Plastic work of fatigue crack propagation in steels and aluminum alloys
- 98 Downloads
- 31 Citations
Abstract
The plastic work per unit area of fatigue crack propagation,U, is one of the parameters controlling the rate of fatigue crack propagation,dc/dN. The equation,dc/dN = A ΔK 4/(σfy 2μ U), was previously shown to fit the data for 7 iron and aluminum base alloys for the range of thedc/dN vs ΔK curve where the Paris relation is valid. Values ofU are now available for 6 additional alloys covering a much wider range of σy 42 to 868 MN/m2. For the total populationA = (2.8 ± 0.9) X 10-3 where 2.8 is the mean and 0.9 is the standard deviation. In this equation, σy is the 0.2 pct offset cyclic yield stress and μ is the shear modulus. The parameterU is related to microstructure and should be of interest to the metallurgist. Generally,U varies oppositely to σy due to decrease in the plastic zone size; however, the plastic strain amplitude and degree of localization of the plastic strain in the plastic zone are also important.
Keywords
Aluminum Alloy Metallurgical Transaction Plastic Zone Fatigue Crack Propagation Plastic WorkPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- 1.J. Weertman:Int. J. Fract. Mech., 1973, vol. 9, p. 125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 2.T. Mura and C. T. Lin:Int. J. Fract. Mech., 1974, vol. 10, p. 284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3.J. R. Rice: ASTM STP 415, p. 247, 1967.Google Scholar
- 4.G. P. Cherepanov:Int. J. Solids Struct., 1968, vol. 4, p. 811.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.Y. Izumi, M. E. Fine, and T. Mura: “Energy Considerations in the Fatigue Crack Propagation”,Int. J. Fract. Mech. (in press).Google Scholar
- 6.T. Mura and C. Vilmann: “Fatigue Crack Propagation Related to a Dislocation Distribution”,J. Appl. Mech., ASME (in press).Google Scholar
- 7.P. E. Irving and L. N. McCartney:Met. Sci., Aug./Sept. 1977, p. 351.Google Scholar
- 8.J. Weertman:Fracture Mechanics, p. 193, N. Perrone, H. Liebowitz, D. Mulville and W. Pilkey, eds., University Press of Virginia, Charlotteville, 1978;Fatigue Crack Propagation Theories, ASM Symposium: Fatigue and Microstructure, p. 279, St. Louis, Oct. 1978.Google Scholar
- 9.S. Ikeda, Y. Izumi, and M. E. Fine:Eng. Fract. Mech., 1977, vol. 9, p. 123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.Y. Izumi and M. E. Fine:Eng. Fract. Mech., 1979, vol. 11, p. 791.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.M. E. Fine and Y. Izumi:Proc. 4th Int. Conf. on the Strength of Metals and Alloys, vol. 2, p. 468, Nancy, France, 1976.Google Scholar
- 12.P. K. Liaw, M. E. Fine, and D. L. Davidson: “Comparison of Plastic Work of Fatigue Crack Propagation in Low Carbon Steel Measured by Strain-Gages and Electron Channeling”,Fatigue Eng. Mater. Struct. (in press).Google Scholar
- 13.Y. Izumi: Ph.D. Dissertation, 1978, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL.Google Scholar
- 14.S. Ikeda, T. Sakai and M. E. Fine:J. Mater. Sci., 1977, vol. 12, p. 675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.D. L. Davidson and J. Lankford, Jr.:Proc. of the Symposium “Environment-Sensitive Fracture of Engineering Materials”, Z. A. Foroulis, ed., p. 581, TMS-AIME, Warrendale, PA, 1979.Google Scholar
- 16.S. I. Kwun and M. E. Fine:Scr. Metall., 1980, vol. 14, p. 155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.S. I. Kwun and M. E. Fine: “Fatigue Macrocrack Growth in Tempered HY80, HY130 and 4140 Steels”,Fatigue Eng. Mater. Struct. (in press).Google Scholar
- 18.P. K. Liaw: Ph.D. Dissertation, 1980, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL.Google Scholar
- 19.S. I. Kwun: Ph.D. Dissertation, 1978, Marquette University, Milwaukee, WI.Google Scholar
- 20.S. I. Kwun and R. A. Fournelle:Met. Trans. A, 1980, vol. 11 A, p. 1429.Google Scholar
- 21.J. T. McGrath and W. J. Bratina:Acta Metall., 1967, vol. 15, p. 329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 22.C. Calabrese and C. Laird:Mater. Sci. Eng., 1974, vol. 13, p. 141. 23. C. E. Feltner and P. Beardmore: ASTM STP 467, p. 77, 1970.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 24.P. K. Liaw, M. E. Fine, M. Kiritani, and S. Ono:Scr. Metall., 1977, vol. 11, p. 1151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar