Implementation of cancer prevention guidelines in clinical practice

  • Stephen J. McPhee
  • Joyce Adair Bird
Diffusion Of Task Force Recommendations

Abstract

Data from several sources, including consumer surveys, physician surveys, and medical record audits, indicate that consumers do not receive cancer screening tests as recommended by the National Cancer Institute, the American Cancer Society, and the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Performance rates are consistently below published standards for all tests except Pap tests. Major reasons physicians do not perform the recommended tests include physician forgetfulness, disagreement with recommendations, lack of time, and patient refusal. Physicians also tend to overestimate their own performance rates. Barriers to screening test performance can be categorized into patient factors, physician factors, test factors, and health care delivery system factors. Interventions, such as computerized reminder systems, physician audits with feedback, and patient education and reminders, can be effective in promoting performance of such screening. Interventions that target both physician and patient may be particularly effective.

Key words

cancer mass screening reminder systems barriers physician practice patterns 

References

  1. 1.
    American Cancer Society. Cancer statistics, 1988. CA. 1988;38:5–22.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Tabar L, Fagerberg CJG, Gad A, et al. Reduction in mortality from breast cancer after mass screening with mammography: randomized trial from the Breast Cancer Screening Working Group of the Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare. Lancet. 1985;1:829–32.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    McPhee SJ, Jenkins CN, Bird JA. Screening for colorectal cancer: an annotated bibliography for clinicians and educators. J Cancer Educ. Part I. 1987;2:35–49; and Part II. 1987;2:113–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Knight KK, Fielding JE, Battista RN. Occult blood screening for colorectal cancer. JAMA. 1989;261:586–93.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Laara E, Day NE, Hakama M. Trends in mortality from cervical cancer in the Nordic countries: association with organised screening programmes. Lancet. 1987 (May 30):1247–9.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Guide to Clinical Preventive Services. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins, 1989.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    National Cancer Institute. Working guidelines for early cancer detection: rationale and supporting evidence to decrease mortality. Bethesda, MD: Early Detection Branch, Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, National Cancer Institute, 1987.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    American Cancer Society. Summary of current guidelines for the cancer-related check-up: recommendations. New York: ACS, 1988.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    National Center for Health Statistics and National Cancer Institute. Provisional estimates from the National Health Interview Survey Supplement on Cancer Control—United States—January–March, 1987. MMWR. 1988;37:417–25.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    McPhee SJ, Richard RJ, Solkowitz SN. Performance of cancer screening in a university general internal medicine practice: comparison with the 1980 American Cancer Society guidelines. J Gen Intern Med. 1986;1:275–81.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Battista RN. Adult cancer prevention in primary care: patterns of practice in Quebec. Am J Public Health. 1983;73:1036–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    American Cancer Society. Survey of physicians’ attitudes and practices in early cancer detection. CA. 1985;35:197–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Romm FJ, Fletcher SW, Hulka BS. The periodic health examination: comparison of recommendations and internists’ performance. South Med J. 1981;74:265–71.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Woo B, Woo B, Cook EF, et al. Screening procedures in the asymptomatic adult. Comparison of physicians’ recommendations, patients’ desires, published guidelines, and actual practice. JAMA. 1985;254:1480–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lewis CE. Disease prevention and health promotion practices of primary care physicians in the United States. Am J Prev Med. 1988;4(4):s9–16.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Makuc DM, Freid VM, Kleinman JC. National trends in the use of preventive care by women. Am J Public Health. 1989;79:21–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gemson DH, Elinson J. Prevention in primary care: variability in physician practice patterns in New York City. Am J Prev Med. 1986;2:226–34.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gemson DH, Elinson J, Messeri P. Differences in physician prevention practice patterns for white and minority patients. J Community Health. 1988;13(1):53–64.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Burack RC, Liang J. The early detection of cancer in the primary care setting: factors associated with the acceptance and completion of recommended procedures. Prev Med. 1987;16:739–51.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lurie N, Manning WG, Peterson C, et al. Preventive care: do we practice what we preach? Am J Public Health. 1987;77:801–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Woolhandler S, Himmelstein DU. Reverse targeting of preventive care due to lack of health insurance. JAMA. 1988;259:2872–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Orlandi MA. Promoting health and preventing disease in health care settings: an analysis of the barriers. Prev Med. 1987;16:119–30.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Green LW, Eriksen MP, Schor EL. Preventive practices by physicians: behavioral determinants and potential interventions. Am J Prev Med. 1988;4(4):s101–7.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Sickles EA, Weber WN, Galvin HB, Ominsky SH, Sollitto RA. Mammographic screening: how to operate successfully at low cost. Radiology. 1986;160:95–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    McPhee SJ, Bird JA, Jenkins CN, Fordham D. Promoting cancer screening: a randomized, controlled trial of three strategies. Arch Intern Med. 1989;149:1866–72.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© the Society of General Internal Medicine 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stephen J. McPhee
    • 1
    • 2
  • Joyce Adair Bird
    • 1
  1. 1.the Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of MedicineUniversity of California, San FranciscoSan Francisco
  2. 2.the Institute for Health Policy StudiesUniversity of California, San FranciscoSan Francisco

Personalised recommendations