Breast Cancer Research and Treatment

, Volume 18, Supplement 1, pp S107–S109

Early detection of breast cancer: Mammography

  • Carl J. D'Orsi
Article

Summary

Detection of early breast cancer utilizing mammography can be accomplished through more frequent and earlier use of the test as well as exploring techniques to improve sensitivity and specificity. Efforts at educating primary care physicians about the role of mammography as well as training technologists and radiologists in performing optimum examinations and correctly interpreting them is of prime importance.

The use of computers may aid in increasing the sensitivity of the examinations and may also provide improved feature analysis for the radiologist, thus enhancing the separation of benign and malignant disease. New technologies also show promise to improve the accuracy of mammography. Direct digital mammography and digital enhancement of standard mammograms are actively being investigated. The use of MRI and specifically31P spectroscopy shows initial promise to increase the specificity of mammography. Several clinical trials are also under way to assess a possible niche which fine needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) may occupy in the quest for early breast cancer detection. Any future collaborative work between Japan and Western countries should take into account the potential of these new methods for improving the sensitivity and specificity of mammography.

Key words

computers digital images education mammography MRI screening 

References

  1. 1.
    Seidman H, Mushinski MH: Breast cancer: Incidence, mortality, survival, and prognosis. In: Feig SA, McLelland R (eds) Breast Carcinoma: Current Diagnosis and Treatment. ACR and Maison, New York, 1983, p 9Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Fox S, Baum JK, Keas DS, Tsou CV: Breast cancer screening: The under use of mammography. Radiology 156: 607–611, 1985PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    D'Orsi CJ, Karellas A, Costanza ME, Gaw VP: Preliminary report of an intervention to improve mammography skills of radiologists. In: Anderson PN, Engstrom PF, Mortenson LE (eds) Advances in Cancer Control: Innovations and Research. Alan R Liss, New York, 1989, pp 151–157Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Eddy DM, Hasselblad V, McGuiney W, Hendee W: The value of mammography screening in women under age 50 years. JAMA 259: 1512, 1988PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Eddy DM, Hasselblad V, McGuiney W, Hendee W: Mammography screening in women under age 50 years. JAMA 260: 475, 1988Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sickles EA: Reduced-price mammography screening. Am J Roentgenol 149: 1153, 1987Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Feig SA: Low-dose mammography: Assessment of theoretical risk. In: Feig SA, McLelland R (eds) Breast Carcinoma: Current Diagnosis and Treatment. ACR and Maison, New York, 1983, p 69Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Tabar L, Faberberg G, Day NE, Holmberg L: What is the optimum interval between mammographic screening examinations? An analysis based on the latest results of the Swedish two-county breast screening trial. Br J Cancer 55: 547, 1987PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kimme-Smith C, Gold RH, Bassett LW, Gormley L, Morioka C: Diagnosis of breast calcifications: Comparison of contact, magnified, and television enhanced images. Am J Roentgenol 153: 963, 1989Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Olson SL, Fam BW, Winter PF, Scholz FJ, Lee AK, Gordon SE: Breast calcifications: Analysis of imaging properties. Radiology 169: 329–332, 1988PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Fam BW, Olson SL, Winter PF, Scholz FV: Algorithm for the detection of fine clustered calcifications on film mammograms. Radiology 169: 333–337, 1988PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Getty DJ, Pickett RM, D'Orsi CJ, Swetts JA: Enhanced interpretation of diagnostic images. Invest Radiol 23: 240, 1988PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Heywang SH, Basserman R, Fenzl G, Nathrath W, Beck R, Krischke I, Eiermann W: MRI of the breast. Histopathologic correlation. Eur J Radiol 7: 175–182, 1987PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Degoni H, Horowitz A, Itzchak Y: Breast tumors: Evaluation with31P MR spectroscopy. Radiology 161: 53–55, 1986Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bradamante S, Borchiesi E, Pilotti S, Borasi G: High resolution1H NMR spectroscopy in the diagnosis of breast cancer. Magn Reson Med 8: 440–449, 1988PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wollenberg NJ, Caya JG, Clowry LJ: Fine needle aspiration cytology of the breast. A review of 32 cases with statistical evaluation. Acta Cytol 29: 425, 1985PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Carl J. D'Orsi
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of RadiologyUniversity of Massachusetts Medical CenterNorth WorcesterUSA

Personalised recommendations