Annals of Dyslexia

, Volume 36, Issue 1, pp 138–153 | Cite as

Short-term memory, phonological processing, and reading ability

  • Susan Brady
Part II Research Reflections

Abstract

Verbal short-term memory deficits are a common characteristic of children with reading problems and may markedly increase the difficulty of learning to read. Previous work suggests that the basis of the short-term memory deficit may involve limitations in phonetic coding. In the present paper, a series of experiments are reviewed which examined the role of phonological processes in short-term memory. First, a developmental study is described in which a significant relationship was found between phonetic processes and verbal memory span, but not between phonetic processes and nonverbal memory. Second, additional studies are reviewed which collectively found that children with reading problems are less accurate at phonetic encoding than are good readers, and that performance on phonetic processing corresponds with verbal memory span. No reading group differences were obtained on nonverbal perception or memory tasks. These findings suggest that both developmental and individual differences in verbal memory span are related to the efficiency of phonological processes. Practical implications of current cognitive research are discussed.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baddeley, A. 1966. Short-term memory for word sequences as a function of acoustic, semantic, and formal similarity.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 18:362–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baddeley, A. and Hitch, G. 1974. Working memory.In G. A. Bower, (ed.).The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, Vol. 8. New York. Academic Press.Google Scholar
  3. Baddeley, A., Thomson, N., and Buchanan, M. 1975. Word length and the structure of short-term memory.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 14:575–589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brady, S., Mann, V., and Schmidt, R. 1985. Errors in short term memory for good and poor readers.Haskins Laboratories Status Report on Speech Research SR-81: 85–103.Google Scholar
  5. Brady, S., Poggie, E., and Merlo, M. In press. An investigation of speech perception skills in children who differ in reading ability.Haskins Laboratories Status Report on Speech Research.Google Scholar
  6. Brady, S., Shankweiler, D., and Mann, V. 1983. Speech perception and memory coding in relation to reading ability.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 35:345–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Case, R., Kurland, D., and Goldberg, J. 1982. Operational efficiency and the growth of short-term memory span.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 33:386–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cermak, L., Goldberg, J., Cermak, S., and Drake, C. 1980. The short-term memory ability of children with learning disabilities.Journal of Learning Disabilities 13:25–29.Google Scholar
  9. Chi, M. T. H. 1976. Short-term memory limitations in children: Capacity or processing deficits?Memory and Cognition 4:559–572.Google Scholar
  10. Cohen, R. and Netley, C. 1981. Short-term memory deficits in reading disabled children in the absence of opportunity for rehearsal strategies.Intelligence 5:69–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Conrad, R. 1972. Speech and reading.In J. F. Kavanaugh, and I. G. Mattingly (eds.).Language by Ear and by Eye: The relationship between speech and reading. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  12. Corsi, R. M. 1972. Human memory and the medial temporal region of the brain. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, McGill University.Google Scholar
  13. Daneman, M. and Carpenter, P. 1980. Individual differences in working memory and reading.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 19:450–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dempster, F. N. 1981. Memory span: Sources of individual and developmental differences.Psychological Bulletin 89:63–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Engle, R. and Marshal, K. 1983. Do developmental changes in digit span result from acquisition strategies?Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 36:429–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hall, J., Wilson, K., Humphreys, M., Tinzmann, M., and Bowyer, P. 1983. Phonemic-similarity effects in good vs. poor readers.Memory and Cognition 11:520–527.Google Scholar
  17. Hanson, V. L., Liberman, I. Y., and Shankweiler, D. 1984. Linguistic coding by deaf children in relation to beginning reading success.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 37:378–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hoosian, R. 1982. Correlation between pronunciation speed and digit span size.Perceptual and Motor Skills 55:1128.Google Scholar
  19. Hulme, C., Thomson, N., Muir, C., and Lawrence, A. 1984. Speech rate and the development of short-term memory span.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 38:241–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Huttenlocher, J., and Burke, D. 1976. Why does memory span increase with age?Cognitive Psychology 8:1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jorm, A. 1983. Specific reading retardation and working memory: A review.British Journal of Psychology 74:311–342.Google Scholar
