Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A

, Volume 25, Issue 5, pp 961–968 | Cite as

Fracture of glass in tensile and bending tests

  • Orestes E. Alarcón
  • Ricardo E. medrano
  • Pcter P. Gillis
Mechanical Behavior


To fully characterize the mechanical behavior of ceramics, it is useful to study their response to both tensile and bending tests. In this investigation, a quantitative comparison is made between tensile and bending results from (circularly) cylindrical glass rods of borosilicate glass and of fused silica. These experimental results show that in each material, the Weibull exponentm is approximately the same for both types of test. The fractured samples clearly showed that all failures initiated at surface-located flaws. The stress level at which the probability of fracture in tension equals 50 Pct was determined; the maximum tensile stress for 50 Pct probability of fracture in bending was also determined. The ratio of these two stresses was predicted previously from simple, theoretical considerations based upon the applicability of the Weibull function and on the distribution of defects in the specimens. This theoretical result is inconsistent with the experimental observations in view of the fractography. Therefore, it is concluded that failure in the materials tested is not satisfactorily described by Weibull statistics.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    S.W. Freiman: inGlass Science and Technology, D. Uhlman and N.J. Kreidl, eds., Academic Press, New York, NY, 1980, vol. 5, pp. 21–78.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    C.W. Marshall and A. Rudnick: inFracture Mechanics of Ceramics, R.C. Brandt, D.P.H. Hasselman, and F.F. Lange, eds., Plenun Press, New York, NY, 1974, vol. 1, pp. 69–92.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    R.E. Medrano and J.M.L. Costa: inProc. VII Interamerican Conf. on Materials Technology, Southwest Research Institute, San Antonio, TX, 1981, pp. 711–15.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    R.J. Charles:J. Appl. Phys., 1958, vol. 29, pp. 1657–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    M.A.R. Lucas, R.E. Medrano, and P.P. Gillis:Metall. Trans. A, 1991, vol. 22A, pp. 887–71.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    J.E. Ritter and C.C. Sherburne:J. Am. Ceram. Soc, 1971, vol. 54, pp. 601–05.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    H. Furutomi:Optical Fiber Cable, The Telecommunication Association, Tokyo, Japan, 1986.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    P.W. France and W.J. Duncan: inPhysics of Fiber Optics, Advances in Ceramics, B. Bendow and S.S. Mitra, eds., American Ceramic Society, Columbus, OH, 1981, vol. 2, pp. 149–57.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    W. Weibull:J. Appl. Mech., 1951, vol. 18, pp. 293–97.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    K.C. Kapur and L.R. Lamberson:Reliability in Engineering Design, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, 1977, pp. 291–338.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    S. Timoshenko:Strength of Materials, D. Van Nostrand Co., New York, NY, 1956.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    J.A. Kies: NRL Report No. 5093, Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, DC, 1958.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    R.E. Medrano and P.P. Gillis:J. Am. Ceram. Soc, 1987, vol. 70, pp. C230-C232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    J.J. Mecholsky, S.W. Freiman, and R.W. Rice: Special Technical Publication No. 645, pp. 363–79, ASTM, Philadelphia, PA, 1978.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    J.W. Johnson and D.G. Holloway:Phil. Mag., 1966, vol. 14, pp. 731–43.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    J. Mecholsky, S.W. Frieman, and S.M. Morey:Fiber Optics, Advances in Research and Development, B. Bendow and S.S. Mitra, eds., Plenum Press, New York, NY, 1979, pp. 187–208.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Minerals, Metals and Materials Society, and ASM International 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Orestes E. Alarcón
    • 1
  • Ricardo E. medrano
    • 2
  • Pcter P. Gillis
    • 3
  1. 1.LABMAT, Univ.Fed. S. CatarinaFlorianópolis, SCBrazil
  2. 2.Faculdade de Engenharia MecânicaUNICAMPCampinasBrazil
  3. 3.Department of Materials Science and EngineeringUniversity of KentuckyLexington

Personalised recommendations