Learning environment, learning styles and conceptual understanding
Abstract
In recent years there have been many studies on learners developing conceptions of natural phenomena. However, so far there have been few attempts to investigate how the characteristics of the learners and their environment influence such conceptions.
This study began with an attempt to use an instrument developed by McCarthy (1981) to describe learners in Malaysian primary schools. This proved inappropriate as Asian primary classrooms do not provide the same kind of environment as US classrooms. It was decided to develop a learning style checklist to suit the local context and which could be used to describe differences between learners which teachers could appreciate and use. The checklist included four dimensions — perceptual, process, self-confidence and motivation. The validated instrument was used to determine the learning style preferences of primary four pupils in Penang, Malaysia.
Later, an analysis was made regarding the influence of learning environment and learning styles on conceptual understanding in the topics of food, respiration and excretion. This study was replicated in the Philippines with the purpose of investigating the relationship between learning styles and achievement in science, where the topics of food, respiration and excretion have been taken up. A number of significant relationships were observed in these two studies.
Keywords
Learning Environment Conceptual Understanding Internal Consistency Reliability Learning Style Learning SituationPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- BIGGS, J. (1987).Student approaches to learning and studying. Melbourne, Australian Council for Educational Research.Google Scholar
- DUNN, R. & DUNN, K. (1979). Learning styles/teaching styles: Should they … can they be matched?Educational Leadership, 36, 238–244.Google Scholar
- DUNN, R., DUNN, K. & PRICE, G. (1987).Learning Style Inventory (An inventory for the identification of how individuals in grade 3 through 12 prefer to learn). Lawrence, Price Systems, Inc.Google Scholar
- FERRER, L.M., LEONG, Y.P. & LIAU, M.T.L. (1989).Teaching-Learning Project: Encounters with teaching-learning difficulties in primary 4 science and mathematics. Penang, Malaysia, Regional Centre for Education in Science and Mathematics.Google Scholar
- FERRER, L.M. & LEONG, Y.P. (1990).Teaching-Learning Project: Learning styles in science and mathematics. Penang, Malaysia, Regional Centre for Education in Science and Mathematics.Google Scholar
- McCARTHY, B. (1981).The 4 MAT system: Teaching to styles with right/left mode techniques. Illinois, Excel, Inc.Google Scholar
- OSBORNE, R. & GILBERT, J. (1980). A technique for exploring students’ views of the world.Physics Education, 50 (6), 376 - 379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- WHITE, R.T. (1988).Learning Science. Oxford, Basil Blackwell Ltd.Google Scholar