  22. Katz, R., Shankweiler, D., and Liberman, I. 1981. Memory for item order and phonetic recoding in the beginning reader.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 32:474–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. LaBerge, D. and Samuels, S. 1974. Towards a theory of automatic information processing in reading.Cognitive Psychology 6:293–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Liberman, I. 1983. A language-oriented view of reading and its disabilities.In H. Myklebust (ed.).Progress in Learning Disabilities, Vol. V. New York: Grune and Stratton.Google Scholar
  25. Liberman, I., Mann, V. A., Shankweiler, D., and Werfelman, M. 1982. Children’s memory for recurring linguistic and nonlinguistic material in relation to reading ability.Cortex 18:367–376.Google Scholar
  26. Liberman, I. and Shankweiler, D. 1985. Phonology and the problems of learning to read and write.Remedial and Special Education 6:8–17.Google Scholar
  27. Liberman, I. Y., Shankweiler, D., Blackman, B., Camp, L., and Werfelman, M. 1980. Steps toward literacy.In P. Levinson, and C. H. Sloan, (eds.).Auditory Processing and Language: Clinical and research perspectives. New York: Grune and Stratton.Google Scholar
  28. Liberman, I., Shankweiler, D., Liberman, A. M., Fowler, C., and Fischer, F. W. 1977. Phonetic segmentation and recoding in the beginning reader.In A. S. Reber, and D. Scarbrough, (eds.).Toward a Psychology of Reading: The Proceeding of the CUNY Conference. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  29. Mann, V. 1984. Reading skill and language skill.Developmental Review 4:1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mann, V. A. and Liberman, I. Y. 1984. Phonological awareness and verbal short-term memory: Can they presage early reading problems?Journal of Learning Disabilities 17:592–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Mann, V., Liberman, I., and Shankweiler, D. 1980. Children’s memory for sentences and word strings in relation to reading ability.Memory and Cognition 8:319–335.Google Scholar
  32. Mark, L. S., Shankweiler, D., Liberman, I. Y., and Fowler, C. A. 1977. Phonetic recoding and reading difficulty in beginning readers.Memory and Cognition 5:623–629.Google Scholar
  33. Merlo, M. and Brady, S. In preparation. Reading ability and short-term memory: The role of phonetic processing.Google Scholar
  34. Milner, B. 1974. Hemispheric Specialization: Scope and limits.In F. O. Schmitt and F. G. Wording (eds.).The Neurosciences: Third Study Program. Cambridge, Ma.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  35. Olson, R., Davidson, B., Kliegl, R., and Davies, S. 1984. Development of phonetic memory in disabled and normal readers.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 37:187–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Perfetti, C. 1985.Reading Ability. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Perfetti, C., and Lesgold, A. 1977. Discourse, comprehension, and sources of individual differences.In M. A. Just and P. A. Carpenter (eds.).Cognitive Processes in Comprehension. Hillsdale, N.J.: ErlbaumGoogle Scholar
  38. Perfetti, C. and Lesgold, A. 1979. Coding and comprehension in skilled reading and implications for reading instruction.In L. B. Resnick, and P. Weaver, (eds.).Theory and Practice in Early Reading. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  39. Rabbitt, P. M. A. 1968. Channel-capacity, intelligibility and immediate memory.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 20:241–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Samuel, A. G. 1978. Organizational vs. retrieval factors in the development of digit span.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 26:308–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Shankweiler, D. and Crain, S. In preparation. Language mechanisms and reading disorders: a modular approach.Google Scholar
  42. Shankweiler, D., Liberman, I. Y., Mark, L. S., Fowler, C. A., and Fischer, F. W. 1979. The speech code and learning to read.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human learning and memory 5:531–545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Stanovich, K. 1982. Individual differences in the cognitive processes of reading: I. Word decoding.Journal of Learning Disabilities 15:485–493.Google Scholar
  44. Stanovich, K. 1985. Explaining the variance in reading ability in terms of psychological processes: What have we learned?Annals of Dyslexia 35: 67–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Torgesen, J. and Houck, D. 1980. Processing deficiencies of learning-disabled children who perform poorly on the digit span test.Journal of Educational Psychology 72:141–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Tzeng, O. J. L., Hung, D. L., and Wang, W. S. Y. 1977. Speech recoding in reading.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory 3:621–630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Vellutino, F. 1979.Dyslexia: Theory and research. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  48. Vellutino, F., Pruzek, R., Steger, J., and Meshoulam, V. 1973. Immediate visual recall in poor and normal readers as a function of orthographic-linguistic familiarity.Cortex 9:368–384.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Orton Dyslexia Society 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • Susan Brady
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.University of Rhode IslandKingston
  2. 2.Haskins LaboratoriesNew Haven

Personalised recommendations