- 195 Downloads
Objective:To identify differences between patients viewed as frustrating by their physicians and those considered typical and satisfying.
Design:This cross-sectional observational study focused on psychologically distressed high users of medical services. Frustrating patients were compared with typical and satisfying patients, using data from patient questionnaires, physician assessments, structured psychiatric interviews, and computerized utilization records.
Setting:Group Health Cooperative of Puget Sound, a large health maintenance organization.
Patients/participants:Study patients were in the top decile for ambulatory visits, and had elevated scores for anxiety, depression, and somatization. Among the 339 patients invited to participate in the study, 251 agreed, and 228 were rated by their physicians.
Main results:A substantial proportion (37%) of the high users were viewed as frustrating by their physicians. Physicians’ ratings of physical disease severity did not differ among the groups, but frustrating patients rated their own health status less favorably and reported more somatic symptoms and disabilities. The frustrating group utilized more medical services than did other distressed high utilizers. All three groups had a high prevalence of mental disorders. However, frustrating patients had higher rates of somatization and generalized anxiety disorder.
Conclusions:Physicians and their frustrating patients had contrasting views of the patients’ illnesses. The best predictors of physician frustration were somatization and increased medical service utilization. There is need for further research and clinical attention concerning optimal clinical management for patients with somatization.
Key wordsfrustrating patients somatization medical services utilization
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 3.Von Mering O, Earley LW. The ambulatory problem patient: a unique teaching resource. Am J Psychiatry. 1969;126:108–12.Google Scholar
- 7.Gerrard TJ, Riddell JD. Difficult patients; black holes and secrets. Br Med J. 1988;297;530–2.Google Scholar
- 13.American Psychiatric Association. Diagnosic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. (3rd ed revised) DSM-III-R. Washington, DC: APA, 1987.Google Scholar
- 14.Derogatis LR, Rickels K, Ulenhuth EH, Covi L. The Hopkins Symptom Checklist: a measure of primary symptom dimensions. In: Pichot P, ed. Psychological measurements in psychopharmacology: problems in pharmacopsychiatry. Basel: S. Karger, Switzerland 1974;7:79–110.Google Scholar
- 15.Belloc NB, Breslow L. Hochstim DJ. Measurement of physical health in a general population survey. Am J Epidemiology. 1971;193:328–36.Google Scholar
- 19.Kleinman AM, Kleinman J. Somatization. In: Kleinman A, Good B, eds. Culture and depression. Berkeley, California: University of California, 1985;429–90.Google Scholar
- 20.Katon W, Lin EHB, Von Korff M, et al. Somatization: a spectrum of severity. Am J Psychiatry. 1991 (in press).Google Scholar
- 22.Barsky AJ, Wyshak G, Klerman GL. Hypochondriacs, doctors, and medical care. 1991 (in press).Google Scholar
- 26.Katon W, Roy-Byrne PP. Antidepressants in the medically ill: diagnosis and treatment in primary care. Clin Chemistry. 1988;34:829–36.Google Scholar