Science and Engineering Ethics

, Volume 1, Issue 1, pp 11–20

(Not) giving credit where credit is due: Citation of data sets

  • Joan E. Sieber
  • Bruce E. Trumbo
Article

Abstract

Adequate Citation of data sets is crucial to the encouragement of data sharing, to the integrity and cost-effectiveness of science and to easy access to the work of others. The citation behavior of social scientists who have published based on shared data was examined and found to be inconsistent with important ideals of science. Insights gained from the social sciences, where data sharing is somewhat customary, suggest policies and incentives that would foster adequate citation by secondary users, and greater openness and sharing in other disciplines.

Keywords

credit citation data set meta-analysis secondary analysis data sharing fraud editorial standards scientific integrity 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References and notes

  1. 1.
    Feinberg S E, Martin M E, Straf LM L, eds. (1985)Sharing Research Data. National Academy Press, Washington D C: 3–32.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sieber J E (1991) In: Sieber J E, ed.Sharing Social Science Data: Advantages and Challenges, Sage Publications, Newbury Park: 1–18, 141–150.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    See Bloch E (17 April 1989)Responsibilities of institutions and investigators in the conduct of research. National Science Foundation Notice No. 106, Washington D C.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    See Publication 10;Manual of the American Psychological Association, 3rd ed. (1983) American Psychological Association, Washington D C: 133.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    e.g., Stanley B and Stanley R (1988)Law and Human Behavior 12, 2: 173–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hedrick T E (1988)Law and Human Behavior 12, 2: 163–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Smith T W (18 June 1991) personal communicationGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Davis J A and Smith T W (1979)General Social Surveys, 1972–1979: Cumulative Codebook. National Opinion Research Center, Chicago.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chicago Manual of Style: For authors, editors and copywriters, 13th ed. (dy1982) University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Shields N E and Ahle M E (1985)Where Credit is Due: A Guide to Proper Citing of Sources—Print and Nonprint. Scarecrow Press, Metuchen, N J.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Dodd S (1979)Journal of the American Society for Information Science 30: 77–82;Google Scholar
  12. 11a.
    Dodd S (1982)Cataloguing machine-readable data files: An interpretive manual. American Library Association, Chicago.Google Scholar
  13. 12.
    Dodd S (1990)IASSIST Quarterly 14, 2: 14–17.Google Scholar
  14. 13.
    Smith T W and Krovitz S F (1988)Annotated Bibliography of Papers Using the General Social Surveys, 7th ed., National Opinion Research Center, Chicago.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    We thank Barbara Bailar, Patrick Bova, Sue Dodd, Jerry Clubb, Mark Frankel, Judith Rowe, Tom W. Smith and Conrad Taeuber for their comments on the manuscript. Support from a CSUH Research Award and from NSF grant DIR 9012185 (to JES) are gratefully acknowledge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Opragen Publications 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Joan E. Sieber
    • 1
  • Bruce E. Trumbo
    • 2
  1. 1.Dept. of PsychologyCalifornia State University, HaywardHaywardUSA
  2. 2.Department of StatisticsCalifornia State University HaywardHayward

Personalised recommendations