Journal of General Internal Medicine

, Volume 8, Issue 1, pp 23–28 | Cite as

The ethics objective structured clinical examination

  • Peter A. Singer
  • Robert Cohen
  • Anja Robb
  • Arthur Rothman
Original Articles

Abstract

Objective: To develop objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) stations to assess the ability of physicians to address selected clinical-ethical situations, and to evaluate inter-rater agreement in these stations.

Design: Two ten-minute OSCE stations were developed using videotaped encounters between attending physicians and standardized patients. One scenario involved a daughter requesting a do-not-resuscitate (DNR) order for her competent mother without the mother’s knowledge; the other involved a competent elderly woman requesting not to be re-intubated if her congestive heart failure worsened. The scenarios were evaluated using foreign medical graduates taking an OSCE. Each candidate was scored on his or her interaction with a standardized patient in the two OSCE stations by two independent observers.

Participants: Eight attending physicians from the Division of General Internal Medicine at the Toronto Hospital were used to develop the OSCE stations, and 69 foreign medical graduates taking the University of Toronto Pre-Internship Program OSCE were used to evaluate the stations.

Results: The inter-rater reliability coefficients for the DNR and intubation scenarios were 0.79 (95% CI 0.69–0.87) and 0.75 (95% CI 0.62–0.84), respectively. For the DNR station, the scores of the two examiners, on a scale of 0 to 10, agreed exactly for 34 candidates (50%), within one mark for 59 candidates (87%), and within two marks for 65 candidates (96%). For the intubation station, the scores of the two examiners agreed exactly for 27 candidates (40%), within one mark for 56 candidates (84%), and within two marks for 63 candidates (94%).

Conclusions: The authors produced ethics OSCE stations with face and content validity and satisfactory inter-rater agreement. Ethics OSCE stations may be suitable for evaluating the ability of medical students and residents to address selected clinical-ethical situations.

Key words

objective structured clinical examination ethics performance evaluation students residents inter-rater agreement 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Scott CS, Barrows HS, Brock DM, Hunt DD. Clinical behaviors and skills that faculty from 12 institutions judged were essential for medical students to acquire. Acad Med. 1991;66:106–11.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Miles SH, Lane LW, Bickel J, Walker RM, Cassel CK. Medical ethics education: coming of age. Acad Med. 1989;64:705–14.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Baylis F, Downie J. Undergraduate medical ethics education: a survey of Canadian medical schools. London, Ontario, Canada: Westminster Institute, 1990.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Subcommittee on Evaluation of Humanistic Qualities in the Internist, American Board of Internal Medicine. Evaluation of humanistic qualities in the internist. Ann Intern Med. 1983;99:720–4.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Biomedical Ethics Committee approves document on postgraduate teaching of biomedical ethics. Ann R Coll Physicians Surg Can. 1989;22:560.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Pellegrino ED. Teaching medical ethics: some persistent questions and some responses. Acad Med. 1989;64:701–3.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Pellegrino ED, Siegler M, Singer PA. Teaching clinical ethics. J Clin Ethics. 1990;1:175–80.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Howe KR, Jones MS. Techniques for evaluating student performance in a preclinical medical ethics course. J Med Educ. 1984;59:350–2.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Siegler M, Rezler AG, Connell KJ. Using simulated case studies to evaluate a clinical ethics course for junior students. J Med Educ. 1982;57:380–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Doyal L, Hurwitz B, Yudkin JS. Teaching medical ethics symposium: medical ethics and the clinical curriculum: a case study. J Med Ethics. 1987;13:144–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Redmon RB. A medical ethics project for third-year medical students. Acad Med. 1989;64:266–70.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hebert P, Meslin EM, Dunn EV, Byrne N, Reid SR. Evaluating ethical sensitivity in medical students: using vignettes as an instrument. J Med Ethics. 1990;16:141–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Miles SH, Bannick-Mohrland S, Lurie N. Advance-treatment planning discussions with nursing home residents: pilot experience with simulated interviews. J Clin Ethics. 1990;2:108–12.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gordon GE, Tolle SW. Discussing life-sustaining treatment: a teaching program for residents. Arch Intern Med. 1991;151:567–70.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Self DJ, Wolinsky FD, Baldwin DC. The effect of teaching medical ethics on medical students’ moral reasoning. Acad Med. 1989;64:755–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Harden RM, Gleeson FA. Assessment of clinical competence using an objective structured clinical examination OSCE. Med Educ. 1979;13:41–54.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Stillman P, Swanson D, Regan MB, et al. Assessment of clinical skills of residents utilizing standardized patients: a follow-up study and recommendations for application. Ann Intern Med. 1991;114:393–401.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Cohen R, Singer PA, Rothman AI, Robb A. Assessing competency to address ethical issues in medicine. Acad Med. 1991;66:14–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Singer PA, Siegler M. Elective use of life-sustaining treatments. In: Stollerman GH (ed). Advances in internal medicine, volume 36. New York: Year Book, 1991;57–79.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Cohen R, Rothman AI, Ross J, et al. A comprehensive assessment of graduates of foreign medical schools. Ann R Coll Physicians Surg Can. 1988;21:505–9.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Streiner DL, Norman GR. Health measurement scales: a practical guide to their development and use. New York: Oxford University Press, 1989;79–96.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Koty S, Johnson NL. Encyclopedia of statistical sciences, volume 4. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1983; 215 (equation 16).Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kramer MS, Feinstein AR. Clinical biostatistics: LIV. The biostatistics of concordance. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1981;29:111–23.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Fleiss JL, Cohen J. The equivalence of weighted kappa and the intraclass correlation coefficient as measure of reliability. Educ Psychol Meas. 1973;33:613–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Becker RA, Chambers JM, Wilks AR. The new S language: a programming environment for data analysis and graphics. Pacific Grove, CA: Wadsworth and Brooks, 1988.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Hanley & Befus, Inc. 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • Peter A. Singer
    • 1
    • 5
  • Robert Cohen
    • 2
    • 4
  • Anja Robb
    • 3
  • Arthur Rothman
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of MedicineUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada
  2. 2.Department of SurgeryUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada
  3. 3.Department of Family and Community MedicineUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada
  4. 4.Department of the Clinical Skills Assessment UnitUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada
  5. 5.Department of the Centre for BioethicsUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations