Journal of General Internal Medicine

, Volume 5, Issue 1, pp 29–33 | Cite as

Patients’ perceived involvement in care scale:

Relationship to attitudes about illness and medical care
  • Caryn E. Lerman
  • David S. Brody
  • G. Craig Caputo
  • David G. Smith
  • Carlos G. Lazaro
  • Heidi G. Wolfson
Original Articles

Abstract

This report describes the development of the Perceived Involvement in Care Scale (PICS), a self-report questionnaire for patients, and its relation to primary care patients’ attitudes regarding their illnesses and the management of them. The questionnaire was administered to three independent samples of adult primary care patients. Patients’ satisfaction and their attitudes regarding their illnesses are evaluated after their medical visits. This instrument is designed to examine three relatively distinct factors: 1) doctor facilitation of patient involvement, 2) level of information exchange, and 3) patient participation in decision making. Of these factors, doctor facilitation and patient decision making were related significantly to patients’ satisfaction with care. Doctor facilitation and information exchange related consistently to patients’ perceptions of post-visit changes in their understanding, reassurance, perceived control over illness, and expectations for improvement in functioning. The role of physicians in enhancing patient involvement in care and the potential therapeutic benefits of physician facilitative behavior are addressed.

Key words

patient role clinical decision making doctor-patient communication doctor-patient relationship patient satisfaction 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Barsky AJ III. Patient heal thyself: activating the ambulatory medical patient. J Chron Dis. 1976;29:585–97.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Haug MR, Lavin B. Public challenge of physician authority. Med Care. 1979;17:844–58.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Brody DS. The patient’s role in clinical decision-making. Ann Intern Med. 1980;93:718–22.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Siegler M. Searching for moral certainty in medicine: a proposal for a new model of the doctor—patient encounter. Bull N Y Acad Med. 1981;57:56–69.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Brody DS, Miller SM, Lerman CE, Blum MJ, Smith DG. Patient perception of involvement in medical care: relationship to illness attitudes and outcomes. J Gen Intern Med. 1988;4:506–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Schulman AB. Active patient orientation and outcomes in hypertensive treatment. Med Care. 1979;17:267–80.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Roter DL. Patient participation in the patient provider interaction: the effects of patient question asking on the quality of interaction, satisfaction and compliance. Health Educ Monographs 1977; Winter:281–315.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Greenfield S, Kaplan S, Ware JE. Expanding patient involvement in care. Ann Intern Med. 1985;102:520–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Greenfield S, Kaplan SH, Ware JE Jr., Yano EM, Frank HJL. Patients’ participation in medical care. J Gen Intern Med. 1988;3:448–57.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lazare A, Eisenthal S, Wasserman L. The customer approach to patienthood: attending to patient requests in a walk-in clinic.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Slack WV. The patient’s right to decide. Lancet. 1977;2:240.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Fiore N. Fighting cancer—one patient’s perspective. N Engl J Med. 1979;300:284–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Korsch BM, Gozzi EK, Francis V. Gaps in doctor—patient communication: doctor—patient interaction and satisfaction. Pediatrics. 1968;42:855–71.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Svarstad B. Physician-patient communication and patient conformity with medical advice. In: Mechanic D. The growth of bureaucratic medicine. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1976.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hayes-Bautista DE. Modifying the treatment: patient compliance, patient control and medical care. Soc Sci Med. 1976;10:223–38.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Langer EJ, Janis IL, Wolfer JA. Reduction of psychological stress in surgical patients. J Exp Soc Psychol. 1975;11:155–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Langer EJ, Rodin J. The effects of choice and enhanced personal responsibility for the aged: a field experiment in an institutional setting. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1976;34:191–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bowers KS. Pain, anxiety and perceived control. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1968;32:596–602.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Pennebaker JW, Burnam A, Schaeffer MA, Harper DC. Lack of control as a determinant of perceived physical symptoms. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1977;35:167–74.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Taylor SE. Adjustment to threatening events: a theory of cognitive adaptation. Am Psychol. 1983; Nov:1161–72.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Seeman M, Seeman T. Health behavior and personal autonomy: a longitudinal study of the sense of control in illness. J Health Soc Behav. 1983;24:144–60.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Brody DS, Miller SM. Illness concerns and recovery from URI. Med Care. 1986;24:742–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ware JE, Snyder MK, Wright WR. Development and validation of scales to measure patient satisfaction with health care services. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, 1976.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Brody DS, Miller SM, Lerman CE, Smith DG, Lazaro CG, Blum MJ. The relationship between patients’ satisfaction with their physicians and perceptions about interventions they desired and received. Med Care, in press.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Friedson E. Professional dominance. Chicago:Adline, 1970.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Wasserman RC, Inui TS, Barriatua BS, Carter WB, Lippincott P. Pediatric clinicians’ support for parents makes a difference: an outcome-based analysis of clinician-parent interaction. Pediatrics. 1984;74:1047–53.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Eisenthal S, Lazare A. Evaluation of the initial interview in a walk-in clinic: the patient’s perspective on a “customer approach”. J Nerv Ment Dis. 1976;162:169–76.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Eisenthal S, Emery R, Lazare A, Udin H. “Adherence” and the negotiated approach to patienthood. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1979;36:393–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of General Internal Medicine 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • Caryn E. Lerman
    • 1
  • David S. Brody
    • 2
  • G. Craig Caputo
    • 2
  • David G. Smith
    • 2
  • Carlos G. Lazaro
    • 3
  • Heidi G. Wolfson
    • 2
  1. 1.the Fox Chase Cancer Center, Division of CancerUSA
  2. 2.Temple University School of MedicinePhiladelphia
  3. 3.the University of Southern CaliforniaLos Angeles

Personalised recommendations