Advertisement

Journal of Science Teacher Education

, Volume 4, Issue 2, pp 33–36 | Cite as

A learning cycle approach to dealing with pseudoscience beliefs of prospective elementary teachers

  • Dorothy B. Rosenthal
Article

Keywords

Science Teacher Knowledge Claim Learning Cycle Prospective Elementary Teacher Crop Circle 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abraham, M.R., & Renner, J.W. (1986). The sequence of learning cycle activities in high school chemistry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 23(2):121–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barman, C.R. (1987). Science, children, and learning. Indianapolis:Indiana University School of Education.Google Scholar
  3. Barman, C.R. (1989). A procedure for helping prospective elementary teachers integrate the learning cycle into science textbooks. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 1(2), 21–26.Google Scholar
  4. Barman, C.R. (1992, February). An evaluation of the use of a technique designed to assist prospective elementary teachers use the learning cycle with science textbooks. School Science and Mathematics, 92(2): 59–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cobern, W.W. (1990). Introducing teachers to the philosophy of science: The card exchange. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 2(2), 45–47.Google Scholar
  6. Danieley, H. (1990, May). Exploring mitosis through the learning cycle. The American Biology Teacher, 52(5): 295.Google Scholar
  7. Eve, R.A., & Dunn, D. (1990). Psychic powers, astrology & creationism in the classroom. The American Biology Teacher, 52(1), 10–21Google Scholar
  8. Furnham, A. (1991, January). Hooked on horoscopes. New Scientist, 33–36.Google Scholar
  9. Gallup, G. Jr. (1978). The Gallup Poll. Wilmington, DE: Scholarly ResourcesGoogle Scholar
  10. Gallup, G. Jr. (1982, August 29). The Gallup poll. The New York Times, p. 22.Google Scholar
  11. Gallup, G. Jr., & Newton, F. (1991). Belief in paranormal phenomena among adult Americans. Skeptical Inquirer, 15: 137–146.Google Scholar
  12. Gould, S. J. (1981). The mismeasure of man. New York, W.W. NortonGoogle Scholar
  13. Harrold, F., & Eve, R. (1987). Cult archaeology and creationism. Iowa: University of Iowa PressGoogle Scholar
  14. Kyle, W.C., Jr., & Abell, S. (1989). Enhancing prospective teachers’ conceptions of teaching and science. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 1(1), 10–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Marek, E. A., & Methven, S. B. (1991). Effects of the learning cycle upon student and classroom teacher performance. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28(1), 41–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Moore, R. (1992). Debunking the paranormal: We should teach critical thinking as a necessity for living, not just as a tool for science. The American Biology Teacher, 54(1), 4–9.Google Scholar
  17. Trefil, J. S. (1978). A consumer’s guide to pseudoscience. Saturday Review, 4(2), 16–21.Google Scholar
  18. Tuohy, W. (1991, September 10). “Crop circles” their prank, 2 Britons say. The Los Angeles Times, p. A-14.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© the Association for the Education of Teachers in Science (AETS) 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dorothy B. Rosenthal
    • 1
  1. 1.California State UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations