Journal of General Internal Medicine

, Volume 11, Issue 7, pp 426–430

Brief screens for mental disorders in primary care

  • Andrew C. Leon
  • Mark Olfson
  • Myrna M. Weissman
  • Laura Portera
  • Bruce H. Fireman
  • Robert S. Blacklow
  • Christina Hoven
  • W. Eugene Broadhead
Brief Reports

Abstract

We evaluated a set of diagnostic screens for mental disorders in primary care. A self-administered screening questionnaire containing 26 items testing for multiple mental disorders was completed by 1,001 patients. Brief diagnostic modules, structured for psychiatric diagnoses, were subsequently administered to each patient by a research nurse. Operating characteristics of the screens were as follows: alcohol dependence (sensitivity [SE] 0.75; positive predictive value [PPV] 0.58; [κ] 0.63), drug dependence (SE 0.50; PPV 0.50; κ 0.50), generalized anxiety disorder (SE 0.74; PPV 0.44; κ 0.44), major depressive disorder (SE 0.71; PPV 0.52; κ 0.50), obsessive compulsive disorder (SE 0.71; PPV 0.15; κ 0.21), and panic disorder (SE 0.71; PPV 0.43; κ 0.48). Other chance-corrected measures of agreement are also reported, and criterion validity of the screens is examined. The results provide evidence that the screens discriminate between patients with symptomatology meeting established diagnostic criteria and those without. They detected previously unrecognized cases in this study and may prove to be valuable tools for psychiatric diagnosis in primary care.

Key words

mental disorders diagnostic screens primary care brief screens operating characteristics 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Burnam MA, Wells KB, Leake B, Landsverk J. Development of a brief screening instrument for detecting depressive disorders. Med Care. 1988;26:775–89.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Apfeldorf WA, Shear MK, Leon AC, Portera L. A brief screen for panic disorder. J Anxiety Disorders. 1994;8:71–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Spitzer RL, Williams JBW, Kroenke K, et al. Utility of a new procedure for diagnosing mental disorders in primary care: the PRIME-MD 1000 study. JAMA. 1994;272:1749–56.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Broadhead WE, Leon AC, Weissman MM, et al. Development and validation of the SDDS-PC screen for multiple mental disorders in primary care. Arch Family Med. 1995;4:211–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Roback G, Randolph L, Seidman B, Pasko T. Physician Characteristics and Distribution in the United States. Chicago, Ill: American Medical Association; 1994.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wachter RM. Rationing health care: preparing for a new era. South Med J. 1995;88:25–32.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Weissman MM, Olfson M, Leon AC, et al. Brief diagnostic interviews (SDDS-PC) for multiple mental disorders in primary care: a pilot study. Arch Family Med. 1995;4:220–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    American Psychiatric Association. Committee on Nomenclature and Statistics. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. 4th ed. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 1994.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sheehan DV. The Anxiety Disease. New York, NY: Charles Scribner and Sons; 1983.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Leon AC, Shear MK, Portera L, Klerman GL. Assessing impairment in patients with panic disorder: the Sheehan Disability Scale. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 1992;27:78–82.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kraemer HC. Evaluating Medical Tests: Objective and Quantitative Guidelines. Newbury Park, Calif: Sage Publication; 1992.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cohen J. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ Psychol Measurement. 1960;20:37–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Soost HJ, Lange HJ, Lehmacher W, Ruffing-Kullman B. The validation of cervical cytology: sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values. Acta Cytol. 1991;35:8–14.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Stckles EA, Ominsky SH, Sollitto RA, Gavlin HB, Monticciolo DL. Medical audit of a rapid-throughput mammography screening practice: methodology and results of 27,114 examinations. Radiology. 1990;175:323–7.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Littrup PJ, Lee F, Mettlin C. Prostate cancer screening: current trends and future implications. CA Cancer J Clin. 1992;42:198–211.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of General Internal Medicine 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Andrew C. Leon
    • 6
  • Mark Olfson
    • 1
  • Myrna M. Weissman
    • 1
  • Laura Portera
    • 6
  • Bruce H. Fireman
    • 2
  • Robert S. Blacklow
    • 3
  • Christina Hoven
    • 4
  • W. Eugene Broadhead
    • 5
  1. 1.College of Physicians and Surgeons of Columbia University and New York State Psychiatric InstituteNew York
  2. 2.Kaiser PermanenteOakland
  3. 3.Northeastern Ohio Universities College of MedicineRootstown
  4. 4.Duke University Medical CenterDurham
  5. 5.Danville (VA) Regional HospitalUSA
  6. 6.Department of Psychiatry, Box 147Cornell University Medical CollegeNew York

Personalised recommendations