Adding spirometry, carbon monoxide, and pulmonary symptom results to smoking cessation counseling
- 105 Downloads
Smokers are often advised to quit in a discussion of future health risks. The authors tested whether adding information about personal effects of smoking would motivate hospital outpatients to stop smoking more than advice about potential hazards would. Ninety smokers in a general screening clinic were randomized to receive education alone or education plus an additional motivational intervention that contained immediate feedback about the smoker’s exhaled carbon monoxide (CO) values, spirometry results, and pulmonary symptoms. A self-report of smoking status was obtained one, four, and 12 months after the intervention. In addition, at 12 months, exhaled CO measurements were made. Smokers who received the additional motivational intervention were more than twice as likely to report quitting some time during the 12-month follow-up (40% vs. 16%, p=0.015). At 12 months, 33% of the intervention group and 10% of the control group smokers tested had achieved Co-validated cessation (p=0.03). Counting all patients not contacted as continuing to smoke, the percentages were 20% vs. 7% (p=0.06). These practical feedback methods to motivate cessation deserve testing in other settings.
Key wordsspirometry carbon monoxide smoking therapy smoking psychology
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Schwartz JL. Review and evaluation of smoking cessation methods: the United States and Canada, 1978–1985. Washington DC: Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, National Cancer Institute, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 1987; NIH Publication no. 87–2940.Google Scholar
- 10.Altman DG, King AC. Approaches to compliance in primary prevention. J Compl Health Care. 1986;1:55–73.Google Scholar
- 12.Pettry TL, Cherniack RM. Let’s identify COPD early! Clin Notes Respir Dis. 1982;21:8–9.Google Scholar
- 14.Morris JF, Sturman W. Spirometry and respiratory questionnaire: value for screening and smoking cessation. (abstract) Am Rev Respir Dis. 1974;109:702.Google Scholar
- 22.Jamrozik K, Vessey M, Fowler G, Wald N, Parker G, Van Vunakis H. Controlled trial of three different antismoking interventions in general practice. Br Med J. 1984;288:1499–1503.Google Scholar
- 23.Belcher DW, Inui TS, Carter WB. Disease prevention and health maintenance program trial: HSR & D project IIR#81–619 final report. Seattle, WA: Northwest Health Services Research and Development Field Program, Veterans Administration Medical Center, 1987.Google Scholar
- 24.American Lung Association. Freedom from smoking in 20 days: self-help quit smoking program. New York: American Lung Association, 1980.Google Scholar
- 27.Fletcher C, Peto R, Tinker C, Speizer FE. The natural history of chronic bronchitis and emphysema: an eight-year study of early chronic obstructive lung disease in working men in London. New York: Oxford University Press, 1976.Google Scholar
- 28.Medical Research Council Committee on the Aetiology of Chronic Bronchitis. Standardized questionaires on respiratory symptoms. Br Med J. 1960;2:1665.Google Scholar
- 29.Marascuilo LA: Statistical methods for behavior science research. New York: McGraw Hill, 1971.Google Scholar
- 37.Marlatt GA, Gordon J. Relapse prevention. New York: Guilford Press, 1985.Google Scholar