Advertisement

Journal of General Internal Medicine

, Volume 5, Issue 6, pp 490–494 | Cite as

The use of formal prior directives among patients with HIV-related diseases

  • Joan Teno
  • John Fleishman
  • Dan W. Brock
  • Vincent Mor
Original Articles

Abstract

Objective:To examine the knowledge of, counseling about, and use of prior directives among patients with HIV-related disease.

Design:Cross-sectional survey with personal interviews that was part of the evaluation of a multi-site AIDS Health Services Program.

Setting:Outpatient clinics and AIDS community-based organizations.

Patients/participants:To be eligible for the survey, subjects had to be at least 18 years of age and enrolled in the AIDS Health Services Program for at least one month. 1,031 clients were interviewed in nine communities.

Measurements and main results:Of those surveyed, 61% had thought a moderate or great amount about naming a proxy for health care decisions. The majority (68%) of the patients knew about prior directives, yet only 35% had been counseled and only 28% had a prior directive. Of those counseled, physicians had counseled only 11% (38/359). Gay/bisexual men were more likely to have been counseled and to have executed a prior directive than were others. Counseling was associated with having obtained a prior directive. Counseled subjects were 3.5 times more likely to have obtained a prior directive than were those not counseled.

Conclusions:A gap exists between subjects’ knowledge and implementation of prior directives. To help bridge this gap, the authors recommend that physicians not only attend to the technical aspects of patient care, but also determine patient values concerning life-sustaining therapy and counsel patients on prior directives.

Key words

advance directives prior directives AIDS HIV living wills durable power of attorney 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    President’s Commision for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research. Deciding to forego life-sustaining treatment. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1983.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Guidelines on the termination of life-sustaining treatment and the care of the dying. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 1987.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Jonsen AR, Siegler M, Winslade WS. Clinical ethics: a practical approach to ethical decisions in clinical medicine. New York: Macmillan Publishing Co, 1982.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lo B, Steinbrook RL. Deciding whether to resuscitate. Arch Intern Med. 1983;143:1561–3.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bedell SE, Pelle D, Maher PL, et al. Do-not-resuscitate orders for critically ill patients in the hospital: how are they used and what is their impact? JAMA. 1986;256:232–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Schneiderman LJ, Arras JD. Counseling patients to counsel physician on future care in the event of patient incompetence. Ann Intern Med. 1985;102:693–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Steinbrook R, Lo B. Decision making for incompetent patients by designated proxy: California’s new law. N Engl J Med. 1984;319:1598–1601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lo B, McLeod GA, Saika G. Patient attitudes to discussing life-sustaining treatment. Arch Intern Med. 1986;146:1613–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Schmerling RH, Bedell SE, Lilienfeld A, et al. Discussing cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a study of elderly outpatients. J Gen Intern Med. 1988;3:317–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Steinbrook R, Lo B, Moulton J, et al. Preferences of homosexual men with AIDS for life-sustaining treatment. N Engl J Med. 1986;314:457–60.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Finucane TE, Shumway JM, Powers RI, et al. Planning with elderly outpatients for contingencies of severe illness: a survey and clinical trial. J Gen Intern Med. 1988;3:322–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Steiber SR. Social issues: right to die: public balks at deciding for others. Hospitals. 1987;61:72.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mor V, Piette J, Fleishman J. Challenges to community case management of persons with AIDS. Health Aff. 1989; Winter: 139–53.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Fleishman JA, Piete JD, Mor V. Organizational response to AIDS. Evaluation and Program Plann. 1990;13:31–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Fleishman J, Cwi JS, Mor V. Sampling and accessing people with AIDS: a study of program clients in nine locales. Proceedings of the Fifth Conference of Health Survey Research Methods. Keystone, CO: May, 1989.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Nagi SZ. An epidemiology of disability among adults in the United States. Milbank Q. 1976;54(4):439–67.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kleinbaum DG, Kupper LL, Morganstein H. Epidemiologic research: principles and quantitative Methods. Belmont, CA: Lifetime Learning Publications, 1982.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    SPSS-X User’s Guide. 3-rd ed. Chicago: SPSS Inc., 1988.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Davidson KW, Hackler C, Caradine DR, McCord RS. Physicians’ attitudes on advance directives. JAMA. 1989;262:2415–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Klutch M. Survey results after one year’s experience with the Natural Death Act. West J Med. 1978;128:329–30.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Emanuel LL, Emanuel EJ. The medical directive: a new comprehensive advance care document. JAMA. 1989;261:3288–93.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Eisendrath SJ, Jonsen AR. The living will: help or hindrance. JAMA. 1983;249:2054–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Buchanan AE, Brock DW. Deciding for others: the ethics of surrogate decision making. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Wanzer SH, Federmann DD, Adelstein SJ, et al. The physician’s responsibility toward hopelessly ill patients: a second look. N Engl J Med. 1989;320:844–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of General Internal Medicine 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • Joan Teno
    • 1
  • John Fleishman
    • 1
  • Dan W. Brock
    • 2
  • Vincent Mor
    • 1
  1. 1.the Center for Gerontology and Health Care ResearchBrown University Program in MedicineProvidence
  2. 2.the Department of PhilosophyBrown University Program in MedicineProvidence

Personalised recommendations