In Vitro

, Volume 13, Issue 12, pp 831–836 | Cite as

The in vitro propagation of amaryllis (Hippeastrum spp. Hybrids)

  • Janet E. A. Seabrook
  • Bruce G. Cumming


A new, rapid technique for the propagation of amaryllis (Hippeastrum spp. hybrids) by means of tissue culture is reported. Leaf bases, scapes, peduncles, inner bulb scales and ovaries were cultured successfully in vitro and plantlets were induced readily at various concentrations of growth regulators. Some plantlets also were produced in the absence of growth regulators. The most productive tissues for propagation were inverted scapes and peduncles, cultured in a modified Murashige and Skoog salt solution with added organic constituents and 1 mg per 1 (4.5μM) 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D) and 1 mg per 1 (4.4μM) 6-benzylaminopurine (BAP). Plantlets induced axenically also grew roots on the generalized shoot-inducing medium so that no special rooting medium was required. Although friable callus was obtained from ovary tissue cultured on a medium containing 2 mg per 1 (11μM) naphthaleneacetic acid and 4 mg per 1 (18μM) BAP, it produced shoots after 8 weeks of further subculture on the same medium. An average of 10 rooted plantlets was obtained from each scape or peduncle explant on the shoot-propagating medium. Thus, if 45 explants are obtained from each bulb, 450 rudimentary plantlets could be obtained from each mother bulb in 8 weeks of culture. This is a substantial increase over present propagation methods.

Key words

Hippeastrum (amaryllis) tissue culture propagation horticulture 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Burr, R. W. 1976. Mass propagation of ferns through tissue culture (abstr.). In Vitro 12: 309–310.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Makimo, R. K. 1976. Multiplication of house plants through tissue culture (abstr.). In Vitro 12: 310.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Matsuyama, K. M. 1976. Multiplication of landscape plants through tissue culture (abstr.). In Vitro 12: 310.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Seabrook, J. E. A., B. G. Cumming, and L. A. Dionne. 1976. The in vitro induction of adventitious shoot and root apices onNarcissus (daffodil and narcissus) cultivar tissue. Can. J. Bot. 54: 814–819.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ziv, M., A. H. Halevy, and R. Shilo. 1970. Organs and plantlet regeneration ofGladioulus through tissue culture. Ann. Bot. (London) 34: 671–675.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hildebrandt, A. C. 1971. Growth and differentiation of single plant cells and tissues. In:Les Cultures de Tissus de Plantes. Colloq. Int. C.N.R.S. 193: 71–93.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Davis, C. W. 1958. Vegetative propagation of Amaryllids. Plant Life (Herbatia Edition) 14: 81–83.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bell, W. D. 1973. The role of triploids inAmaryllis hybridization. Plant Life (Amaryllis Year Book) 29: 59–61.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Luyten, I. 1935. Vegetative propagation ofHippeastrums. Yearb. Am. Amaryllis Soc. (Herbatia). 2: 115–122.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Stewart, J. F. 1959. Vegetative propagation of hybrid amaryllis. Plant Life (Herbatia Edition) 15: 102–107.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Traub, H. P. 1935. Propagation of amaryllids by stem cuttage. Yearb. Amer. Amaryllis Soc. (Herbatia) 2: 123–126.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hussey, G. 1975. Totipotency in tissue explants and callus of some members of the Liliaceae, Iridaceae and Ameryllidaceae. J. Exp. Bot. 26: 253–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mii, M., T. Mori, and N. Iwase. 1974. Organ formation from the excised bulb scales ofHippeastrum hybridum in vitro. J. Hortic. Sci. 49: 241–244.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Murashige, T. 1974. Plant propagation through tissue cultures. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. 25: 135–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Oyamada, T. 1974. Propagation of amaryllis (Hippeastrum hybridum Hort.) by tissue culture: I. Effect of auxins and cytokinins on the callus formation and organ differentiation in the tissue culture of different parts of bulb scales. Sci. Rep. Fac. Agric. Meijo. Univ. 10: 10–19.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Yusof, I. B. M. 1972) Vegetative propagation of Amaryllis (Amaryllis GH Leopoldaeoides. Traub.). Ph.D. thesis, The Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, Baton Rouge, La.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bapat, V. A., and S. Narayanaswamy. 1976. Growth and organogenesis in explanted tissues ofAmaryllis in culture. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club. 103: 53–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Murashige, T., and F. Skoog. 1962. A revised medium for rapid growth and bio-assay with tobacco tissue culture. Physiol. Plant. 15: 473–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Murashige, T. 1976. Personal communication.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Fuganti, C. 1975. The Amaryllidaceae alkaloids. In: R. F. Manske, and H. L. Holmes (Eds.),The Alkaloids. Vol. XV. Academic Press, New York, pp. 83–164.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Furusawa, E., S. Furusawa, S. Morimoto, and W. Cutting. 1971. Therapeutic activity ofNarcissus alkaloid on Rauscher Leukemia and comparison with standard drugs (35452). Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med. 136: 1168–1173.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Constabel, F. 1976. Personal communication.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Cerioti, G. 1967. Narciclasine: an antimitotic substance fromNarcissus bulbs. Nature 213: 595–596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Nowicki, M. E., and E. N. O'Rourke, Jr.. 1974. On the elimination of amaryllis mosaic virus from Leopoldii amaryllis hybrids: Part I. Shoot-apex culture. Plant Life 30: 108–113.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Tissue Culture Association 1977

Authors and Affiliations

  • Janet E. A. Seabrook
    • 1
  • Bruce G. Cumming
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of BiologyUniversity of New BrunswickFrederictonCanada

Personalised recommendations