Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

A debate on the bainite reaction

  • 809 Accesses

  • 197 Citations

Abstract

The authors debate three topics central to the controversies which have enveloped the bainite reaction ever since it was first recognized as a distinctive mode of austenite decomposition. These include: “what is bainite?”, “the growth mechanism of the ferritic component of bainite”, and “the sources of bainitic carbide precipitation.” RFH concludes that bainite is the product of a shear transformation. Individual bainite plates are suggested to grow substantially more rapidly than volume diffusion-control allows, but a constraint such as the build-up of volume strain energy limits the extent of their growth. This mechanism of growth ensures extensive supersaturation of bainitic ferrite with respect to carbon. Whether or not carbides precipitate in association with bainite plates and whether the carbide is cementite orε, however, is a complex question in competitive reaction kinetics. New experimental evidence is presented to demonstrate thatε carbide precipitated in lower bainite dissolves upon heating above the kinetic-B stemperature in an alloy steel containing 1.5 pct Si. This result is taken to support the existence of the metastable eutectoid reactionγ ⇌ α + ε atca 350°C. HIA and KRK define bainite as the product of a nonlamellar eutectoid reaction. On this view, carbide precipitation thus plays an essential, rather than an ancillary role. Development of the Widmanstatten morphology by the ferritic component of bainite is shown to be inessential to the classification of a eutectoid structure as bainite. When this morphology is present, however, it is concluded to grow by the ledge mechanism, without the participation of shear, at rates of the order of or less than those allowed by volume diffusion-control. New experimental evidence is presented to show that the lengthening and thickening kinetics of individual plates within sheaves of upper bainite are consistent with this description. The results of a new calculation indicate that the initial carbon content of bainite plates lies between theα/α + Fe3C) and the extrapolatedα/(α+ γ) phase boundaries, in agreement with expectation from the ledge mechanism of growth.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. 1.

    E. S. Davenport and E. C. Bain:Trans. AIME, 1930, vol. 90, p. 117.

  2. 2.

    H. I. Aaronson:Inst. Metals, Monogr. 33, 1969, p. 270.

  3. 3.

    R. F. Mehl:Hardenability of Alloy Steels, ASM, 1939, p. 1.

  4. 4.

    A. Hultgren:Trans. ASM, 1947, vol. 39, p. 915.

  5. 5.

    D. N. Shackleton and P. M. Kelly:Iron Steel Inst., London, Spec. Rep. 93, 1965, p. 126.

  6. 6.

    K. Shimizu and Z. Nishiyama:Mem. Inst, Sci. Ind. Res., Osaka Unit., 1963, vol. 20, p. 43.

  7. 7.

    T. Ko and S. A. Cottrell:J Iron Steel Inst., 1952, vol. 172, p. 307.

  8. 8.

    K. Tsuya:J. Mech. Lab., Japan, 1956, vol. 2, p. 20.

  9. 9.

    G. R Speich and M. Cohen:Trans. TMS-AIME, 1960, vol. 218, p. 1050.

  10. 10.

    R. H. Goodenow, S. J. Matas, and R. F. Hehemann:Trans. TMS-AIME, 1963, vol. 227, p. 651.

  11. 11.

    G. R. Srinivasan and C. M. Wayman:ActaMet, 1968, vol. 16, p. 621.

  12. 12.

    J. W. Christian:The Theory of Transformations in Metals and Alloys, Pergamon Press, New York, 1965.

  13. 13.

    L. Kaufman, S. V. Radcliffe, and M. Cohen:Decomposition of Austenite by Diffusional Processes, p. 313, Interscience, New York, 1962.

  14. 14.

    A. P. Miodownik,J. Inst. Metals, 1954–55, vol. 83, p. 561.

  15. 15.

    T. Lyman and A. R. Tioiano:Trans. AIME, 1945, vol. 162, p. 196.

  16. 16.

    M. Cohenet al.:Perspectives in Materials Research, NAS-NRC for ONR, U. S. Government Printing Office, 1963, p. 309.

  17. 17.

    J.M. Robertson:J. Iron Steel Inst, 1929,vol. 119, p, 391.

  18. 18.

    A. Hultgren:Jernkontorets Ann., 1951, vol. 135, p. 403;Kgl. Svenska Vetenskapsakad. Handl, 1953, vol. 4, Ser. 4.

  19. 19.

    F. Wever and E. Lange:Mitt. Kaiser Wilhelm Inst. Eisenforsch., 1932, vol. 14, p. 71.

  20. 20.

    K. R. Kinsman and H. I. Aaronson:Transformation and Hardenability in Steels, p. 39, Climax Molybdenum Company, Ann Arbor, 1967.

  21. 21.

    P. Boswell: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Mass., K. R. Kinsman and H. I. Aaronson, Ford Motor Co., Dearborn, Mich., unpublished research, 1970.

  22. 22.

    T. Ko:J. Iron Steel Inst, 1953, vol. 175, p. 16.

  23. 23.

    C. A. Dubé, H. I. Aaronson, and R. F. Mehl:Rev. Met, (Paris), 1958, vol. 55, p. 201.

  24. 24.

    H. I. Aaronson and K. R. Kinsman: Ford Motor Co., Dearborn, Mich., and P. Boswell: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Mass., unpublished research, 1970.

  25. 25.

    T. Lyman and A. R. Troiano:Trans. ASM, 1946, vol. 37, p. 402.

  26. 26.

    J. S. Bowles and J. K. Mackenzie:ActaMet, 1954, vol. 2, pp. 129, 138, 224.

  27. 27.

    M. S. Wechsler, D. S. Lieberman, and T. A. Read:Trans. AIME, 1953, vol. 194, p. 1503.

  28. 28.

    J. W. Christian:Decomposition ofAustenite by Diffusional Processes, p. 371, Interscience Publishers, New York, 1962.

  29. 29.

    H. M. Clark and C. M. Wayman:Phase Transformations, p. 59, ASM, Metals Park, Ohio, 1970.

  30. 30.

    J. M. Oblak, R. H. Goodenow, and R. F. Hehemann:Trans. TMS-AIME, 1964, vol. 230, p. 258.

  31. 31.

    E. Eichen, H. I. Aaronson, G. M. Pound, and R. Trivedi:ActaMet, 1966, vol. 14, p. 1637.

  32. 32.

    K. R. Kinsman, E. Eichen, and H. I. Aaronson: Ford Motor Co., Dearborn, Mich., unpublished research, 1971.

  33. 33.

    G. R. Speich,Decomposition of Austenite by Diffusional Processes, p. 353, Interscience Publishers, New York, 1962.

  34. 34.

    R. D. Garwood:Iron Steel Inst., London, Spec. Rep. No. 93, 1965, p. 90.

  35. 35.

    P. E. Repas and R. F. Hehemann: Tech. Rep. No. 6 to ONR, ContractNonr 1141(15), June, 1967.

  36. 36.

    G. R. Purdy:Met. Sci. J., 1971, vol. 5, p. 81.

  37. 37.

    P. E. J. Flewitt and J. M. T owner,J Inst. Metals, 1967, vol. 95, p. 273.

  38. 38.

    H. I. Aaronson, C. Laird, and K. R. Kinsman:Phase Transformations, p. 313, ASM, Metals Park, Ohio, 1970.

  39. 39.

    M. Hillert:Jernkontorets Ann., 1957, vol. 141, p. 757.

  40. 40.

    M. Hillert:Decomposition of Austenite by Diffusional Processes, p. 197, Interscience Publishers, New York, 1962.

  41. 41.

    B. N. Bose and M. F. Hawkes:Trans. AIME, 1950, vol. 188, p. 307.

  42. 42.

    H. I. Aaronson, W. B. Triplett, and G. M. Andes:Trans. TMS-AIME, 1960, vol. 209, p. 331.

  43. 43.

    C. W. Spencer and D. J. Mack:Decomposition of Austenite by Diffusional Processes, p. 549, Interscience Publishers, New York, 1962.

  44. 44.

    R. H. Goodenow and R. F. Hehemann:Trans. TMS-AIME, 1965, vol. 233, p. 1777.

  45. 45.

    M. M. Rao and P. G. Winchell:Trans. TMS-AIME, 1967, vol. 239, p. 956.

  46. 46.

    E. A. Wilson,ScriptaMet, 1970, vol. 4, p. 309

  47. 47.

    E. L. F. Weisner and E. Hornbogen:ScriptaMet, 1969, vol. 3, p. 243.

  48. 48.

    S. Bhattacharyya and G. L. Kehl:Trans. ASM, 1955, vol. 47, p. 351.

  49. 49.

    J. M. Oblak and R. F. Hehemann:Transformation and Hardenability in Steel, p. 15, Climax Molybdenum Company, Ann Arbor, 1967.

  50. 50.

    R. H. Goodenow and R. F. Hehemann: Discussion inDecomposition of Austenite by DiffusionalProcesses, p. 367, Interscience Publishers, New York, 1962.

  51. 51.

    R. H. Goodenow, R. H. Barkalow, and R. F. Hehemann:Physical Properties of Martensite and Bainite, p. 135, Spec. Rep. No. 93, The Iron and Steel Institute (London), 1965.

  52. 52.

    R. H. Goodenow: M. S. Thesis, Case Institute of Technology, 1962.

  53. 53.

    R. F. Hehemann:Phase Transformations, p. 397, ASM, Metals Park, Ohio, 1970.

  54. 54.

    M. Lange and K. Mathieu:Mitt. Kaiser Wilhelm Inst. Eisenforsch., 1938, vol. 20, p. 125.

  55. 55.

    J. P. Sheehan, C. A. Julien, and A. R. Troiano:Trans. ASM, 1949, vol. 41, p. 1165.

  56. 56.

    A. B. Greninger and A. R. Troiano:Trans.AIME, 1940, vol. 140, p. 311.

  57. 57.

    J. R. Vilella:Trans. AIME, 1940, vol. 140, p. 332.

  58. 58.

    W. Jellinghaus:Arch. Eisenhüttenw., 1957, vol. 28, p. 469.

  59. 59.

    T. G. Nilan:Trans. TMS-AIME, 1967, vol. 239, p. 898.

  60. 60.

    T. G. Nilan:Transformation and Hardenability in Steels, p. 57, Climax Molybdenum Company, Ann Arbor, 1967.

  61. 61.

    H. I. Aaronson:Decomposition of Austenite by Diffusional Processes, p. 387, Interscience Publishers, New York, 1962.

  62. 62.

    H. I. Aaronson: Ph.D. Thesis, Carnegie Institute of Technology, 1954.

  63. 63.

    J. M. Chilton and G. R. Speich:Met. Trans., 1970, vol. 1, p. 1019.

  64. 64.

    L. J. Habraken:C. R., Rech. Trav. Cen. Nat. Rech. Met., No. 19, 1957.

  65. 65.

    L. J. Habraken and M. Economopoulos:Transformation and Hardenability in Steels, p. 69, Climax Molybdenum Company, Ann Arbor, 1967.

  66. 66.

    H. I. Aaronson and C. Wells:Tram. AIME, 1955, vol. 203, p. 1002.

  67. 67.

    A. T. Davenport, F. G. Berry, and R. W. K. Honeycombe:Met. Sci. J., 1968, vol. 2, p. 104.

  68. 68.

    R. Le Houllier, G. Begin and A. Dubé:Met. Trans., 1971, vol. 2, p. 2645.

  69. 69.

    S. J. Matas and R. F. Hehemann:Trans. TMS-AIME, 1961, vol. 221, p. 176.

  70. 70.

    F.|G. Berry, A. T. Davenport, and R. W. K. Honeycombe:Inst. Metals, Monog. No. 33, 1969, p. 288.

  71. 71.

    H. B. Aaron and H. I. Aaronson:Met. Trans., 1971, vol. 2, p. 23.

  72. 72.

    F. B. Pickering:Transformations and Hardenability in Steels, p. 109, Climax Molybdenum Company, Ann Arbor, 1967.

  73. 73.

    H. I. Aaronson and C. Wells:Trans. AIME, 1956, vol. 206, p. 1216.

  74. 74.

    R. Trivedi:Met. Trans., 1970, vol. 1, p. 921.

  75. 75.

    G. R. Purdy, McMaster Univ., Hamilton, Ontario, private communication, 1971.

  76. 76.

    F. J. Schoen and W. S. Owen:Met. Trans., 1971, vol. 2, p. 2431.

  77. 77.

    M. Hillert: unpublished research quoted in ref. 13.

  78. 78.

    R. D. Townsend and J. S. Kirkaldy:Trans. ASM, 1968, vol. 61, p. 605.

  79. 79.

    E. P. Simonen and R. Trivedi: Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, and H. I. Aaronson: Ford Motor Co., Dearborn, Mich., unpublished research, 1970.

  80. 80.

    K. R. Kinsman and H. I. Aaronson:Met. Trans., 1970, vol. 1, p. 1485.

  81. 81.

    G. J. Jones and R. Trivedi:J. Appl. Phys., in press.

  82. 82.

    W. L. Grube and S. R. Rouze:High Temperature-High Resolution Metallography, p. 313, Gordon and Breach, New York, 1967.

  83. 83.

    S. R. Rouze and W. L. Grube: General Motors Corp., Warren, Mich., private communication, 1971.

  84. 84.

    H. I. Aaronson, H. A. Domian, and G. M. Pound:Trans. TMS-AIME, 1966, vol. 236, p. 768.

  85. 85.

    J. W. Cahn, W. B. Hillig, and G. W. Sears:ActaMet, 1964, vol. 12, p. 1421.

  86. 86.

    J. S. Bowles and N. F. Kennon:J. Aust. Inst. Metals, 1960, vol. 5, p. 106.

  87. 87.

    N. F. Kennon and R. H. Edwards:J. Aust. Inst. Metals, 1970, vol. 15, p. 195.

  88. 88.

    S. K. Das and G. Thomas:Trans. ASM, 1969, vol. 62, p. 659.

  89. 89.

    A. R. Marder and G. Krauss:Trans. ASM, 1969, vol. 62, p. 957.

  90. 90.

    K. H. Eckelmeyer and G. Krauss: Lehigh Univ., Bethlehem, Pa., unpublished research, 1967.

  91. 91.

    Y. C. Liu and H. I. Aaronson:ActaMet., 1970, vol. 18, p. 845.

  92. 92.

    C. Laird and H. I. Aaronson:ActaMet., 1969, vol. 17, p. 505.

  93. 93.

    M. F. Smith, G. R. Speich, and M. Cohen:Trans. TMS-AIME, 1959, vol. 215, p. 528.

  94. 94.

    R. T. Howard and M. Cohen:Trans. AIME, 1948, vol. 176, p. 384.

  95. 95.

    R. F. Bunshah and R. F. Mehl:Trans. AIME, 1953, vol. 197, p. 1251.

  96. 96.

    L. Kaufman and M. Cohen:Progr. Metal Phys., 1958, vol. 7, p. 165.

  97. 97.

    J. W. Christian:Proc. Roy. Soc, 1951, vol. A206,p. 51.

  98. 98.

    A. Schrader and F. Wever:Arch. Eisenhüttenw., 1952, vol. 23, p. 489.

  99. 99.

    R. I. Entin:Decomposition of Austenite by Diffusional Processes, p. 295, Interscience Publishers, New York, 1962.

  100. 100.

    F. Wever and K. Mathieu:Mitt. Kaiser Wilhelm Inst. Eisenforsch., 1940, vol. 22, p. 9.

  101. 101.

    E. P. Klier and T. Lyman:Trans. AIME, 1944, vol. 158. p. 394.

  102. 102.

    A.S.T.M. Committee E-4:Trans. ASTM, 1950, vol. 50, p. 444, 1952, vol. 52, p. 543;Trans. ASTM, 1954, vol. 54, p. 568.

  103. 103.

    J. Deliry:Mem. Sci. Rev. Met, 1965, vol. 62, p. 527.

  104. 104.

    W. Richardson: M. S. Thesis, Case-Western Reserve University, 1971.

  105. 105.

    H. Modin and S. Modin:Jernkontorets Ann., 1955, vol. 139, p. 481.

  106. 106.

    S. M. Kaufman, G. M. Pound, and H. I. Aaronson:Trans. AIME, 1957, vol. 209, p. 855.

  107. 107.

    E. S. Davenport:Trans. ASM, 1939, vol. 27, p. 837.

  108. 108.

    J. R. Cruciger and J. R. Vilella:Trans. ASM, 1944, vol. 32, p. 195.

  109. 109.

    A. Hultgren:Trans. ASM, 1947, vol. 39, p. 915.

  110. 110.

    D. N. Shackleton and P. M.Kelly:ActaMet., 1967, vol. 15,p. 979.

  111. 111.

    N. P. Allen, L. B. Pfeil, and W. T. Griffiths:Iron Steel Inst, 1939, Spec. Rep. 24, p. 369.

  112. 112.

    P. Vasudevan, L. W. Graham, and H. J. Axon:J. Iron Steel Inst, 1958, vol. 190, p. 386.

  113. 113.

    L. P. Ivanova and A. G. Seleznev:Trudy Khar’kov. Politekh. Inst. V. I, Lenina, 1959, vol. 21, p. 23.

  114. 114.

    S. V. Radcliffe and E. C. Rollason:J Iron Steel Inst, 1959, vol. 191, p. 56.

  115. 115.

    A. Rose:Haerterei-Tech. Mitt, 1950, vol. 5, p. 44.

  116. 116.

    A. Rose and W. Peter:Stahl Eisen, 1952, vol. 72, p. 1063.

  117. 117.

    F. E. Werner, B. L. Averbach, and M. Cohen:Trans. AIME, 1956, vol. 206, p. 1484.

  118. 118.

    G. V. Kurdjumov and M. D. Perkas:Prob, in Phys. of Metallography and Phys. Met., 1951, vol. 2, p. 167.

  119. 119.

    K. R. Kinsman, E. Eichen, and H. I. Aaronson:Met. Trans., 1971, vol. 2, p. 346.

  120. 120.

    M. G. Hall, K. R. Kinsman, and H. I. Aaronson:J. Iron Steel Inst, in press.

  121. 121.

    H. I. Aaronson and K. R. Kinsman: Ford Motor Co., Dearborn, Mich., unpublished research, 1971.

  122. 122.

    H. Jolivet and A. Portevin:Compt. Rend., 1939, vol. 209, p. 556.

  123. 123.

    E. P. Klier and A. R. Troiano:Trans. AIME, 1945, vol. 162, p. 175.

  124. 124.

    F. Wever, A. Rose, and W. Peter:Arch. Eisenhüttenw., 1950, vol. 21, p. 367.

  125. 125.

    C. A. Dubé: Ph.D. Thesis, Carnegie Institute of Technology, 1948.

  126. 126.

    C. Zener:J. Appl. Phys., 1949, vol. 20, p. 950.

  127. 127.

    C. S. Roberts:Trans. AIME, 1953, vol. 197, p. 203.

  128. 128.

    H. I. Aaronson and H. A. Domian:Trans. TMS-AIME, 1966, vol. 236, p. 781.

  129. 129.

    L. M. Pevzner, T. D. Kubyushina, G. M. Rovenskii and A. I. Samoilov:Soviet Metallography and Treatment of Metals, 1956, no. 11, p. 2.

  130. 130.

    M. G. Hall, H. I. Aaronson, and K. R. Kinsman:Surface Sci, in press.

  131. 131.

    K. R. Kinsman and H. I. Aaronson: Discussion to Oblak and Heheman,Transformation and Hardenability in Steels, p. 33, Climax Molybdenum Co., Ann Arbor, 1967.

  132. 132.

    J. C. Fisher:Thermodynamics in Physical Metallurgy, p. 201, ASM, Metals Park, Ohio, 1950.

  133. 133.

    J. A. Klosterman: Inst. Metals, Monogr. 33, 1969, p. 143.

Download references

Author information

Additional information

H. I. AARONSON, formerly with Ford Motor Company

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hehemann, R.F., Kinsman, K.R. & Aaronson, H.I. A debate on the bainite reaction. MT 3, 1077–1094 (1972). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02642439

Download citation

Keywords

  • Ferrite
  • Austenite
  • Martensite
  • Cementite
  • Bainite