Hydrogen transport through annealed and deformed armco iron
- 269 Downloads
- 120 Citations
Abstract
The effect of deformation and annealing on hydrogen transport through Armco Iron H.P. membranes was studied with an electro-chemical flux monitoring technique sensitive to 6 × 1010 atoms H/cm2-s. Hydrogen entry was effected by cathodic polarization at 1.8 mA/ cm2 in a 0.1 N sodium hydroxide solution. Steady state hydrogen transport at 300 K was virtually independent of processing history. The activation energy for permeation through annealed iron was 9.4 ± 0.5 kcal/mol, in reasonable agreement with previous results at higher temperatures. Two types of hydrogen traps were indicated by transient measurements on membranes with different processing histories. Type 1 traps could not be removed by annealing and are therefore thought to be deformation-induced microvoids. They explain the thickness-dependent diffusivities observed with annealed iron membranes in this and several earlier investigations. In agreement with this suggestion, membranes chemically reduced in thickness exhibited higher diffusivities than those mechanically reduced prior to annealing. Type 2 traps are also caused by deformation, but anneal out in the recovery range by a process which is not singly activated. These traps are not readily explained in terms of the stress field of a single dislocation and are probably associated with some feature of the dislocation cell structure caused by deformation.
Keywords
Effective Diffusivity Cathodic Polarization Absorption Transient Trap Density Armco IronPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- 1.J. T. Brown and W. M. Baldwin, Jr.:Trans. Met. Soc AIME, 1954, vol. 200, p. 298.Google Scholar
- 2.A. R. Troiano:Trans. ASM, 1960, vol. 52, p. 54.Google Scholar
- 3.Proceedings of Conference, Fundamental Aspects of Stress Corrosion Cracking, p. 439, National Association of Corrosion Engineers, Houston, 1969.Google Scholar
- 4.W. Geller and T. H. Sun:Arch. Eisenhuettenw., 1950, vol. 21, p. 423.Google Scholar
- 5.T. M. Stross and F. C. Tompkins: J. Chem. Soc., London, Part 1 1956, p. 230.Google Scholar
- 6.W. Eichenauer, H. Kunzig, and A. Pebler:Z. Metallic., 1958, vol. 49, p. 220.Google Scholar
- 7.E. W. Johnson and M. L. Hill:Trans. Met. Soc. AIME, 1960, vol. 218, p. 1104.Google Scholar
- 8.W. L. Bryan and B. F. Dodge:AlChE J., 1963, vol. 9, p. 223.Google Scholar
- 9.M. A. V. Devanathan, Z. Stachurski, and W. Beck:J. Electrochem. Soc., 1963, vol. 110, p. 886.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.R. Wagner and R. Sizmann:Z. Angew. Phys., 1964, vol. 18, p. 193.Google Scholar
- 11.J. McBreen: Ph.D. Thesis, university of Pennsylvania, 1965.Google Scholar
- 12.S. Wach, A. P. Miodownik, and J. Mackowiak:Corrosion Sci., 1966, vol. 6, p. 271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.Th. Heumann and D. Primas:Z. Naturforsch, 1966, vol. 21 A, p. 260.Google Scholar
- 14.G. M. Evans and E. C. Rollason:J. Iron Steel Inst., 1969, vol. 207, p. 1484.Google Scholar
- 15.P. K. Subramanyan: PH.D. Thesis, University.of Pennsylvania, 1970.Google Scholar
- 16.S. Wach and A. P. Miodownik:Trans. Faraday Soc., 1970, vol. 66, p. 2334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.J. Y. Choi:Met. Trans., 1970, vol. I, p.911.Google Scholar
- 18.H. G. Nelson and J. E. Stein:Gas Phase Hydrogen Permeation through Alpha Iron, 4130 Steel and 304 Stainless Steel from Less than 100°C to Near 600°C, NASA TN D-7265, 1972.Google Scholar
- 19.J. L. Dillard and S. Talbot-Besnard: Extrait de L'Hydrogene Dans Les Metaux, vol. 1, Editions Science et Industrie, Paris, 1973.Google Scholar
- 20.R. A. Oriani:Acta Met., 1970, vol. 18, p. 147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 21.F. C. Frank and D. Turnbull:Phys. Rev., 1956, vol. 104, p. 617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 22.A. McNabb and P. K. Foster:Trans. Met. Soc. AIME, 1963, vol. 227, p. 618.Google Scholar
- 23.J. H. Keeler and H. M. Davis:J. Metals, 1953, vol. 5, p. 44.Google Scholar
- 24.G.M. Evans and E.C. Rollason:J. Iron Steel Inst., 1969, vol. 207, p. 1591.Google Scholar
- 25.G. M. Evans and E. C. Rollason:J. Iron Steel Inst., 1969, vol. 207, p. 1484.Google Scholar
- 26.M. A. V. Devanathan and Z. Stachurski:Proc. Roy. Soc., 1962, vol. A270, p. 90.Google Scholar
- 27.F. A. Lewis: The Palladium Hydrogen System, p. 7, Academic Press, New York, 1967.Google Scholar
- 28.S. Wach:Brit. Corros. J., 1971,vol. 6, p. 114.Google Scholar
- 29.H. S. Carslaw and J. C. Jaeger: Conduction of Heat in Solids, Oxford University Press, Ely House, London, 1959.Google Scholar
- 30.J. McBreen, L. Nanis, and W. Beck:J. Electrochem. Soc., 1966, vol. 113, p. 1219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 31.O. D. Gonzalez:Trans. Met. Soc. AIME, 1969, vol. 245, p. 607.Google Scholar
- 32.W. Raczynski:Arch. Hutnictiva, 1958, vol. 3, p. 59.Google Scholar
- 33.T. P. Radhakrishnan and L. L. Shreir:Electrochim. Acta, 1967, vol. 12, p. 889.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 34.H. R. Heath:Brit. J. Appl. Phys., 1952, vol. 3, p. 13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 35.A. Krupkowski and M. Smialowski:Arch. Hutnictiva, 1956, vol. 1, p. 101.Google Scholar
- 36.J.O'M. Bockris and P. K. Subramanyan:J. Electrochem. Soc., 1971, vol. 118, p. 1114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 37.H. G. Ellerbrock, G. Vibrans, and H. P. Stuive: Acta Met.; 1972, vol. 20, p. 53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 38.A. S. Keh:Direct Observation of Imperfections in Crystals, J. B. Newkirk and J. H. Wernick, eds., p. 213, Interscience Publishers, New York, 1962.Google Scholar
- 39.J. T. Michalak and H. W. Paxton: Trans. Met. Soc. AIME, 1961, vol. 221 p. 850.Google Scholar
- 40.H. J. Rack: Ph.D. Thesis, M.I.T., 1968.Google Scholar