Journal of General Internal Medicine

, Volume 11, Issue 10, pp 597–607 | Cite as

Classifying general medicine readmissions

Are they preventable?
  • E. Z. Oddone
  • M. Weinberger
  • M. Horner
  • C. Mengel
  • F. Goldstein
  • P. Ginier
  • D. Smith
  • J. Huey
  • N. J. Farber
  • D. A. Asch
  • L. Loo
  • E. Mack
  • A. Giobbie Hurder
  • W. Henderson
  • J. R. Feussner
  • the Veterans Affairs Cooperative Studies in Health Services Group on Primary Care and Hospital Readmissions
Original Articles


OBJECTIVES: To describe a new quality assessment method used to classify the preventability of hospitalization in terms of patient, clinician, or system factors.

DESIGN: The instrument was developed in two phases. Phase 1 was a prospective comparison of admitting residents’ and their attending physicians’ classifications of the perceived preventability of consecutive admissions to one Veterans Affairs Medical Center (VAMC) excluding admissions to the intensive care unit (ICU). In phase 2, a panel of 10 physicians rated 811 abstracted records of readmissions from nine VAMCs.

SETTING: Nine VAMCs across the United States with varying degrees of university hospital affiliation.

PATIENTS: Phase 1, 156 patients admitted to the general medicine service at the Durham VAMC. Phase 2, 514 patients accounting for 811 readmissions within 6 months of a general medicine service discharge at nine VAMCs.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Physicians used a checklist to record the reason for hospitalization, the preventability of the hospitalization, and, if preventable, a reason defining preventability, which was classified in terms of system, clinician, and patient factors. In phase 2, two physician panelists assessed preventability for each chart. When two panelists disagreed on the preventability of hospitalization, a third panelist, blind to the original assessments, rated the chart. In phase 1, residents and attending physicians rated 33% and 34% of admissions as preventable (κ=0.41), respectively. In phase 2, 277 (34%) of 811 readmissions were deemed preventable. Intraobserver accuracy for the assessment of preventability was 96% (κ=0.89). Interobserver accuracy was 73% (κ=0.43). Hospital system factors accounted for 37% of preventable readmissions, clinician factors for 38%, and patient factors for 21%. The nine hospitals differed markedly in their profile of reasons for preventable readmissions (p=.005).

CONCLUSIONS: Using a new method of determining the preventability of hospitalizations, we identified several factors that might avert hospitalizations. Focusing efforts to identify preventable hospitalizations may yield better methods for managing patients’ total health care needs; however, the content of those efforts will vary by institution.

Key words

hospital readmissions quality of care preventability of hospitalization 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Iglehart JK. The American health care system managed care. N Engl J Med. 1992;327:742–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Relman AS. Controlling costs by “managed competition”—would it work? N Engl J Med. 1993;328:133–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fisher ES, Wennberg JE, Stukel TA, Sharp SM. Hospital readmission rates for cohorts of Medicare beneficiaries in Boston and New Haven. N Engl J Med. 1994;331:989–95.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Roos NP, Flowerdew G, Wajda A, Tate RB. Variations in physician’s hospitalization practices: a population-based study in Manitoba, Canada. Am J Public Health. 1986;76:45–51.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Roos NP. Hospitalization style of physicians in Manitoba: the disturbing lack of logic in medical practice. Health Serv Res. 1992;27:361–84.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Payne SMC. Identifying and managing inappropriate hospital utilization: a policy synthesis. Health Serv Res. 1987;22:712–69.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Berwick DM. Eleven worthy aims for clinical leadership of health system reform. JAMA. 1994;272:797–802.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Panzer RJ. Hospital readmissions and quality of care. Am J Med. 1991;90:665–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gertman PM, Restuccia JD. The appropriateness evaluation protocol: a technique for assessing unnecessary days of hospital care. Med Care. 1981;19:855–70.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    InterQual, Inc. The ISD—A Review System with Adult Criteria. Chicago, Ill: InterQual, Inc.; 1987.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Siu AL, Sonnenberg FA, Manning WG, et al. Inappropriate use of hospitals in a randomized trial of health insurance plans. N Engl J Med. 1986;315:1259–66.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ludke RL, MacDowell NM, Booth BM, Hunter SA. Appropriateness of admissions and discharges among readmitted patients. Health Serv Res. 1990;25:501–25.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Winickoff RN, Restuccia JD, Fincke BG. Concurrent application of the appropriateness evaluation protocol to acute admissions in Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Centers. Med Care. 1991;29:AS64–76.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Weinberger M, Oddone EZ, Hendersen W, et al. Can increased access to primary care prevent hospital readmissions? N Engl J Med. 1996;334:1441–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Siegel S. Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 1956:196.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Fleiss JL. Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions. 2nd ed. New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons; 1981:212.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Cochran WG. Sampling Techniques. 3rd ed. New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons; 1977:64–6.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Oddone E, Weinberger M, Hurder A, Henderson W, Simel D. Measuring activities in clinical trials using random work sampling: implications for cost-effectiveness analysis and measurement of the intervention. J Clin Epidemiol. 1995;48:1011–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Koran LM. The reliability of clinical methods, data and judgements. N Engl J Med. 1975;293:695–701.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ludke RL, Wakefield DS, Booth BM, Kern DC, Burmeister LF. Nonacute utilization of Department of Veteran Affairs inpatient services. Med Care. 1991;29:AS29–39.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Bigby J, Dunn J, Goldman L, et al. Assessing the preventability of emergency hospital admissions. Am J Med. 1987;83:1031–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Frankl SE, Breeling JL, Goldman L. Preventability of emergent hospital readmission. Am J Med. 1991;90:667–74.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Weissman JS, Gatsonis C, Epstein AM. Rates of avoidable hospitalization by insurance status in Massachusetts and Maryland. JAMA. 1992;268:2388–94.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Bindman AB, Grumbach K, Osmond D, et al. Preventable hospitalizations and access to care. JAMA. 1995;274:305–11.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Hayward RA, McMahon LF Jr, Bernard AM. Evaluating the care of general medicine inpatients: how good is implicit review? Ann Intern Med. 1993;118:550–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    MacKenzie EJ, Steinwachs DM, Bone LR, Floccare DJ, Ramzy AI. Inter-rater reliability of preventable death judgements. J Trauma. 1992;33:292–302.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Goldman RL. The reliability of peer assessments of quality of care. JAMA. 1992;267:958–60.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Dubois RW, Brook RH. Preventable deaths: who, how often, and why? Ann Intern Med. 1988;109:582–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Blackwell Science, Inc. 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • E. Z. Oddone
    • 1
  • M. Weinberger
    • 2
  • M. Horner
    • 1
  • C. Mengel
    • 3
  • F. Goldstein
    • 4
  • P. Ginier
    • 5
  • D. Smith
  • J. Huey
    • 6
  • N. J. Farber
    • 7
  • D. A. Asch
    • 7
  • L. Loo
    • 8
  • E. Mack
    • 9
  • A. Giobbie Hurder
    • 10
  • W. Henderson
    • 10
  • J. R. Feussner
  • the Veterans Affairs Cooperative Studies in Health Services Group on Primary Care and Hospital Readmissions
  1. 1.the Center for Health Services Research in Primary CareVeterans Affairs Medical CenterDurham
  2. 2.Richard L. Roudebush VAMCIndianapolis
  3. 3.Dwight D. Eisenhower VAMCLeavenworth
  4. 4.William Jennings Bryan Dorn VAMCColumbia
  5. 5.VAMCFresno
  6. 6.VAMCCincinnati
  7. 7.VAMCPhiladelphia
  8. 8.Jerry Pettis Memorial VAMCLoma Linda
  9. 9.VAMCBrooklyn
  10. 10.Center for Cooperative Studies in Health ServicesVAMCHines

Personalised recommendations