Journal of General Internal Medicine

, Volume 10, Issue 7, pp 406–408 | Cite as

Examining the validity of severity measures in today’s health policy context

  • Lisa I. Iezzoni


  1. 1.
    Epstein AM. Changes in the delivery of care under comprehensive health care reform. N Engl J Med. 1993; 329:1672–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Jost TS. Health system reform. Forward or backward with quality oversight. JAMA. 1994;271:1508–11.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    United States General Accounting Office. Health Care Reform. “Report Cards” Are Useful but Significant Issues Need to Be Addressed. (GAO/HEHS-94- 219). Washington, DC: United States General Accounting Office; Health, Education, and Human Services Division, 1994.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    United States General Accounting Office. Employers Urge Hospitals to Battle Costs Using Performance Data. (GAO/HEHS-95-1). Washington, DC: United States General Accounting Office; Health, Education, and Human Services Division, 1994.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Iezzoni, LI, Shwartz M, Restuccia J. The role of severity information in health policy debates: a survey of state and regional concerns. Inquiry. 1991;28:117–28.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Iezzoni LI, Greenberg LG. Widespread assessment of risk-adjusted outcomes: lessons from local initiatives. Joint Commission J Qual Improv. 1994;20:305–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Selker HP. Systems for comparing actual and predicted morality rates: characteristics to promote cooperation in improving hospital care. Ann Intern Med. 1993;118:820–2.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kassirer JP. The use and abuse of practice profiles. N Engl J Med. 1994;330:634–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Pennsylvania Health Care Cost Containment Council. Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery. Technical Report. Harrisburg, PA: Pennsylvania Health Care Cost Containment Council, 1992.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    The White House Domestic Policy Council. Health Security: The President’s Report to the American People. Washington, DC: The White House Domestic Policy Council, 1993; 100.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Fine MJ, Hanusa BH, Lave JR, et al. Comparison of a disease-specific and a generic severity of illness measure for patients with community- acquired pneumonia. J Gen Intern Med. 1995;10:359–68.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Donabedian A. Explorations in Quality Assessment and Monitoring. Volume I. The Definition of Quality and Approaches to Its Assessment. Ann Arbor, MI: Health Administration Press, 1980;101.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Steen PM, Brewster AC, Bradbury RC, Estabrook E, Young JA. Predicted probabilities of hospital death as a measure of admission severity of illness. Inquiry. 1993; 30:128–41.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Iezzoni LI. Dimensions of risk. In: Iezzoni LI (ed). Risk Adjustment for Measuring Health Care Outcomes. Ann Arbor, MI: Health Administration Press, 1994;112.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Iezzoni LI, Shwartz M, Ash AS, Hughes JS, Daley J, Mackiernan YD. Severity measurement methods and predicting pneumonia deaths. Med Care. In press, 1995.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Harrell FE, Lee KL, Califf RM, Pryor DB, Rosati RA. Regression modelling strategies for improved prognostic prediction. Stat Med. 1984;143–52.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Keeler EB, Rubenstein LV, Kahn KL, et al. Hospital characteristics and quality of care. JAMA. 1992;268:1709–14.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kuhn EM, Hartz AJ, Gottlieb MS, Rimm AA. The relationship of hospital characteristics and the results of peer review in six large states. Med Care. 1991;29:1028- 38.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hartz AJ, Kuhn EM, Green R, Rimm AA. The use of risk-adjusted complication rates to compare hospitals performing coronary artery bypass surgery or angioplasty. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1992;8: 524–38.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Park RE, Brook RH, Kosecoff J, et al. Explaining variation in hospital death rates, randomness, severity of illness, quality of care. JAMA. 1990;264:484–90.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Dubois RW, Rogers WH, Moxley JH, Draper D, Brook RH. Hospital inpatient mortality. Is it a predictor of quality? N Engl J Med. 1987;317:1674–80.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Dubois RW, Brook RH. Preventable deaths: who, how often, and why? Ann Intern Med. 1988; 109:582–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Fink A, Yano EM, Brook RH. The condition of the literature on differences in hospital mortality. Med Care. 1989;27:315- 36.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Thomas JW, Holloway JJ. Guire KE. Validating risk-adjusted mortality as an indicator for quality of care. Inquiry. 1993;30:6–22.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Zimmerman JE, Knaus WA, Sharpe SM, Anderson AM, Draper EA, Wagner DP. The use and implications of do not resuscitate orders in intensive care units. JAMA. 1986;255: 351–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of General Internal Medicine 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lisa I. Iezzoni
    • 1
  1. 1.Division of General Medicine and Primary Care, Department of MedicineHarvard Medical School, Beth Israel Hospital, the Charles A. Dana research Institute, and the Harvard—Thorndike LaboratoryBoston

Personalised recommendations