Effect of grain refinement on the fluidity of two commercial Al-Si foundry alloys
- 480 Downloads
- 52 Citations
Abstract
The effect of grain refinement on the fluidity of AlSi7Mg and AlSi11Mg has been investigated by spiral tests. Two different types of grain refiners have been evaluated. An AlTi5Bl master alloy was added to different Ti contents. Since the commercial alloys had a high initial content of titanium, model alloys were made to investigate the fluidity at low grain refiner additions. Commercial alloys grain refined only by boron additions have also been investigated. The results from the fluidity measurements have been verified by measuring the dendrite coherency point of the different cast alloys. Although different, the two methods show similar trends. The spirals from each fraction grain refiner cast were subsequently investigated metallographically at the tip of the spirals and at a reference point a distance behind, but no obvious difference in structure was observed. For both alloys, an increase in fluidity is observed as the content of grain refiner increases above 0.12 pct Ti, while the fluidity is impaired with increased grain refinement below 0.12 pct Ti. The alloys grain refined with ~0.015 pct B show the highest fraction solid at dendrite coherency, the smallest grain size, and the best fluidity.
Keywords
Material Transaction Riser Master Alloy Model Alloy Average Running LengthPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- 1.G. Chai, T. Rølland, L. Arnberg, and L. Bäckerud:Processing of Semi-Solid Alloys and Composites, S.B. Brown and M.C. Flemings, eds., Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, 1992, pp. 193–201.Google Scholar
- 2.L. Arnberg, G. Chai, and L. Bäckerud:Mater. Sci. Eng., vol. A173, 1993, pp. 101–03.Google Scholar
- 3.G. Chai: Ph.D. Thesis, Stockholm University, Stockholm,Chem. Comm., 1994, No. 1.Google Scholar
- 4.A.K. Dahle and L. Arnberg:4th Int. Conf. on Aluminum Alloys, T.H. Sanders, Jr. and E.A. Starke, Jr., eds., Atlanta, GA, 1994, pp. 91–98.Google Scholar
- 5.A.K. Dahle and L. Arnberg: SINTEF Report No. STF34 A93248, Trondheim, Norway, 1993.Google Scholar
- 6.G. Chai, L. Bäckerud, and L. Arnberg:Z. Metallkd., 1995, vol. 86, pp. 54–59.Google Scholar
- 7.C.R. Loper, Jr.:AFS Trans., 1992, vol. 100, pp. 533–38.Google Scholar
- 8.C.R. Loper, Jr. and T.E. Prucha:AFS Trans., 1990, vol. 98, pp. 845–53.Google Scholar
- 9.G. Lang:Aluminium, 1972, vol. 48 (10), pp. 664–72.Google Scholar
- 10.F.R. Mollard, M.C. Flemings, and E.F. Niyama:J. Met., 1987, Nov., pp. 34–37.Google Scholar
- 11.M.C. Flemings, E. Niyama, and H.F. Taylor:AFS Trans., 1961, vol. 69, pp. 625–35.Google Scholar
- 12.B.C. Pai and H. Jones:Solidification Processing 1987, The Institute of Metals, London, 1988, pp. 319–22.Google Scholar
- 13.P. Bastien, J.C. Armbruster, and P. Azou:AFS Trans., 1962, vol. 70, pp. 400–09.Google Scholar
- 14.F.L. Arnold, J.L. Jorstad, and G.E. Stein:Curr. Eng. Pract., 1963, July, pp. 10–15.Google Scholar
- 15.J. Campbell:Castings, Butterworth-Heinemann Ltd., Oxford, United Kingdom, 1991.Google Scholar
- 16.M.C. Flemings:Solidification Processing, Mc-Graw Hill Book Co., New York, NY, 1974.Google Scholar
- 17.P.A. Tondel: Ph.D. Thesis, Norwegian Institute of Technology, Trondheim, Norway, 1994.Google Scholar
- 18.W.H.M. Alsem, P.C. van Wiggen, and M. Vader: inLight Metals 1992, E.R. Cutshall, ed., TMS, Warrendale, PA, 1991, pp. 821–29.Google Scholar
- 19.A. Kolsgaard: Ph.D. Thesis, Norwegian Institute of Technology, Trondheim, Norway, 1993.Google Scholar
- 20.J. Tamminen: Ph.D. Thesis, Stockholm University, Stockholm,Chem. Comm., 1988, No. 2.Google Scholar
- 21.Registration Record of Aluminum Association Alloy Designations and Chemical Composition Limits for Aluminum Alloys in the Form of Castings and Ingot, The Aluminum Association, La Jolla, CA, July 1985.Google Scholar
- 22.P. Hoefs, W. Reif, and W. Schneider:Giesserei, 1994, vol. 84 (12), pp. 398–406.Google Scholar