Metallurgical and Materials Transactions B

, Volume 26, Issue 3, pp 509–515

Thermoanalysis of the combined Fe3O4-reduction and CH4-reforming processes

  • A. Steinfeld
  • A. Frei
  • P. Kuhn


The chemical equilibrium composition of the system Fe3O4 + 4CH4, at 1300 K and 1 atm consists of solid Fe and a 2:1 gas mixture of H2 and CO. Thermogravimetric (TG) analysis combined with gas Chromatographic measurements was conducted on the reduction of Fe3O4 (powder, 2-µm mean particle size) with 2.3, 5, 10, and 20 pct CH4 in Ar, at 1273, 1373, 1473, and 1573 K. The reduction proceeded in two stages, from Fe3O4 to FeO, and finally to Fe. CR, conversion and H2 yield increased with temperature, while the overall reaction rate increased with temperature and CH4 concentration. C (gr) deposition, due to the cracking of CR,, was observed. By applying a topochemical model for spherical particles of unchanging size, the reaction mechanism was found to be mostly controlled by gas boundary layer diffusion. The apparent activation energy reached a maximum at 30 pct reduction extent and decreased monotonically until completion. When compared with the results using instead either H2 or CO as reducing gas, the reduction achieved completion faster using CH4, at temperatures above 1373 K.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    A. Steinfeld, P. Kuhn, and J. Karni:Energy, 1993, vol. 18, pp. 239–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    C.G. Davis, J.F. McFarlin, and H.R. Pratt:Ironmaking and Steelmaking, 1982, vol. 9, pp. 93–129.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    S.S. Penner:Energy, 1987, vol. 12 (special issue), p. 629.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    D. Barret:Ind. Eng. Chem. Process Des. Dey., 1972, vol. 11, pp. 415–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    D. Ghosh, A.K. Roy, and A. Ghosh:Trans. Iron Steel Inst. Jpn., 1986, vol. 26, pp. 186–93.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    L.A. Haas, J.C. Nigro, and R.K. Zahl: U.S. Bureau of Mines Report RI-8997, U.S. Department of Interior, Twin Cities Research Center, Minneapolis, MN, 1985.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    P. Ruprecht and M. Baerns:Chem.-Ing.-Tech., 1971, vol. 43, pp. 894–902.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    K.M. Hutchings, R.J. Hawkins, and J.D. Smith:Ironmaking and Steelmaking, 1988, vol. 15, pp. 121–26.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    JANAF Thermochemical Tables, 3rd ed., National Bureau of Standards, Washington, DC, 1985.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    S. Gordon and J.B. McBride: NASA SP-273, NASA Lewis Research, Cleveland, OH, 1976. A PC version devised by T. Kappauf, M. Pipho, and E. Whitby for E.A. Fletcher at the University of Minnesota was used in this study.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    W.H. Dennis:Metallurgy of Ferrous Metals, Pitman Publishing Corp., London, 1963.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    L.B. Pankratz, J.M. Stuve, and N.A. Gokcen:Thermodynamic Data for Mineral Technology, U.S. Department of Interior, Bureau of Mines, Pittsburgh, PA, 1984.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    N. Towhidi and J. Szekely:Metall. Trans. B, 1983, vol. 14B, pp. 359–67.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    H.U. Ross, D. McAdams, and T. Marshall:Direct Reduced Iron-Technology and Economics of Production and Use, ISS-AIME, Warrendale, PA, 1980, pp. 27–34.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    O. Levenspiel:Chemical Reaction Engineering, 2nd ed., John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, NY, 1972, pp. 357–408.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    A. Steinfeld and E.A. Fletcher:Energy, 1991, vol. 16, pp. 1011–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    A. Steinfeld and G. Thompson:Energy, 1994, vol. 19, pp. 1077–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    J. Gretz, W. Korf, and R. Lyons:Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 1991, vol. 16, pp. 691–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Minerals, Metals & Material Society 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. Steinfeld
    • 1
  • A. Frei
    • 1
  • P. Kuhn
    • 1
  1. 1.Laboratory for Energy and Process TechnologyPaul Scherrer InstituteVilligen-PSISwitzerland

Personalised recommendations