Journal of General Internal Medicine

, Volume 9, Issue 11, pp 622–626 | Cite as

Long-term effects of ethics education on the quality of care for patients who have do-not-resuscitate orders

  • Daniel P. Sulmasy
  • Peter B. Terry
  • Ruth R. Faden
  • David M. Levine
Original Articles


Objective: To assess the long-term clinical impact of a broad-based ethics education program for medical houseofficers with specific emphasis on appropriate care for patients who have do-not-resuscitate (DNR) orders.

Design: Prospective, with an initial randomized phase.

Setting: The medical service of a university teaching hospital.

Participants: Medical houseofficers and their inpatients.

Interventions: A pilot program in 1988, and a full program with a two-year curricular cycle from 1989 to 1991.

Measurements and main results: The authors measured compliance with specific standards of care by reviewing charts of patients who had DNR orders at baseline (n=39, 1988), after the pilot phase (n=57, 1989), and at the end of the first curricular cycle (n=56, 1991), noticing who wrote the DNR order, whether the reasons for the order and appropriate consent were documented, and whether there was documented attention to any of 11 concurrent care concerns (CCCs), such as spiritual needs, the appropriateness of tube feedings or pressors, and adjustment of analgesic dose. The percentage of DNR orders written by houseofficers increased from 26% in 1988 to 67% in 1991 (p<0.01). The percentage of charts documenting the rationale and consent for the DNR order was consistently high. The percentage of charts documenting attention to any CCC increased from 68% in 1988 to 86% in 1991 (p<0.01). The mean number of CCCs addressed per DNR order increased from 1.34 in 1988 to 2.14 in 1991. The mean number of CCCs addressed per DNR order for patients who had AIDS increased from 0.89 in 1988 to 2.25 in 1991 (p=0.03).

Conclusions: The quality of care for patients who had DNR orders, both overall and for those who had AIDS, improved over long-term observation in the setting of an ethics education program for medical houseofficers. The results suggest that ethics education may alter physician practices and improve patient care.

Key words

medical ethics medical education internship and residency resuscitation quality of care do-not-resuscitate orders 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    The Hastings Center Project on the Termination of Treatment and Care of the Dying. Guidelines of the termination of life-sustaining treatment and the care of the dying. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 1987;48–51.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Youngner S. Do not resuscitate orders: no longer a secret but still a problem. Hastings Cent Rep. 1987;17:24–33.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Buchanan S, Cvach M, Dans P, et al. Implementation of DNR orders in the Department of Medicine, the Johns Hopkins Hospital. Maryland Med J. 1988;37:461–4.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sulmasy DP, Geller G, Levine DM, Faden R. Medical houseofficers’ knowledge, attitudes, and confidence regarding medical ethics. Arch Intern Med. 1990;150:2509–13.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sulmasy DP, Geller G, Faden R, Levine DM. The quality of mercy: caring for patients with ‘do not resuscitate’ orders. JAMA. 1992;267:682–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Knaus WA, Draper EA, Wagner DP, Zimerman JE. APACHE II: a severity of disease classification system. Crit Care Med. 1985;13:818–29.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cruzan v. Harmon. 760 S. W. 2d 408.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Omnibus Reconciliation Act 1990. Title IV. Section 4206. Washington, DC: Congressional Record, October 26, 1990;12638.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    La Puma J, Silverstein M, Stocking CB, Roland D, Siegler M. Life-sustaining treatment: a prospective study of patients with DNR orders in a teaching hospital. Arch Intern Med. 1988;148:2193–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lo B, Steinbrook R. Beyond the Cruzan case: the U.S. Supreme Court and medical practice. Ann Intern Med. 1991;114:895–901.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    O’Toole EE, Youngner SJ, Juknialis BW, Daly B, Bartlett, ET, Landefeld CS. Evaluation of a treatment limitation policy with a specific treatment-limiting order page. Arch Intern Med. 1994;154:425–32.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mittleberger JA, Lo B, Martin D, Uhlmann RF. Impact of a procedure-specific do not resuscitate order form on documentation of do not resuscitate orders. Arch Intern Med. 1993;153:228–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of General Internal Medicine 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Daniel P. Sulmasy
    • 1
  • Peter B. Terry
    • 2
  • Ruth R. Faden
    • 2
  • David M. Levine
    • 2
  1. 1.the Division of General Internal Medicine and the Center for Clinical BioethicsGeorgetown University Medical CenterWashington, DC
  2. 2.the Johns Hopkins Medical InstitutionsBaltimore

Personalised recommendations