    S.C. Flood and J.D. Hunt;Metal Science, 1981, vol. 15, pp. 287–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    R. Elliot:Eutectic Solidification Processing Butterworth's, London, 1983, pp. 162–79.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society and ASM International 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. H. Mulazimoglu
    • 1
  • R. A. L. Drew
    • 1
  • J. E. Gruzleski
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Mining and Metallurgical EngineeringMcGill UniversityMontrealCanada

Personalised recommendations