Journal of General Internal Medicine

, Volume 9, Issue 10, pp 550–553 | Cite as

Screening with the alcohol use disorders identification test (AUDIT) in an inner-city population

  • J. Harry Isaacson
  • Richard Butler
  • Mark Zacharke
  • Angela Tzelepis
Original Articles


Objectives: 1) To determine the operating characteristics of the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) in an inner-city population and 2) to compare AUDIT performance with physician recognition of alcohol-related problems.

Design: New patients were administered a health habits questionnaire, which included the AUDIT and the alcohol portion of the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R (used as the “gold standard” for alcohol abuse or dependence). The findings were compared with physician recognition based on chart review.

Setting: Inner-city general medicine clinic staffed by resident physicians with faculty supervision.

Patients/participants: Consecutive new patients over a ten-week period. Of 166 consecutive new patients, 23 were not contacted, 17 refused to participate, two were excluded for gross cognitive deficits, and 124 completed the study.

Results: Of the 124 patients, 41 (33%) met criteria for past or present alcohol abuse or dependence. The AUDIT correctly identified 26/27 (sensitivity of 96%) of patients with current problems and 0/14 of patients with past problems only. Physician rates of recognition of current and past alcohol-related problems based on chart review were 12/27 (sensitivity of 44%) and 1/14 (7%), respectively. The specificities of both the AUDIT and physician recognition were high, 96% and 99%, respectively.

Conclusions: 1) Alcohol-related problems were common in this setting. 2) The AUDIT had a high sensitivity and a high specificity for detection of current alcohol problems in this setting, but it failed to detect patients with only past histories of alcohol problems. 3) The AUDIT performed significantly better than did the physicians in detecting alcohol problems. 4) The addition of an assessment of past alcohol use to supplement information from the AUDIT would appear to represent a promising screening strategy worthy of further investigation.

Key words

alcoholism alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test screening ambulatory care 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Simon DG, Eley JW, Greenberg RS, Newman N, Gillespie T, Moore M. A survey of alcohol use in an inner-city ambulatory care setting. J Gen Intern Med. 1991;6:295–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Buchsbaum DG, Buchanan RG, Centor RM, Schnoll SH, Lawton MJ. Screening for alcohol abuse using CAGE scores and likelihood ratios. Ann Intern Med. 1991;115:774–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Coulehan JL, Zettler-Segal M, Block M, McClelland MD, Schulberg HC. Recognition of alcoholism and substance abuse in primary care patients. Arch Intern Med. 1987;147:349–52.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cleary PD, Miller M, Bush BT, Warburg MM, Delbanco TL, Aronson MD. Prevalence and recognition of alcohol abuse in a primary care population. 1988;85:466–71.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cyr MG, Wartman SA. The effectiveness of routine screening questions in the detection of alcoholism. JAMA. 1988;259:51–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Buchsbaum DG, Buchanan RG, Poses RM, Schnoll SH, Lawton MJ. Physician detection of drinking problems in patients attending a general medicine practice. J Gen Intern Med. 1992;7:517–21.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Guide to Clinical Preventive Services: An Assessment of the Effectiveness of 169 Interventions. Williams and Wilkins, 1989;277–82.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Babor T. F., Grant M. From clinical research to secondary prevention: international collaboration in the development of the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT). Alcohol Health Res World. 1989;13:371–4.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ewing JA. Detecting alcoholism: the CAGE questionnaire. JAMA. 1984;252:1905–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Selzer ML. The Michigan Alcoholism Screening Test: the quest for a new diagnostic instrument. Am J Psychiatry. 1971;127:1653–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Spitzer RL, Williams JB, Gibbon M, First MB. Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press, 1990.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gardner MJ. BMJ. ISBN 0-7279-0281-4.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Claussen B, Aashland OG. The Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) in a routine health examination of long-term unemployed. Addiction. 1993;88:363–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Barry KL, Fleming MF. The Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) and the SMAST-13: predictive validity in a rural primary care sample. Alcohol and Alcoholism. 1993;28:33–42.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of General Internal Medicine 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. Harry Isaacson
    • 3
  • Richard Butler
    • 1
  • Mark Zacharke
    • 2
  • Angela Tzelepis
    • 2
  1. 1.Mt. Clemens General HospitalMt. Clemens
  2. 2.Wayne State UniversityDetroit
  3. 3.Cleveland Clinic FoundationOne Clinic CenterCleveland

Personalised recommendations