Advertisement

Acta Seismologica Sinica

, Volume 9, Issue 3, pp 377–387 | Cite as

Microearthquake analysis for hydraulic fracturing process

  • Ying-Ping Li
Article

Abstract

The hydraulic fracture technique is widely applied in the enhancement of petroleum and natural gas productions and in the development of geothermal energy. This technique is also used to create an underground fracture zone system for disposal of solid and liquid wastes. This is the most recent development in the application of industrial techniques to environmental protection scientific problems. Knowledge of mechanical properties and geometrical parameters of a hydraulic fracture zone is important for both energy resource development and safe disposal of waste. Hydraulic fracturing often induces many microearthquakes. Analysis of the spatial-temporal distribution of the induced seismicity yields the geometry of a hydraulic fracture zone, and kinetic and dynamic parameters associated with the fracture growth process. Applying a waveform correlation analysis and a space-time grid search method, we precisely determined hypocentral locations for 157 microearthquakes induced by hydraulic fracturing. Spatial distribution of the induced seismicity clearly shows the dimension and orientation of a hydraulic fracture zone. Variation of the seismicity distribution in time and space was used to infer the growth rate and direction of the fracture zone. An empirical Green’s function (EGF) method was applied to earthquake doublets to retrieve relative source time functions (RSTF’s) and to estimate source parameters, such as seismic moment, source radius, and stress drop, for larger microearthquakes. Azimuthal variation of the RSTF of a master event indicates that the source ruptured to the northwest, which aggrees with the fracture zone growth direction. Large variation of stress drops for these induced earthquakes reflects the significant heterogeneity of mechanical properties in the hydraulic fracture zone.

Key words

hydraulic fracture zone waveform correlation earthquake location fracture dimension and growth rate empirical Green’s function source parameters 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Block, L. V., 1990. Joint hypocentral-velocity inversion of local earthquake arrival time data in geothermal regions,Ph. D Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. 1–448.Google Scholar
  2. Block, L. V., Cheng, C. H., and Fehler M. C.,et al., 1994. Seismic imaging using microearthquakes induced by hydraulic fracturing.Geophysics,59: 102–112.Google Scholar
  3. Boatwright, J. A., 1980. A sepctral theory for circular seismic sources: simple estimates of source dimension, dynamic stress drop and radiation energy.Bull. Seism. Soc. Am.,70: 1–28.Google Scholar
  4. Brune, J. N., 1970. Tectonic stress and the spectra of seismic shear wave from earthquakes.J. Geophys. Res.,75: 4997–5009.Google Scholar
  5. Chen, Y. T., Zhou, J. Y., and Ni, H. C., 1990. Inversion of near-source broadband accelerograms for the earthquake source-time function.Tectonophysics,197: 89–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Fehler, M., House, L., and Kaieda, H., 1987. Determining planes along which earthquakes occur: method and application to earthquakes accompanying hydraulic fracturing.J. Geophys. Res.,92: 9407–9414.Google Scholar
  7. Fehler, M. and Phillips, W. S., 1991. Simultaneous inversion forQ and source parameters of microearthquakes accompanying hydraulic fracturing in granitic rock.Bull. Seism. Soc. Am.,81: 553–573.Google Scholar
  8. Frankel, A., Fletcher, J. and Vernon, F.,et al., 1986. Rupture characteristics and tomographic source imaging ofM L-3 earthquakes near Anza, south California.J. Geophys. Res.,91: 12633–12650.Google Scholar
  9. Fukao, Y. and Kikuchi, M., 1987. Source retrieval for mantle earthquakes by iterative deconvolution of long-period P-waves.Techtonophysics,144, 249–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Geller, R. J., and Mueller, C. S., 1980. Four similar earthquakes in central California.Geophys. Res. Lett.,7: 821–824.Google Scholar
  11. Hartzell, S., 1978. Earthquake aftershocks as Green’s functions.Geophys. Res. Lett.,5: 1–4.Google Scholar
  12. House, L., 1987. Locating microearthquakes induced by hydraulic fracturing in crystalline rock.Geophys. Res. Lett.,14: 919–921.Google Scholar
  13. Li, Y. and Thurber, C. H., 1988. Source properties of two microearthquakes in Kilauea volcano, Hawaii.Bull. Seism. Soc. Am.,78: 1123–1132.Google Scholar
  14. Li Y., 1995. Study of hydraulic fracturing process: Applications in resource development and environment protection.Proceedings of the Second Academic Conference of Young Scientist (CAST) in Beijing, China, July 24–26, Resource and Environmental Science Volume (Chinese Science and Technology Publisher), 100–108.Google Scholar
  15. Li, Y., Doll, C., and Toksöz, M. N., 1995. Source characterization and fault plane determination forM bL g=1.2 to 4.4 earthquakes in the Charleviox seismic zone, Quebec, Canada.Bull. Seism. Soc. Am.,85: 1604–1621.Google Scholar
  16. Mori, J., 1993. Fault plane determinations for three small earthquakes along the San Jacinto fault California: Search for cross faults.J. Geophys. Res.,98: 17711–17722.Google Scholar
  17. Moriya, H., Nagano, K., and Niitsuma, H., 1993. Precise source location of AE doublets by spectral matrix analysis of triaxial hodogram.Geophysics,59: 36–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mueller, C., 1985. Source pulse enhancement by decovolution of an empirical Green’s function.Geophys. Res. Lett.,12: 33–36.Google Scholar
  19. Pearson, C., 1982. Parameters and a magnitude moment relationship from small earthquakes observed during hydraulic fracturing experiments in crystalline rocks.Geophys. Res. Lett.,9: 404–407.Google Scholar
  20. Pechmann, J. C. and Kanamori, H., 1982. Waveform and spectra of preshocks and aftershocks of the 1979 Imperial Valley, California, earthquakes: Evidence of fault heterogeneity?J. Geophys. Res.,87: 10579–10597.Google Scholar
  21. Phillips, W. S., House, L. S., and Fehler, M. C., 1992.V P/V S and the structure of microearthquake clusters.Seismol. Res. Lett.,63: 56–57.Google Scholar
  22. Poupinet, G., Ellsworth, W. L., and Frechet, J., 1984. Monitoring velocity variations in the crust using earthquake doublets: an application to the Calaversa fault, California.J. Geophys. Res.,89: 5719–5731.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Truby, L. S., Keck, R. G., and Withers, R. J., 1994. Data gethering for a comprehensive field fracturing diagnostic project: A case study: SPE/IADC Paper 27516, Presented at the SPE/IADC Drilling Conference, Dallas, Texas, Feberary 18–20.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Acta Seismologica Sinica 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ying-Ping Li
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary SciencesMassachusetts Institute of TechnologyCambridgeUSA

Personalised recommendations