Journal of General Internal Medicine

, Volume 4, Issue 6, pp 506–511 | Cite as

Patient perception of involvement in medical care

Relationship to illness attitudes and outcomes
  • David S. Brody
  • Suzanne M. Miller
  • Caryn E. Lerman
  • David G. Smith
  • G. Craig Caputo
Original Articles

Abstract

Objective:The purpose of this study was to explore the relationships among patients’ perceptions about the roles they played during medical visits, their subsequent attitudes about their illnesses and treatments, and their self-rated improvement.

Design:Questionnaires were completed by patients before, one day after, and one week after their medical visits, and by their physicians following the visits.

Setting:The study was conducted in a general internal medicine faculty practice that provided adult primary care to a largely HMO population.

Participants:Adult patients with new or increased symptoms who were capable of reading and understanding the study questionnaire.

Main results:Fifty-five patients (47%) reported playing an active role; 62 patients (53%) reported playing a passive role. After adjusting for age, sex, baseline illness ratings, and physician-rated prognosis, “active” patients reported less discomfort (p=0.04), greater alleviation of symptoms (p=0.008), and more improvement in their general medical condition (p=0.04) one week after the visits than did “passive” patients. These differences were not influenced by the roles patients desired to play. Active patients also reported less concern with their illnesses (p=0.04), a greater sense of control of their illnesses (p=0.04), and more satisfaction with their physicians (p=0.02) one day after the visit. Post-visit dysfunction ratings were not related to patients’ role perceptions.

Conclusions:Patients’ perceptions about their involvement in care appeared to be related to their attitudes about their illnesses as well as to recovery. Further research is needed, however, to determine the factors that influence these role perceptions and to define the types of patients, illnesses, and settings in which the benefits of active-role perceptions are most likely to be realized.

Key words

patient role clinical decision making doctor-patient communication doctor-patient relationship patient satisfaction 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Lazare A, Eisenthal S, Wasserman L. The customer approach to patienthood. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1975;32:553–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Brody D. The patient’s role in clinical decision-making. Ann Intern Med. 1980;93:718–22.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lidz C, Meisel A. Informed consent and the structure of medical care. U.S. Government Printing Office. 1982;2:317–410.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Strull WM, Lo B, Charles G. Do patients want to participate in medical decision making? JAMA. 1984;252:2990–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ende J, Kazis L, Ash A, Moskowitz MA. Measuring patients’ desire for autonomy: decision making and information-seeking preferences among medical patients. J Gen Intern Med. 1989;4:23–30.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cassileth B, Zupkis RV, Sutton-Smith K, March V. Information and participation preferences among cancer patients. Ann Intern Med. 1980;92:832–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Greenfield S, Kaplan S, Ware J. Expanding patient involvement in care. Ann Intern Med. 1985;102:520–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Greenfield S, Kaplan S, Ware J, Yano E, Frank H. Patients’ participation in medical care: effects on blood sugar control and quality of life in diabetes. J Gen Intern Med. 1988;3:448–57.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Roter DL. Patient participation in the patient provider interaction: the effects of patient question asking on the quality of interaction, satisfaction and compliance. Health Education Monograph. 1977;5:281–315.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ware JE, Snyder MK, Wright WR. Development and validation of scales to measure patient satisfaction with health care services. Springfield, VA: National Technical Information Service, 1976. NTIS publication no. (PB) 288-330.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Schulman B. Active patient orientation and outcomes in hypertensive treatment. Med Care. 1979;17:267–80.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Brody D, Miller S. Illness concerns and recovery from a URI. Med Care. 1986;24:742–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Miller SM, Combs C, Stoddard E. Information, coping and control in patients undergoing surgery and stressful medical procedures. In: Steptoe A, Appels GA, eds. Stress, personal control and health. Chichester, England: Wiley; in press.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bowers KS. Pain, anxiety, and perceived control. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1968;32:596–602.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Pennebaker JW, Burnam A, Schaeffer MA, Harper DC. Lack of control as a determinant of perceived physical symptoms. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1977;35:167–74.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Imboden JB. Psychosocial determinants of recovery. Adv Psychosom Med. 1972;8:142–55.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bandura A. Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychol Rev. 1977;84:191–215.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bandura A. The assessment and predictive generality of self-percepts of efficacy. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 1982;13:195–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Szasz TS, Hollender MFH. A contribution to the philosophy of medicine: the basic models of the doctor-patient relationship. Arch Intern Med. 1956;97:585–92.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of General Internal Medicine 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • David S. Brody
    • 1
  • Suzanne M. Miller
    • 2
  • Caryn E. Lerman
    • 3
  • David G. Smith
    • 1
  • G. Craig Caputo
    • 1
  1. 1.the Section of General Internal MedicineTemple University School of MedicinePhiladelphia
  2. 2.the Department of PsychologyTemple UniversityPhiladelphia
  3. 3.the Division of Cancer ControlFox Chase Cancer CenterPhiladelphia

Personalised recommendations