Journal of General Internal Medicine

, Volume 5, Issue 1, pp 42–45 | Cite as

Measurement and improvement of humanistic skills in first-year trainees

  • Howard Beckman
  • Richard Frankel
  • John Kihm
  • Gregory Kulesza
  • Michael Geheb
Original Articles

Abstract

The American Board of Internal Medicine (ABIM) has recently emphasized the development of bumanistic skills in trainees. Using video technology, transition outpatient visits of first-year bouse officers in a primary care training program were evaluated for the presence or absence of nine bumanistic skills before and after the initiation of an instructional program to reinforce the skills. Thirteen videotaped PGY-1 encounters constituted the preintervention group and 16 videotaped PGY-1 encounters constituted the postintervention group. The preintervention group performed a mean of 1.38 skills while the postintervention group performed a mean of 3.56 skills, a statistically significant improvement (p<0.05). The authors conclude that an educational approach that focuses on specific elements of interactions facilitates the incorporation of skills associated with bumane medical care

Key words

bumanism medical education skill modification medical practice 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    American Board of Internal Medicine, Subcommittee on Evaluation of Humanistic Qualities of the Internist, Evaluation of humanistic qualities in the internist. Ann Intern Med. 1983;99:720–4.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Linn LS, Oye RK, Cope DW, DiMatteo MR. Use of non-physician staff to evaluate humanistic behavior internal medicine residents and faculty members. J Med Educ. 1986;61:918–20.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cope DW, Linn LS, Leake BD, Barrett PA. Modification of residents’ behavior by preceptor feedback of patient satisfaction. J Gen Intern Med. 1986;1:394–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Jarski RW, Gjerde CL, Bratton BD, Brown DD, Mathes SS. A comparison of your empathy instruments in simulated patient-medical student interactions. J Med Educ. 1985;60:545–51.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Linn LS, DiMatteo MR, Cope DW, Robbins A. Measuring physicians’ humanistic attitudes, values, and behaviors. Med Care. 1987;25:504–15.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Beckman HB, Frankel RM. “Hello, I’m your new doctor.” JAMA. 1986;256:1446.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Inui T, Carter W. Humanistic behavior of physicians as rated by patients. Presented at the Association for Health Services Research, San Francisco, California, June 28, 1988.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Frankel RM, Beckman HB. IMPACT. An interaction-based method for analyzing and preserving clinical transactions. In: Pettegrew LS, ed. Explorations in provider and patient interactions. Nashville, TN: Humana Inc., 1982;71–85.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of General Internal Medicine 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • Howard Beckman
    • 1
  • Richard Frankel
    • 1
  • John Kihm
    • 3
  • Gregory Kulesza
    • 1
  • Michael Geheb
    • 2
  1. 1.the Division of General Internal MedicineWayne State University School of MedicineDetroit
  2. 2.the Department of MedicineWayne State University School of MedicineDetroit
  3. 3.the Division of General Internal MedicineDuke UniversityDurham

Personalised recommendations