How do physicians talk with their patients about risks?
- 66 Downloads
- 31 Citations
Abstract
To describe the communication about risk between community-based physicians and their patients, the authors audiotaped 160 physician-patient encounters in the private practices of 19 physicians. Coding was done using a structured scheme to identify the presence of talk about risk of future illness, and to describe its characteristics. Patient understanding and satisfaction were assessed through an interview. Risk discussion occurred in 26% (95% CI 19%–33%) of the visits, quantitatively in two cases and specifically with respect to outcome in 48% (95% CI 40%–56%) of the visits. The patients initiated only 16% of this discussion but were, in general, satisfied with their care and the information they had received, but they had poor recall of the specifics of the discussion.
Key words
physician-patient interaction risk prevention communicationPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- 1.Forrow L, Taylor WC, Arnold RM. Absolutely relative: how research results are summarized can affect treatment decisions. Am J Med. 1992;92:121–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 2.Naylor DC, Chen E, Strauss B. Measured enthusiasm: does the method of reporting trial results alter perceptions of therapeutic effectiveness? Ann Intern Med. 1992;117:916–21.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 3.Tape TG, Wigton RS. Medical students and residents’ estimates of cardiac risk. Med Decis Making. 1989;9:170–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.Siminoff LA. Cancer patient and physician communication: progress and continuing problems. Ann Behav Med. 1989;11:108–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.McNeil BJ, Pauker SG, Sox HC, Tversky A. On the elicitation of preferences of alternative therapies. N Engl J Med. 1982;306:1259–62.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.Malenka DJ, Baron JA, Johansen S, Wahrenberger JW, Ross JM. The framing effect of relative and absolute risk. J Gen Intern Med. 1993;8:43–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.McNeil BJ, Weichselbaum R, Pauker SG. Fallacy of the five-year survival in lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 1978;299:1397–401.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.Siminoff LA, Fetting JH. Effects of outcome framing on treatment decisions in the real world: impact of framing adjuvant breast cancer decisions. Med Decis Making. 1989;9:262–71.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.Siminoff LA, Fetting JH, Abeloff MD. Doctor-patient communication about breast cancer adjuvant therapy. J Clin Oncol. 1989;7:1192–200.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 10.National Research Council. Improving risk communication. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1989.Google Scholar
- 11.Travis CB, Phillippi RH, Tonn BE. Judgment heuristics and medical decisions. Patient Educ Counseling. 1989;13:211–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.Berger ES, Hendee WR. The expression of health risk information. Arch Intern Med. 1989;14:1507–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.Stefanek M. Counseling women at high risk for breast cancer. Oncology. 1990;4(1):27–33.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 14.Kong A, Barnett OMGO, Mosteller F, Youtz C. How medical professionals evaluate expressions of probability. N Engl J Med. 1986;315:740–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.Life and death in the fast lane [editorial]. New York Times. 1989;Oct 7:E22.Google Scholar
- 16.Slovic P. Perception of risk. Science. 1987;236:280–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.Teversky A, Kahneman D. The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science. 1981;211:453–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 18.Mazier DJ. Why the goals of informed consent are not realized: on informed consent for the primary care physician. J Gen Intern Med. 1988;3:370–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar