The normalized coffin- manson plot in terms of a new damage function based on grain boundary cavitation under creep- fatigue condition
- 221 Downloads
- 26 Citations
Abstract
A new damage function based on a model for the creep-fatigue life prediction in terms of nucleation and growth of grain boundary cavities is proposed. This damage function is a combination of the terms related to the cavitational damage in the life prediction equation and is generally applicable to the materials in which failure is controlled by the grain boundary cavitational damage. The creep-fatigue data from the present and other investigations are used to check the validity of the proposed function, and it is shown that they satisfy the reliability of damage function. Additionally, using this damage function, one may realize that all the Coffin-Manson plots at the various levels of tensile hold time and temperature under strain-controlled creep-fatigue tests can be normalized to make the master curve.
Keywords
Material Transaction Hold Time Damage Function Korea Advance Institute Plastic Strain RangeReferences
- 1.E.G. Ellison and A.J.F. Patterson:Proc. Inst. Meek Eng., 1976, vol. 190, pp. 321–50.Google Scholar
- 2.C.R. Brinkman, G.E. Korth, and R.R. Hobbins:Nucl. Technol, 1972, vol. 16, pp. 297–307.Google Scholar
- 3.J. Wareing:Metall. Trans. A, 1977, vol. 8A, pp. 711–21.Google Scholar
- 4.J.W. Hong, S.W. Nam, and K.-T. Rie:J. Mater. Sci., 1985, vol. 20, pp. 3763–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.J.B. Conway and J.T. Beding:Metall. Trans., 1970, vol. 1, pp. 324- 25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.J.B. Conway, J.T. Berling, and R.H. Stentz:Metall. Trans., 1971, vol. 2, pp. 3247–48.Google Scholar
- 7.Y.C. Yoon and S.W. Nam:J. Mater. Sci., 1995, in press.Google Scholar
- 8.B.G. Choi: Master's Thesis, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Taejon, Korea, 1994.Google Scholar
- 9.R. Raj and M.F. Ashby:Acta Metall., 1975, vol. 23, pp. 653–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.L.F. Cffin, Jr.:Trans. ASME, 1954, vol. 76, pp. 931–50.Google Scholar
- 11.S.S. Manson: NASA Technical Note 2933, NASA Research Center, Cleveland, OH, 1954.Google Scholar
- 12.D. Hull and D.E. Rimmer:Phil. Mag., 1959, vol. 4, pp. 673–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.L.F. Coffin and J.R. Tavernelli:Trans. Am. Inst. Mining Metall. Petroleum Eng., 1959, vol. 215 (5), p. 794.Google Scholar
- 14.Y.J. Oh and S.W. Nam:J. Mater. Sci., 1992, vol. 27, pp. 2019–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.W.J. Ostergren:Proc. ASME-MPC Symp. on Creep-Fatigue Interaction, ASME, New York, NY, 1976, pp. 179–202.Google Scholar
- 16.A.M. Ermi and J. Moteff:Metall. Trans. A, 1982, vol. 13A, pp. 1577- 88.Google Scholar
- 17.C.E. Jaske, H. Mindlin, and J.S. Perrin:Trans. ASME, 1972, Aug., pp. 930–34.Google Scholar
- 18.R.A. Perkins, R.A. Pdgett, Jr., and N.K. Tunali:Metall. Trans., 1973, vol. 4, pp. 2535–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 19.Y.C. Yoon and S.W. Nam:J. Mater. Sci. Lett., 1994, vol. 13, pp. 1270–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 20.S. Majumdar and P.S. Maiya:J. Eng. Mater. Technol. ASME, 1980, vol. 102 (1), pp. 159–67.Google Scholar
- 21.P.S. Maiya and S. Majumdar:Metall. Trans. A, 1977, vol. 8A, pp. 1651–60.Google Scholar
- 22.C.Y. Cheng and D.R. Diercks:Metall. Trans. A, 1973, vol. 4A, pp. 615–17.Google Scholar
- 23.R.D. Campbell:J. Eng. Industry ASME, 1971, vol. 93 (4), pp. 887–92.Google Scholar
- 24.P.S. Maiya:Mater. Sci. Eng., 1981, vol. 47, pp. 13–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 25.A.M. Ermi and J. Moteff:J. Eng. Mater. Technol. ASME, 1983, vol. 105 (1), pp. 21–30.Google Scholar
- 26.V.M. Radhkrishnan:J. Eng. Mater. Technol. ASME, 1983, vol. 105 (4), pp. 273–79.Google Scholar
- 27.C.R. Brinkman and G.E. Korth:Metall. Trans., 1974, vol. 5, pp. 792- 94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 28.R. Hales:Fatigue Eng. Mater. Struct., 1980, vol. 3, pp. 339–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 29.D.S. Wood, J. Wynn, A.B. Baldwin, and P. O'riordan:Fatigue Eng. Mater. Struct., 1980, vol. 3, pp. 39–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 30.M. Sakane and M. OhnamiJ. Eng. Mater. Technol. ASME, 1980, vol. 105 (2), pp. 75–80.Google Scholar
- 31.K.T. Rie, E. Lachman, and J. Ruge:Advances in Fracture Research, Proc. 5th Int. Conf. on Fracture, D. Francois, ed., Cannes, France, 1981, pp. 2371-78.Google Scholar
- 32.S.W. Nam, J.W. Hong, and K.-T. Rie:Metall. Trans. A, 1988, vol. 19A, pp. 121–27.Google Scholar
- 33.B.O. Kong, S.C. Lee, and S.W. Nam:J. Korean Inst. Met, 1991, vol. 29 (5), pp. 514–19.Google Scholar
- 34.C.R. Brinkman, M.K. Strizak, N.K. Booker, and C.E. Jaske:J. Nucl. Mater., 1976, vol. 62, pp. 181–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 35.W.J. Elder, J.B. Marriott, and M.C. Murphy:Fatigue at Elevated Temperature, ASTM STP 520, ASTM, Philadelphia, PA, 1973, pp. 320–31.Google Scholar
- 36.K.D. Challenger and P.G. Vining:J. Eng. Mater. Technol. ASME, 1983, vol. 105, pp. 280–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 37.H. Teranishi and A.J. McEvily:Metall. Trans. A, 1979, vol. 10A, pp. 1806–08.Google Scholar
- 38.K.D. Challenger, A.K. Miller, and C.R. Brinkman:J. Eng. Mater. Technol. ASME, 1981, vol. 103, pp. 7–14.Google Scholar
- 39.T. Endo and T. Sakon:Met. Technol, 1984, vol. 11, pp. 489–96.Google Scholar
- 40.J.H. Ryu: Ph.D. Thesis, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Taejon, Korea, 1989.Google Scholar
- 41.D.C. Lord, L.F. Cffin and Jr.:Metall. Trans., 1973, vol. 4, pp. 1647- 51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar