Journal of General Internal Medicine

, Volume 9, Issue 9, pp 517–521

The use of videotape in internal medicine training

  • Howard B. Beckman
  • Richard M. Frankel
Perspectives

Summary

By paying attention to the power of the medium and the method of feedback, videotaping programs can be a remarkably successful teaching and research tool. Learners can view their performance, review feedback on their own behavior, knowledge, and displayed attitudes, and develop plans to change behavior that can be followed up on subsequent tapings. In addition, trainees can share important experiences with each other and valued teachers.

Interviewing skills can be documented and preserved, creating a video library that allows trainees to actually visualize improvements in their own performances over time. An archive of many such performances allows trainees, faculty, and researchers alike comparative access to the complex challenges of the medical interview.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Stoeckle JD, Billings JA. A history of history-taking: the medical interview. J Gen Intern Med. 1987;2:119–27.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Inui TS, Carter WB. Problems and prospects for health services research on provider-patient communication. Med Care. 1985;23:521–38.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Beckman HB, Frankel RM. The effect of physician behavior on the collection of data. Ann Intern Med. 1984;101:692–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Beckman HB, Markakis KM, Suchman AL, Frankel RM. The doctor-patient relationship and malpractice: lessons from patient depositions. Arch Intern Med. 1994;154:1365–70.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kaplan SH, Greenfield S, Ware JE Jr. Assessing the effects of physician-patient interactions on the outcomes of chronic disease. Med Care. 1989;27(suppl 3):S110-S127.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Beckman HB, Frankel R, Kihm J, Kulesza G, Geheb M. Measurement and improvement of humanistic skills in first-year trainees. J Gen Intern Med. 1990;5:42–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Novack DH, Volk G, Drossman DA, Lipkin M Jr. Medical interviewing and interpersonal skills teaching in US medical schools. JAMA. 1993;269:2101–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Maguire GP, Rutter DR. HIstory-taking for medical students. I—difficiencies in performance. Lancet. 1976;ii:556–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Scheidt PC, Lazoritz S, Ebbeling WL, Figelman AR, Moessner HF, Singer JE. Evaluation of a system providing feedback to students on videotaped patient encounters. J Med Educ. 1986;61:585–90.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Maguire GP, Fairbair S, Fletcher C. I. Benefits of feedback training in interviewing as students persist. Br Med J. 1986;292:1573–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Schoonover SC, Basuk EL, Smith R, Gaskill D. The use of videotape programs to teach interpersonal skills. J Med Educ. 1983;58:804–10.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Stoeckle JD, Lazare A, Weingarten C, McGuire MT. Learning medicine by videotape recordings. J Med Educ. 1971;46:518–24.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Simek-Downing L, Guirk M. Videotape analysis of medical students’ interviewing skills. Fam Med. 1985;17:57–60.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Branch WT. Teaching models in an ambulatory training program. J Gen Intern Med. 1990;5:515–26.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Premi J. An assessment of 15 years’ experience in using videotape review in a family practice residency. Acad Med. 1991;66:56–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Frankel RM, Beckman HB. Impact: an interaction-based method for preserving and analyzing clinical transactions. In: Pettingrew I. (ed). Straight Talk. Louisville, KY: Humana Inc., 1982.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    DiMatteo MR, Taranta A, Friedman HS, Prince IM. Predicting patient satisfaction from physicians nonverbal communication skills. Med Care. 1980;20:376–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Carter WB, Inui TS, Kukull WA, Haigh VH. Outcome-based doctor-patient interaction analysis: II. Identifying effective provider and patient behavior. Med Care. 1982;20:550–66.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lipkin M, Quill TE, Napodano RJ. The medical interview: a core curriculum for residencies in internal medicine. Ann Intern Med. 1984;100:277–84.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Frankel RM, Beckman HB. The accuracy of the medical history. In: Lipkin M, Putnam S, Lazare A (eds). The Medical Encounter. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1994.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Frankel RM. Unpublished work, 1986.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Skeff KM, Campbell M, Statos G, Jones HW, Cooke M. Assessment by attending physicians of a seminar method to improve clinical teaching. J Med Educ. 1984;59:944–50.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Cassie JM, Collines GF, Daggett CJ. The use of videotapes to improve clinical teaching. J Med Educ. 1977;52:353–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kalet A, Earp JA, Kowlawitz V. How well do faculty evaluate the interviewing skills of medical students. J Gen Intern Med. 1992;7:449–505.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Maguire GP, Clarke D, Jolley B. An experimental comparison of three courses in history-taking skills for medical students. Med Educ. 1977;11:175–82.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Wasserman RC, Inui TS. Systematic analysis of clinician-patient interactions: a critique of recent approaches with suggestions for future research. Med Care. 1983;21:279–93.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Noel GL, Herbers JE Jr, Caplan MP, Cooper GS, Pangaro LN, Harvey J. How well do internal medicine faculty members evaluate the clinical skills of residents? Ann Intern Med. 1992;117:757–65.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Nathan RG, Hohmann LK, Nusbaum HJ. Initial evaluation of a hidden agenda method of teaching the intern. Fam Med. 1991;23:285–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of General Internal Medicine 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Howard B. Beckman
    • 1
    • 2
  • Richard M. Frankel
    • 3
    • 4
  1. 1.Primary Care Internal MedicineHighland HospitalUSA
  2. 2.University of Rochester School of Medicine and DentistryRochester
  3. 3.Center for Human InteractionHighland HospitalUSA
  4. 4.University of Rochester School of Medicine and DentistryRochester

Personalised recommendations