- 57 Downloads
OBJECTIVES: To describe discharge rates, geographic and patient characteristics, treatment patterns, costs, and outcomes of patients hospitalized with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) in Pennsylvania hospitals and compare these patients from rural and urban counties.
DESIGN: A retrospective database study.
PATIENTS: Adult patients (age ≥18) with an ICD-9-CM diagnosis of pneumonia discharged from 193 Pennsylvania hospitals (n=36,222) in 1991 from the MediQual Systems Pennsylvania database.
MEASUREMENTS: Patient characteristics included a pneumonia-specific severity index, microbiologic etiology, and a number of comorbid conditions. Treatment indicators included the specialty of the admitting physician, length of stay, admittance to an intensive care unit, and mechanical ventilation. Cost indicators included charges and estimated costs. Outcomes measured were inpatient mortality and discharge disposition. Counties in Pennsylvania were classified into seven urban or rural groups, and patients were classified by the county of residence.
RESULTS: The discharge rate for CAP was 4.0 per 1,000 and did not vary systematically across urban or rural counties. Most patients were treated in local hospitals. The average distance between residence and hospital was 5.4 miles and varied with urban or rural classification (range 2.5–9.3 miles). Among CAP patients, 37.8% were at low risk of mortality, with no systematic differences across rural or urban patients with respect to pneumonia severity. Rural patients were more likely to be treated by a family physician and somewhat less likely to be admitted to an intensive care unit or to be mechanically ventilated. Costs of treating rural patients were lower. In-hospital mortality rates, with controls for admission severity, were comparable or better for rural patients than for urban patients.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with CAP are treated in hospitals located in counties similar to ones in which they reside. The cost of treatment was lower for rural patients than for urban patients, but outcomes were not different.
Key wordscommunity-acquired pneumonia rural and urban hospitalized patients cost of treatment outcomes
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Statistical Abstract of the United States: 1994. 114th ed. Washington, DC: US Bureau of the Census; 1994:94.Google Scholar
- 2.Graves EJ. 1993 Summary: National Hospital Discharge Survey. Vital and Health Statistics of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Washington, DC: National Center for Health Statistics, US Department of Health and Human Services; May 24, 1965.Google Scholar
- 3.Health Care Financing Administration. Health Care Financing Review, Statistical Suppl. 1995:211.Google Scholar
- 4.Prospective Payment Assessment Commission. Utilization of Inpatient Hospital Services by Rural Medicare Beneficiaries. Lyme, NH. Prepared by Codman Research Group. Technical Report E91-03.Google Scholar
- 7.US Congress, Office of Technology Assessment. Health Care in Rural America. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office; September 1990. OTA-H-434.Google Scholar
- 9.Ricketts TC. A focus on rural and regional health care delivery. In: Ricketts TC, Savitz LA, Gesler WM, Osborne DN, eds. Geographic Methods for Health Services Research. Lanham, Md: University Press of America; 1994:11–47.Google Scholar
- 12.Fine MJ, Orloff JJ, Arisumi D, et al. Prognosis of patients hospitalized with community acquired pneumonia. Am J Med. 1990;85:5-IN–5-8N.Google Scholar
- 13.Butler MA, Beale CL. Rural-urban codes for metro and non metro counties, 1993. Washington, DC: US Department of Agriculture Economic Research Services; 1994.Google Scholar
- 14.Census of Population: General Population Characteristics. Washington, DC: US Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census; 1990.Google Scholar
- 15.American Hospital Association. AHA Guide to the Health Care Field. Chicago, Ill: American Hospital Association; 1993.Google Scholar
- 16.Lilienfeld AM, Lilienfeld DE. Foundations of Epidemiology. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 1976.Google Scholar
- 17.Federal Register Medical Program. Changes to the Inpatient Hospital Prospective Payment System and Fiscal Year 1993 Rates: Proposed Rule. Washington, DC: US Department of Health and Human Services; 1992.Google Scholar