Phase equilibrium in two-phase coherent solids
- 177 Downloads
- 74 Citations
Abstract
Phase equilibrium in a two-phase stressed coherent solid is analyzed using the thermodynamic equilibrium conditions directly. Subject to the constraints of constant temperature and external pressure, a bulk alloy composition is chosen and the corresponding volume fractions and phase compositions that satisfy the equilibrium conditions are obtained. We demonstrate unequivocally that, unlike fluids, a number of equilibrium states (combinations of volume fractions and phase composition) may exist that yield energy minima for a given temperature, pressure, and alloy composition and that these multiple metastable states may lead to a nonuniqueness in the observed physical state of the system. In addition, we show that discontinuous jumps in precipitate volume fraction both between 0 and 1 as well as jumps within the range 0 to 1 are possible with a smooth variation in alloy composition. These results are a consequence of the elastic energy, and thus the system energy, being a function of the volume fraction when two phases coexist as coherent solids. As it is difficult to display these effects on a coherent phase diagram, the concept of a phase stability diagram is introduced for both displaying and analyzing the equilibrium conditions in coherent solids. The influence of elastic inhomogeneity and the form of the free energy curves as a function of composition in the absence of stress on phase equilibrium are examined.
Keywords
Metallurgical Transaction Alloy Composition Coherency Strain Global Energy Minimum Free Energy CurvePreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- 1.J. W. Gibbs: Scientific Papers, vol. 1, Longmans, 1906, reprinted by Dover, New York, NY, 1961, pp. 1-54. 2. M. Hillert: in Lectures on the Theory of Phase Transformations, H. I. Aaronson, ed., TMS-AIME, New York, NY, 1975, pp. 1–50.Google Scholar
- 3.F. C. Lärche and J. W. Cahn:Acta Metall., 1978, vol. 26, pp. 1579–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.F. C. Lärche and J. W. Cahn:Acta Metall., 1973, vol. 21, pp. 1051–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.W. C. Johnson and J. I. D. Alexander:J. Appl. Phys., 1986, vol. 59, pp. 2735–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.W. W. Mullins and R. F. Sekerka:J. Chem. Phys., 1985, vol. 82, pp. 5192–5202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.M. Hillert:Metall. Trans. A, 1984, vol. 15A, pp. 411–19.Google Scholar
- 8.F. C. Larche and J. W. Cahn:Acta Metall., 1985, vol. 33,pp. 331–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.J. W. Cahn:Acta Metall., 1962, vol. 10, pp. 907–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.R. O. Williams:CALPHAD, 1984, vol. 8, pp. 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.R. O. Williams:Metall. Trans. A, 1980, vol. 11A, pp. 247–53.Google Scholar
- 12.J. W. Cahn and F. C. Larche:Acta Metall., 1984, vol. 32, pp. 1915–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.W. C. Johnson:Metall. Trans. A, 1987, vol. 18A, pp. 1093–97.Google Scholar
- 14.J. W. Cahn:Acta Metall., 1961, vol. 9, pp. 795–801.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.J. D. Eshelby:Proc. Roy. Soc., 1957, vol. 241A, pp. 376–96.Google Scholar
- 16.W. C. Johnson:Acta Metall., 1984, vol. 32, pp. 465–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.P. W. Voorhees, W.C. Johnson, and V.J. Laraia: inSolute-Defect Interaction, S. Saimoto, G.R. Purdy, and G.V. Kidson, eds., Pergamon Press, Toronto, ON, 1986, pp. 409–25.Google Scholar
- 18.G. Iooss and D. D. Joseph:Elementary Stability and Bifurcation Theory, Springer-Verlag, New York, NY, 1980, pp. 1–44.Google Scholar
- 19.W. C. Johnson and J. W. Cahn:Acta Metall., 1984, vol. 32, pp. 1925–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar