Metallurgical and Materials Transactions B

, Volume 3, Issue 2, pp 537–548 | Cite as

Structure and mechanical properties of the directionally solidified Al-Cu-Mg eutectic

  • G. Garmong
  • C. G. Rhodes
Mechanical Behaviour

Abstract

The ternary eutectic is located at Al-33.1 pct Cu-6.25 pet Mg and consists of an aluminum-rich phase, CuAl2, and CuMgAl2. In this work its morphology, crystallography, interfacial dislocation arrangements, and mechanical properties have been studied. The scale of the phases is proportional to the negative one-half power of the growth rate. The phases have preferred growth directions and, in many cases, preferred interfacial planes. Interfaces between the aluminum-rich and the CuMgAl2 lamellar phases are semicoherent, having a/2 〈110〉 {111} aluminum misfit dislocations spaced 300Å apart. The observed dislocations are imaged only in the aluminum and appear to be aluminum-phase slip dislocations. The deformation of the composite to failure in tension is macroscopically elastic, and the failure strength depends on growth rate. It is shown that Griffith brittle fracture theory may be applied to the failure process, with cracks developed in the CuMgAl2 phase during loading acting as the required Griffith cracks. A specific failure mechanism is proposed and related to observations of the fracture surface.

Keywords

Metallurgical Transaction Burger Vector Misfit Dislocation Ternary Eutectic Interfacial Dislocation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    G. A. Chadwick:Prog. Mater. Sci., 1963, vol. 12, p. 97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    M. J. Salkind, F. D. Lemkey, and F. D. George:Whisker Technology, A. P. Levitt, ed., Ch. 10, Wiley-Interscience, New York, 1970.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    F. S. Galasso:High Modulus Fibers and Composites, p. 86, Gordon and Breach, New York, 1969.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    K. A. Jackson and J. D. Hunt:Trans. TMS-AIME, 1966, vol. 236, p. 1129.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    H. E. Cline and J. L. Walter:Met. Trans., 1970, vol. 1, p. 2907.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    D. J. S. Cooksey and A. Hellawell:J. Inst. Metals, 1967, vol. 95, p. 183.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    L. M. Hogan, R. W. Kraft, and F. D. Lemkey,Advan. Mater. Res., vol. 5, H. Herman, ed., p. 83, Wiley-Interscience, New York, 1971.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    K. R. Van Horn, ed.:Aluminum, vol. I,Properties, Physical Metallurgy, and Phase Diagrams, pp. 52,384, American Society for Metals, Metals Park, Ohio, 1967.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    H. Perlitz and A. Westgren:Ark. Kemi, Mineral. Geol, 1943, vol. 16, p. 1.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    H. W. Kerr, J. A. Bell, and W. C. Winegard:J. Aust. Inst. Metals, 1965, vol. 10, p. 64.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    G. C. Weatherly:Metal. Sci. J., 1968, vol. 2, p. 25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    J. M. Silcock:J. Inst. Metals, 1961, vol. 89, p. 203.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    G. C. Weatherly and R. B.Nicholson:Phil Mag., 1968, vol. 17, p. 801.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    R. W. Kraft:Trans. TMS-AIME, 1962, vol. 224, p. 65.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    H. E. Cline, J. L. Walter, E. F. Koch, and L. M. Osika,Acta Met., 1971, vol. 19, p. 405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    M. H. Loretto and R. J. Wasilewski:Proc. of Second Int. Conf. on the Strength of Metals and Alloys, p. 113, American Society for Metals, Metals Park, Ohio, 1970.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    G. A. Alers and Y. C. Liu:Trans. TMS-AIME, 1966, vol. 236, p. 482.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    A. A. Griffith,Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc, 1920, vol. 221A, p. 163.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    A. S. Tetelman and A. J. McEvily, Jr.:Fracture of Structural Materials, p. 50, John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1967.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    E. D. Hondros, inInterfaces-Proc. Int. Conf, Melbourne, p. 77, Butterworths, 1969.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    G. A. Chadwick:Prog. Mater. Sci., 1963, vol. 12, p. 141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    E. Orowan:Progr. Phys. 1948, vol. XII, p. 185.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    C. F. Elam:Distortion of Metal Crystals, Figs. 1 and 2, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1935.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    A. S. Tetelman and A. J. McEvily, Jr.:Fracture of Structural Materials, p. 212, John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1967.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    F. W. Crossman, A. S. Yue, and A. E. Vidoz:Trans. TMS-AIME, 1969, vol. 245, p.397.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    H. Brooks: inMetal Interfaces, p. 50, American Society for Metals, Cleveland, 1952.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Metallurgical of Society of AIME 1972

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. Garmong
    • 1
  • C. G. Rhodes
    • 1
  1. 1.North American Rockwell Science CenterThousand Oaks

Personalised recommendations