Advertisement

Journal of General Internal Medicine

, Volume 11, Issue 6, pp 373–376 | Cite as

Impact of an interactive video on decision making of patients with ischemic heart disease

  • Lawrence Liao
  • James G. Jollis
  • Elizabeth R. DeLong
  • Eric D. Peterson
  • Kenneth G. Morris
  • Daniel B. Mark
Brief Reports

Abstract

An experimental pilot study using repeated measures to examine the impact of an interactive video program on the decision making of patients with ischemic heart disease was carried on at a tertiary care center and a Veterans Affairs hospital. The patients (n=60, mean age 61.1 years, 77% male, 75% white, 26.7% with acute myocardial infarction), who had undergone diagnostic cardiac catheterization and were found to have significant coronary artery disease (≥75% stenosis in at least one vessel), watched the Shared Decision-Making Program (SDP) for Ischemic Heart Disease (IHD), a novel interactive video system designed to provide information necessary for patients to participate actively in decision making. This program compares medical therapy, angioplasty, and bypass surgery through a physician narrator, patient testimonials, and empirically-based, patient-specific outcome estimates of short-time complications and long-term survival. Before and after viewing the SDP, patients completed surveys containing multiple choice questions and Likert scales. They rated the program as more helpful than all other decision aids except the physician, and after viewing the SDP they expressed increased confidence in their treatment choice and decreased confidence in alternative options (p=.0001). The greatest effects appeared to be concentrated in those patients with less education (p=.04), and the program appeared to increase anxiety in nonwhite patients compared with white patients (p=0.07).

Key words

ischemic heart disease decision making patient education interactive video program 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Deber RB. Physicians in health care management, 7: The patient-physician partnership: changing roles and the desire for information. Can Med Assoc J. 1994;151(2):171–6.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Brody DS, Miller SM, Lerman CE. Smith DG, Caputo GC. Patient perception of involvement in medical care: relationship to illness attitudes and outcomes. J Gen Intern Med. 1989;4:506–11.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Greenfield S, Kaplan S, Ware JE. Expanding patient involvement in care. Ann Intern Med. 1985;102:520–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kasper JF, Mulley AG, Wennberg JE. Developing shared decision-making programs to improve the quality of health care. QRB. 1992;18:183–90.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    O’Connor GT, Plume SK, Olmstead EM, et al. A regional prospective study of in-hospital mortality associated with coronary artery bypass grafting. JAMA. 1991;266:803–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    O’Connor GT, Plume SK, Olmstead EM, et al. Multivariate prediction of in-hospital mortality associated with coronary artery bypass grafting. Circulation. 1992;85(6):2110–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hannan EL, Kilburn H, O’Donnell JF, et al. Adult open heart surgery in New York state. JAMA. 1990;264:2768–74.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hannan EL, Arani DT, Johnson LW, et al. Percutaneous tansluminal coronary angioplasty in New York state. JAMA. 1992;268:3092–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Califf RM, Harrell FE Jr, Lee KL, et al. The evolution of medical and surgical therapy for coronary artery disease: a 15-year perspective. JAMA. 1989;261:2077–86.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mark DB, Nelson CL, Califf RM, et al. Continuing evolution of therapy for coronary artery disease. Circulation. 1994;89(5):2015–25.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Muhlbaier LH, Pryor DB, Rankin JS, et al. Observational comparison of event-free survival with medical and surgical therapy in patients with coronary artery disease: 20 years of follow-up. Circulation. 1982;86(5 suppl):II-198–204.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hlatky MA. Califf RM, Harrell FE Jr, et al. Comparison of predictions based on observational data with the results of randomized controlled trials of coronary artery bypass surgery. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1988;11 (2):237–45.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Cummings SR, Strull W, Nevitt MC, Hulley SB. Planning the measurements: questionnaires. In: Hulley SB, Cummings SR, eds. Designing Clinical Research. Baltimore, Md: Williams and Wilkins; 1988.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Rosner B. Fundamentals of Biostatistics. Belmont, Calif: Duxbury Press; 1990.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Christensen-Szalanski JJJ, Boyce WT, Harrell H, Gardner MM. Circumcision and informed consent: is more information always better? Med Care. 1987;25:856–67.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Degner LF, Sloan JA. Decision making during serious illness: what role do patients really want to play. J Clin Epidemiol 1992;45(9):941–50.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ende J. Kazis L, Ash A, Moskowitz MA. Measuring patients’ desire for autonomy: decision making and information-seeking preferences among medical patients. J Gen Intern Med. 1989;4:23–30.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Wenneker MB, Epstein AM. Racial inequalities in the use of procedures for patients with ischemic heart disease in Massachusetts. JAMA. 1989;261:253–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ford E, Cooper R, Castaner A, Simmons B, Mar M. Coronary arteriography and coronary bypass survey among whites and other racial groups relative to hospital-based incidence rates for coronary artery disease: findings from NHDS. Am J Public Health. 1989;79(4):437–40.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Deber RB. Physicians in health care management, 8: The patient-physician partnership: decision making, problem solving and the desire to participate. Can Med Assoc J. 1994;151(4):423–7.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of General Internal Medicine 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lawrence Liao
    • 1
  • James G. Jollis
    • 1
  • Elizabeth R. DeLong
    • 2
  • Eric D. Peterson
    • 1
  • Kenneth G. Morris
    • 3
  • Daniel B. Mark
    • 1
  1. 1.the Department of MedicineDuke University Medical CenterDurham
  2. 2.Division of Biometry, Department of Community and Family MedicineDuke University Medical CenterDurham
  3. 3.Division of Cardiology, Department of MedicineDurham Veterans Affairs Medical CenterDurham

Personalised recommendations