“My most meaningful patient”
- 89 Downloads
OBJECTIVE: To determine the usefulness of critical-incident reports in facilitating reflective learning and the types of experiences that learners found meaningful on a general medicine service.
DESIGN: Team members wrote about their most meaningful patient of the month and what was learned from the patient. They shared their narratives during teaching rounds at the end of each month. The written reports were collected and subjected to qualitative thematic analysis.
SETTING: General medicine teaching service of an academic medical center.
PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: Medical students, residents, and attending physicians.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Ninety-eight reports were collected over 10 months and subjected to thematic analysis. Reports were coded for six major themes, with a mean of 2.09 themes per narrative. The number of reports containing each theme was 47 for biomedical, 46 for communication with patients and families, 38 for psychosocial, 32 for the physician’s role, 30 for personal feelings, and 14 for ethics. Communication issues constituted the theme most frequently reported by third-year students; biomedical and psychosocial themes by interns; biomedical by supervising residents; and the physician’s role by attending physicians. Reports from men and women contained a similar mean number (men 2.101; women 2.128) and distribution of themes.
CONCLUSIONS: The critical-incident technique promoted reflection on the meaning of clinical experiences. Qualitative thematic analysis revealed the diversity of meaningful experiences on a general medicine service and the high frequency of nonbiomedical themes. This study suggests that reflective exercises can provide a window into the experience of students and residents.
Key wordscritical incidents narrative reports medical education psychosocial medicine general medicine service
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Suchman AL, Branch WT, Matthews DA. The role of the medical interview in the physician’s search for meaning. In: Lipkin M, Putnam SM, Lazare A, eds. The Medical Interview: Clinical Care, Education and Research. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag; 1995.Google Scholar
- 3.Glaser B, Straus AL. The Discovery of Grounded Theory. New York, NY: Basic Books; 1967.Google Scholar
- 4.Straus AL. Qualitative Analysis for Social Scientists. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press; 1987.Google Scholar
- 5.Somer R, Somer B. A Practical Guide to Behavioral Research. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 1986.Google Scholar
- 6.Freire P, Pedagogy of the Oppressed. New York, NY: Continuum; 1986.Google Scholar
- 7.Schön D. The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. New York, NY: Basic Books; 1987.Google Scholar
- 8.Kolb DA. Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development. Engelwood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall; 1984.Google Scholar
- 10.Brookfield S. Using critical incidents to explore learner’s assumptions. In: Mezirow J, ed. Fostering Critical Reflection in Adulthood: A Guide to Transformative and Emancipatory Learning. San Francisco, Calif: Jossey-Bass; 1990:177–93.Google Scholar
- 11.Mezirow J. How critical reflection triggers transformative learning. In: Mezirow J, ed. Fostering Critical Reflection in Adulthood: A Guide to Transformative and Emancipatory Learning. San Francisco, Calif. Jossey-Bass; 1990:1–20.Google Scholar