Brief screens for mental disorders in primary care
We evaluated a set of diagnostic screens for mental disorders in primary care. A self-administered screening questionnaire containing 26 items testing for multiple mental disorders was completed by 1,001 patients. Brief diagnostic modules, structured for psychiatric diagnoses, were subsequently administered to each patient by a research nurse. Operating characteristics of the screens were as follows: alcohol dependence (sensitivity [SE] 0.75; positive predictive value [PPV] 0.58; [κ] 0.63), drug dependence (SE 0.50; PPV 0.50; κ 0.50), generalized anxiety disorder (SE 0.74; PPV 0.44; κ 0.44), major depressive disorder (SE 0.71; PPV 0.52; κ 0.50), obsessive compulsive disorder (SE 0.71; PPV 0.15; κ 0.21), and panic disorder (SE 0.71; PPV 0.43; κ 0.48). Other chance-corrected measures of agreement are also reported, and criterion validity of the screens is examined. The results provide evidence that the screens discriminate between patients with symptomatology meeting established diagnostic criteria and those without. They detected previously unrecognized cases in this study and may prove to be valuable tools for psychiatric diagnosis in primary care.
Key wordsmental disorders diagnostic screens primary care brief screens operating characteristics
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 5.Roback G, Randolph L, Seidman B, Pasko T. Physician Characteristics and Distribution in the United States. Chicago, Ill: American Medical Association; 1994.Google Scholar
- 8.American Psychiatric Association. Committee on Nomenclature and Statistics. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. 4th ed. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 1994.Google Scholar
- 9.Sheehan DV. The Anxiety Disease. New York, NY: Charles Scribner and Sons; 1983.Google Scholar
- 11.Kraemer HC. Evaluating Medical Tests: Objective and Quantitative Guidelines. Newbury Park, Calif: Sage Publication; 1992.Google Scholar
- 14.Stckles EA, Ominsky SH, Sollitto RA, Gavlin HB, Monticciolo DL. Medical audit of a rapid-throughput mammography screening practice: methodology and results of 27,114 examinations. Radiology. 1990;175:323–7.Google Scholar