Advertisement

Current Microbiology

, Volume 4, Issue 5, pp 317–320 | Cite as

Pseudomonas siderophores: A mechanism explaining disease-suppressive soils

  • Joseph W. Kloepper
  • John Leong
  • Martin Teintze
  • Milton N. Schroth
Article

Abstract

The addition of either fluorescentPseudomonas strain B10, isolated from a take-all suppressive soil, or its siderophore, pseudobactin, to bothFusarium-wilt and take-all conducive soils inoculated withFusarium oxysporum f. sp.lini orGaeumannomyces graminis var.tritici, respectively, rendered them disease suppressive. Our findings suggest that disease suppressiveness is caused in part by microbial siderophores which efficiently complex iron(III) in soils, making it unavailable to pathogens, thus inhibiting their growth. Amendment of exogenous iron(III) to disease-suppressive soils converted them to conductive soils presumably by repressing siderophore production.

Keywords

Barley Seed Current Microbiology Flax Seed Conducive Soil Suppressive Soil 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. 1.
    Alabouvette, C., Rousel, F., Louvet, J. 1979. Characteristics ofFusarium wilt: Suppressive soils and prospects for their utilization in biological control, pp. 165–182. In: Schippers, B., Gams, W. (eds.), Soil-borne plant pathogens. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Burr, T. J., Schroth, M. N., Suslow, T. 1978. Increased potato yields by treatment of seedpieces with specific strains ofPseudomonas fluorescens andP. putida. Phytopathology68:1377–1383.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cook, R. J., Rovira, A. D. 1976. The role of bacteria in the biological control ofGaeumannomyces graminis by suppressive soils. Soil Biology and Biochemistry8:269–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hornby, D. 1979. Take-all decline: A theorist’s paradise, pp. 133–156. In: Schippers, B., Gams, W. (eds.), Soil-borne plant pathogens. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    King, E. O., Ward, M. K., Raney, D. E. 1954. Two simple media for the demonstration of pyocyanin and fluorescin. Journal of Laboratory and Clinical Medicine44:301–307.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kloepper, J. W., Leong, J., Teintze, M., Schroth, M. N. 1980. Enhanced plant growth by siderophores produced by plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria. Nature, in press.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kloepper, J. W., Schroth, M. N. 1980. Potato rhizosphere colonization by plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria increases plant development and yield. Phytopathology, in press.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    McCain, A. H., Pyeatt, L. E., Byrne, T. G., Farnham, D. S. 1980. Suppressive soil reduces carnation disease. California Agriculture34:9.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Neilands, J. B. 1980. Microbial metabolism of iron. In: Jacobs, A., Worwood, M. (eds.), Iron in biochemistry and medicine. New York: Academic Press. In press.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Scher, F. M., Baker, R. 1980. Mechanism of biological control in aFusarium-suppressive soil. Phytopathology70:412–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Smiley, R. W. 1978. Antagonists ofGaeumannomyces graminis from the rhizoplane of wheat in soils fertilized with ammonium-or nitrate-nitrogen. Soil Biology and Biochemistry10:169–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Smiley, R. W. 1979. Wheat-rhizoplane pseudomonads as antagonists ofGaeumannomyces graminis. Soil Biology and Biochemistry11:371–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Suslow, T. V., Kloepper, J. W., Schroth, M. N., Burr, T. J. 1979. Beneficial bacteria enhance plant growth. California Agriculture33:15–17.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York Inc 1980

Authors and Affiliations

  • Joseph W. Kloepper
    • 1
  • John Leong
    • 2
  • Martin Teintze
    • 2
  • Milton N. Schroth
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Plant PathologyUniversity of CaliforniaBerkeleyUSA
  2. 2.Department of ChemistryUniversity of California, San DiegoLa JollaUSA

Personalised recommendations