Journal of General Internal Medicine

, Volume 11, Issue 11, pp 705–706

Physician education, evidence and the coming of age of CME

  • Dave Davis


  1. 1.
    Gifford DR, Mittman BS, Fink A, Lanto AB, Lee ML, Vickrey BG. Can a specialty society educate its member to think differently about clinical decisions? Results of a randomized trial. J Gen Intern Med. 1996;11:664–72.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Rogers EM. Diffusion of Innovations. New York, NY: The Free Press. 1995.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fox RD, Mazmanian PE, Putnam RW. Changing and Learning in the Lives of Physicians. New York, NY: Praeger Publications. 1989.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lau J, Antman EM, Jimenez-Silva J, Kupelnick B, Mosteller F, Chalmers TC. Cumulative meta-analysis of therapeutic trials for myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 1992;327:248–54.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bertram DA, Brooks-Bertram PA. The evaluation of continuing medical education: a literature review. Health Education Monographs. 1977;54:330–62.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Oxman AD, Thomson MA, Davis DA, Haynes RB. No magic bullets: a systematic review of 102 trials of interventions to improve professional practice. Can Med Assoc J. 1995;153:1423–31.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chambers L, Davis DA, Dok C, et al. The impact of CME. Mobius. 1986;6:59–62.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Davis D, Thomson MA, Oxman AD, Haynes RB. Changing physician performance: a systematic review of the effect of continuing medical education strategies. JAMA. 1995;274:9:700–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Taylor-Vaisey AL. Information needs of CME providers: Research and Development Resource Base in Continuing Medical Education. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 1995;15:2:117–21.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of General Internal Medicine 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dave Davis
    • 1
  1. 1.Office of Continuing Education Faculty of MedicineUniversity of TorontoOntarioCanada

Personalised recommendations