Primary care and receipt of preventive services
OBJECTIVE: To examine whether health insurance, a regular place of care, and optimal primary care are independently associated with receiving preventive care services.
DESIGN: A cross-sectional telephone survey.
SETTING: Population based.
PARTICIPANTS: Probability sample of 3,846 English-speaking and Spanish-speaking women between the ages of 18 and 64 in urban California.
INTERVENTIONS: Women were asked about their demographic characteristics, financial status, health insurance status, need for ongoing care, regular place of care, and receipt of blood pressure screening, clinical breast examinations, mammograms, and Pap smears. Women who reported a regular place of care were asked about four components of primary care: availability, continuity, comprehensiveness, and communication.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: In multivariate analyses that controlled for differences in demographics, financial status, and need for ongoing care, having a regular place of care was the most important factor associated with receiving preventive care services (p<.0001). Having health insurance (p<.001) and receiving optimal primary care from the regular place of care (p<.01) further significantly increased the likelihood of receiving preventive care services.
CONCLUSION: A regular source of care is the single most important factor associated with the receipt of preventive services, but optimal primary care from a regular place increases the likelihood that women will receive preventive care.
Key wordsprimary care preventive care
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 8.Cornelius L, Beauregard K, Cohen J. Usual Sources of Medical Care and Their Characteristics. Rockville, Md: Public Health Service. National Medical Expenditure Survey Research Findings 11, Agency for Health Care Policy and Research publication 91-0042.Google Scholar
- 9.Starfield B. Primary Care. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
- 10.Institute of Medicine. A Manpower Policy for Primary Health Care. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences; 1978;78–102.Google Scholar
- 13.Grumbach K, Seifer S, Vranizan K, Keane D, Huang K, Bindman AB. Physician and clinic supply: impact on preventable hospitalization rates in California. Presented at the California Policy Seminar. 1995: Berkeley.Google Scholar
- 14.United States Census. Current Population Survey, 1994.Google Scholar
- 15.National Center for Health Statistics. The national health interview survey. 1991.Google Scholar
- 16.Guide to Clinical Preventive Services. Report of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Baltimore, Md: Williams and Wilkins; 1989.Google Scholar
- 18.Thornberry OT, Massey JT. Trends in United States telephone coverage across time and subgroups. In: Groves RM, Biemer PP, Lyberg LE, Massey JT, Nicholls WL, Waksberg J, eds. Telephone Survey Methodology. New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons; 1988.Google Scholar
- 22.Hiatt RA, Perez-Stable EJ, Quesenbery C, Sabogal F, Otero-Sabogal R, McPhee SJ. Agreement between self-reported early cancer detection practices and medical audits in Hispanic compared with non-Hispanic white health plan members in Northern California. Prev Med. 1995;24:278–85.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar