Modeling of metal-slag equilibrium processes using neural nets
- 91 Downloads
- 13 Citations
Abstract
Although numerous methods have been proposed in the literature for the modeling of slag/metal equilibrium processes, these models are usually semiempirical hybrids of regression equations and thermodynamic equilibria. Fundamental models are successful only in a few cases, owing to the complexity of interaction between variables in real pyrometallurgical systems. This article shows that neural networks are suitable for modeling such ill-defined equilibrium processes, with noa priori knowledge being required about the form of any model. A three-layered perceptron or backpropagation network is used in this article. A weight matrix describes the relative strength of the interconnections between the network nodes and therefore the relative importance of variables. A number of sets of experimental data could be used to train the neural net which can then be used to predict other sets of data. Neural nets have been used successfully for the modeling of activities in metals and slags, the distribution of species between metal and slag, and slag viscosity on the basis of published data.
Keywords
Metallurgical Transaction Hide Node Excess Base Input Node Training Data PointPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- 1.A.S. Jordan:Metall. Trans., 1970, vol. 1, pp. 239–49.Google Scholar
- 2.M. Temkin:Acta Phys. URSS, 1945, vol. 20, pp. 411–20.Google Scholar
- 3.R. Schuhmann:Acta Metall., 1955, vol. 3, pp. 219–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.C.R. Masson:Proc. R. Soc. Ser. A., 1965, vol. 287, pp. 201–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.H. Flood and K. Grjotheim:J. Iron Steel Inst. (London), 1952, vol. 171, pp. 64–70.Google Scholar
- 6.ET. Turkdogan:Physical Chemistry of High Temperature Technology, Academic Press, New York, NY, 1980.Google Scholar
- 7.Y.K. Rao:Stoichiometry and Thermodynamics of Metallurgical Processes, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom, 1985.Google Scholar
- 8.M.A. Reuter and T.J. Van Der Walt:Chem. Eng. Sci., 1992, in press.Google Scholar
- 9.R.P. Lippmann:IEEE ASSP Mag., 1987, no. 4, pp. 4–21.Google Scholar
- 10.D.E. Rumelhart, G.E. Hinton, and R.J. Williams: inParallel Distributed Processing, D.E. Rumelhart and J.L. McClelland, eds., MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1986, vol. 1.Google Scholar
- 11.M.J.D. Powell:Math. Prog., 1977, vol. 12 (4), pp.241–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.B. Predel and U. Schallner:Mater. Sci. Eng., 1969-1970, vol. 5, pp. 210–19.Google Scholar
- 13.W. Oelsen and H.G. Schubert:Arch. Eisenhüttenwes., 1964, vol. 11, pp. 1039–57.Google Scholar
- 14.J. Taylor and J.J. Stobo:J. Iron Steel Inst., 1954 no. 12, pp. 360–67.Google Scholar
- 15.G.G. Hatch and J. Chipman:Trans. Am. Inst. Min. Met. Eng., 1949, vol. 185, pp. 274–84.Google Scholar
- 16.A.D. Kulkarni:Metall. Trans., 1973, vol. 4, pp. 1713–21.Google Scholar
- 17.R. Altman and H.H. Kellogg:Trans. Inst. Min. Metall., 1972, no. 9, pp. C163–C175.Google Scholar
- 18.W.J. Rankin:Metall. Trans. B, 1986, vol. 17B, pp. 61–68.Google Scholar
- 19.T.P. Battle and J.P. Hager:Metall. Trans. B, 1990, vol. 21B, pp. 501–10.Google Scholar