Racial harassment: Case characteristics and employer responsibilities

  • Edward J. Harrick
  • George M. Sullivan


This article examines the socio-business issue of racial harassment in the workplace. For two decades, the federal judiciary has been defining and refining the elements of the offense within the parameters of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and Section 1981 of the Civil Rights Act of 1866. The Supreme Court’s decision to hear arguments for the first and only time on one of the important aspects of the developing doctrine focused considerable attention on this workplace problem in 1989. The Civil Rights Act of 1991 provides limited money damages to victims of discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, whereas Section 1981 of the Civil Rights Act of 1866 provides unlimited damages to the victims of discrimination and race harassment. The authors discuss the legislative and judicial foundations of race harassment with respect toPatterson v. McLean, provide a profile and analysis of racial harassment cases (1971–1987), and conclude with a discussion of employer liability and recommendations for management.

Key words

racial harassment race harassment race discrimination civil rights hostile environment 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. A black and white issue for the FBI. (1988, July 18).U.S. News and World Report, 33–34.Google Scholar
  2. Bender, E. D. (1991). The viability of racist speech from high schools to universities: A welcome matriculation?Cincinnati Law Review, 59, 871–903.Google Scholar
  3. Brower, M. (1983). Racial harassment and violence shatter theDiff’rent Strokes world of actor Todd Bridge.People Weekly, 46, 49–50.Google Scholar
  4. Carmody, D. (1987, April 23). Columbia report cites racial unrest.New York Times, p. B2 (L.)Google Scholar
  5. Carter v. Duncan-Higgins, Ltd., 727 F.2d 1225 (D.C. Cir. 1984).Google Scholar
  6. Citchen v. Firestone Steel Products Co., Nos. 12190-EM, 15389-EM (Michigan Civil Rights Commission 1984).Google Scholar
  7. Compston v. Borden, Inc., 424 F. Supp. 157, 161 (S.D. Ohio 1967).Google Scholar
  8. Craig v. Y & Y Snacks, Inc., 721 F.2d 77, 80 (3rd Cir. 1983).Google Scholar
  9. Denis, M. K. (1984–1985). Racial harassment discrimination: A problem that won’t go away?Employee Relations Law Journal, 10, 415–436.Google Scholar
  10. Duncan, W. J., Smeltzer, L. R., & Leap, T. L. (1990). Humor and work: Applications of joking behavior to management.Journal of Management, 16(2), 269–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fekete v. U.S. Steel Corp., 353 F. Supp. 1177, 1186 (W.D. Pa. 1973).Google Scholar
  12. Fields, C. M. (1988, July 20). Colleges advised to develop strong procedures to deal with incidents of racial harassment,Chronicle of Higher Education, A11.Google Scholar
  13. Hines, W. W. (1982). When the boss calls you a....Black Enterprise, 12(8), 69–72.Google Scholar
  14. Hollon, C., & Bright, T. (1982). National origin harassment in the workplace: Recent guidelines and developments from the EEOC.Employee Relations Law Journal, 8, 282–291.Google Scholar
  15. Hunter v. Allis-Chalmers Corporation, 797 F.2d 1417 (7th Cir. 1986).Google Scholar
  16. Kittredge, C. (1992, October 24). N.H. city manager accused of sexist, racist comments.The Boston Globe, p. 28.Google Scholar
  17. Leap, T. L., & Smeltzer, L. R. (1984). Racial remarks in the workplace: Humor or harassment.Harvard Business Review, 62(6), 74–75, 78.Google Scholar
  18. Leap, T. L., & Smeltzer, L. R. (1988). An analysis of individual reactions to potentially offensive jokes in work settings.Human Relations, 41, 295–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. McClelland, K., & Hunter, C. (1992). The perceived seriousness of racial harassment.Social Problems, 39(1), 92–105.Google Scholar
  20. Mechling, E. W., & Mechling, J. (1985). Shock talk: From consensual to contractual joking relationships in the bureaucratic workplace.Human Organization, 44, 339–343.Google Scholar
  21. Moffett v. Gene B. Glick Company, 621 F. Supp., p. 244 (DC ND Indiana 1985).Google Scholar
  22. Patterson v. McLean Credit Union, 57 U.S.L.W. 4705 (1989).Google Scholar
  23. Racial harassment hits coast county. (1980, December 14).New York Times, Section 1, p. 35.Google Scholar
  24. Radcliffe-Brown, A. R. (1940). On joking relationships.Africa, 13, 195–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ramsey v. American Air Filter Company, 772 F.2d 1303 (7th Cir. 1985).Google Scholar
  26. Rogers v. EEOC, 454 F.2d 234 (5th Cir. 1971); cert. denied 406 U.S. 957 (1972).Google Scholar
  27. Snell v. Suffolk, 782 F.2d 1094 (2nd Cir. 1986).Google Scholar
  28. Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 United States Code 2000e-2(a)).Google Scholar
  29. Solomon, C. M. (1992). Keeping hate out of the workplace.Personnel Journal, 71, 30–35.Google Scholar
  30. Vance v. Southern Bell T & T Company, 672 F. Supp. 1408 (DC Florida 1987).Google Scholar
  31. Vaughn v. Pool Offshore Company, 683 F.2d 922 (5th Cir. 1982).Google Scholar
  32. Walker v. Ford Motor Company, 684 F.2d 1355 (11th Cir. 1982).Google Scholar
  33. Weiss, J. C., & Ephross, P. H. (1986). Group work approaches to “hate violence” incidents.Social Work, 31, 132–136.Google Scholar
  34. Winick, C. (1976). The social contexts of humor.Journal of Communication, 26(3), 124–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Edward J. Harrick
  • George M. Sullivan
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of ManagementSouthern Illinois University at EdwardsvilleEdwardsville

Personalised recommendations