Occupational exposure to Cr(VI): comparison between chromium levels in lymphocytes, erythrocytes, and urine
- 99 Downloads
- 19 Citations
Abstract
The relationships between chromium (Cr) levels in lymphocytes, erythrocytes, urine, and ambient air were compared among 14 chrome-platers from a metallurgic plant in Bulgaria and two groups of local controls, one from the same heavily polluted industrial town as the chrome-platers (n=11) and one from a seaside resort town 100 km away (n=6). Among the chrome-platers, the Cr concentration in peripheral lymphocytes was positively correlated with total Cr and Cr(VI) levels in ambient air and with Cr excretion in urine. As compared to the controls, the chromeplaters had mean Cr levels in lymphocytes twice as high, in erythrocytes ninefold higher, and in urine fourfold to eightfold higher. Although Cr levels in urine and lymphocytes were similar between the two control groups, levels in erythrocytes were 3 times higher among subjects from the industrial area than among those from the seaside town. The study suggests that lymphocyte Cr could be a good indicator of the Cr body burden caused by high exposures to Cr(VI), such as in electroplating operations. In these conditions, erythrocyte Cr may be less useful, possibly owing to increased toxicity due to the high affinity of erythrocytes for Cr. However, when exposure is lower, such as in most environmental situations, erythrocyte Cr should provide a better and more sensitive index than lymphocyte Cr. By contrast, urinary Cr, which provides information on total Cr exposure, including Cr(III) from dietary and environmental sources, does not seem to be of value for studying occupational exposure to Cr(VI).
Key words
Chromate Chrome-plating Biomarkers Epidemiology Exposure assessmentPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- 1.Alexander J, Aaseth J (1995) Uptake of chromate in human red blood cells and isolated rat liver cells: the role of the anion carrier. Analyst 120Google Scholar
- 2.Bruce G, Colton T, Doull J, Marks J, Smith R (1993) Designing a biological monitoring program to assess community exposure to chromium: conclusions of an expert panel. J Toxicol Environ Health 40:555–583PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3.Bukowski J, Goldstein M, Korn L, Johnson B (1991) Biological markers in chromium exposure assessment: confounding variables. Arch Environ Health 46:230–236PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.Burrows D, Adams RM (1990) Metals. In: Occupational skin disease, 2nd edn. Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 349–386Google Scholar
- 5.Coogan T, Squibb K, Motz J, Kinney P, Costa M (1991) Distribution of chromium within cells of the blood. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 108:157–166PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.De Flora S, Wetterhahn K (1989) Mechanisms of chromium metabolism and genotoxicity. Life Chem Rep 7:169–244Google Scholar
- 7.Gao M, Levy LS, Braithwaite RA, Brown SS (1993) Monitoring of total chromium in rat fluids and lymphocytes following intratracheal administration of soluble trivalent and hexavalent chromium compounds, Hum Exp Toxicol 12:377–382PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 8.IARC 1990, Chromium, nickel and welding. Monograph on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risk to Humans, vol 49Google Scholar
- 9.Korallus U, Harzdorf C, Lewalter J (1984) Experimental bases for ascorbic acid therapy of poisoning by hexavalent chromium compounds. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 53:247–256PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.Kortenkamp A, Beyersmann D, O'Brien P (1987) Uptake of Cr(III) complexes by erythrocytes. Toxicol Environ Chem 14:23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.Lewalter J, Korallus U, Harzdorf C, Weidemann H (1985) Chromium bond detection in isolated erythrocytes: a new principle of biological monitoring of exposure to hexavalent chromium. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 55:305–318PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.Minoia C, Apostoli P, Maranelli G, Baldi C, Pozzoli L, Capodaglio E (1988) Urinary chromium levels in subjects living in two north Italy regions. Sci Total Environ 71:527–531PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.Cohen MD, Kargacin B, Klein CB, Costa M (1993) Mechanisms of chromium carcinogenicity and toxicity. Crit Rev Toxicol 23:255–281PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 14.Perera F (1987) The potential usefulness of biological markers in risk assessment. Environ Health Perspect 76:141–145PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.Rahkonen E, Junttila M, Kalliomaki P, Olkinouora M, Kallionaki K (1983) Evaluation of biological monitoring among stainless steel welders. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 52:243–255PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16.Standeven A, Wetterhahn K (1991) Is there a role for reactive oxygen species in the mechanism of Cr(VI) carcinogenesis? Chem Res Toxicol 4:616–625PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.Taioli E, Zhitkovich A, Kinney P, Udasin I, Toniolo P, Costa M (1994) Application of reliability models to studies of biomarker validation. Environ Health Perspect 102:306–309PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 18.Threshold Limit Values and Biological Exposure Indices (1993–1994) American Conference of Governmental Industrial HygienistsGoogle Scholar
- 19.Vezza M, Giuliani D, Rao D, Morse B (1987) Chromium-51 dosimetry of lymphocytes labeled incidentally during nuclear medicine procedures, Nucl Med Biol 14:75–77Google Scholar